Q Anon: 07/14/18 "Trust The Plan"

qanon.pub ^ | 7/14/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube	Thoughts Not Bots	Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader	ImperatorRex	A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming : major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article	Sundance	Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
PDF	Anonymous	The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qanon.pub	Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles	Bagster	Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
	“Power to the People”
YouTube	Praying Medic	Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Twitter	Praying Medic	Immediate reactions to Q-drops
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links
Twitter	ImperatorRex	Includes Q-drop reactions
Thread	SkyPilot	Story of Q - collection of Q information
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website	roserambles.org	Q Cards
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
	“Fight, Fight, Fight!”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube	President Kennedy	The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for your visit, LS, as well as your insight.

You are doing yeoman’s work whatever threads and researches you do! Please continue with that!.... and do please visit whenever it is appropriate for you!

[blu]

Don’t forget how steadfastly uncooperative the members of the House have been in the investigation. They’re all like “Oh, he diddin do nuffin!”

There is not a broom big enough...yet!

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>I don’t want to put the time or effort into trying to interpret “Q” so I just don’t follow.<<

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That’s a paradox, isn’t it? Too much information? Hundreds of millions of people all over the world taking it in with some level of belief? Q has become its own branch of the alt-Trump-media, and a very important one.

I cannot follow it blow-by-blow either; and definitely have no time for the chans. But a number of extremely capable Freepers do all this for us. A most serviceable and amusing summary is Bagster’s “Oracle”, published in the Q thread daily (when he can keep out of mod-jail).

You make a great point about the CRs. Congress has Zero power to compel these days in their investigations, because they cannot de-fund FBI, DOJ or anything else for that matter. They’ve really gotten their tit in the wringer with these CRs, and can’t get it out.

[grey_whiskers]

I’m sticking around.....have been here a long time.

If you'd just been having a typical catfight with No_Doll_i, I'd just have watched with bemusement.

But to call her a troll, then to imply Q threads (and Q afficianados in general), are engaging in "groupthink," but that you are above such, smells of superciliousness, of a type very characteristic of midwit leftists.

As opposed to that, some of your comments re: Page and Stzrok imply someone of good faith who is tired of the GOP-e not following GEOTUS's lead.

Laser indicator placed, just in case. Carry on.

[Yulee]

the time will come when it will not be safe fore [Deep State] members to walk the streets.
***************
Maxine Waters and other Deep State actors may have found this on Qanon, and as a result, know their time is short, and are yelling attack.

[Revel]

Click on Bagster’s name. Click “In forum” at the top of page. You get posts back to July 3rd. go to the bottom of the page and click “Next”.
Then you get this:

“Your query returned no results.”

Now do the same for anyone else. See the difference?

[Revel]

See my last post. (#366)

[TruthWillWin]

Click on Bagster’s name. Click “In forum” at the top of page. You get posts back to July 3rd. go to the bottom of the page and click “Next”.

Then you get this:

“Your query returned no results.”

1. You said July 13 on your original post?

2. I can go back past July 3 on his posts. Went back over 10 pages, back to 6/27 then stopped, could have gone back more?

[Mears]

““Your query returned no results.”

—
I have seen that for many people-—it seems to be erratic.

.

[Revel]

Yes sorry. What I said originally was correct. Here is the last post I can see in the history:

Q Anon: 07/11/18 “Trust The Plan”
07/13/2018 5:44:30 PM PDT · 988 of 1,149
bagster to Jet Jaguar
:)

Bagster

[Revel]

It sounds like it is not happening for everyone. But it happens consistently for me.

[LouisianaJoanof Arc]

Laser indicator placed?

Geez. You might lighten up a tad.

LOL

[BlessedBeGod]

“Your query returned no results.”

That happens to me sometimes. Make sure you're on the "Comments" tab each time you click "Next Page."

[StormFlag]

Manchin Tells Schumer to ‘Kiss My You-Know-What’

Manchin told Politico on Friday that Schumer has no power over support for Kavanaugh’s nomination.

“I’ll be 71-years-old in August; you’re going to whip me? Kiss my you know what,” Manchin, referring to Schumer’s efforts to whip up the votes against Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, told Politico in an interview.

~Awesome...

[MNDude]

Check this out, this is an excellent thread about the Royals, Trump, Elton John, and the Deep state.

https://mobile.twitter.com/verykate17/status/1017683404299653120?s=21

[Mears]

I just tried it with your username——went back to June 30,4 pages,-—and probably could have gone more-——some people it’s one page and that’s it.

.

[mac_truck]

This of course is a direct result of Congress rolling over for Zero for eight years.

Actually, its a direct result of Clinton IT aide Bryan Pagliano ignoring two Congressional subpoenas and AG Sessions doing absolutely nothing about it.

Obama era AGs always claimed executive privilege, but here its Trump's own AG doing the blocking.

Check out this piece written by Jason Chaffetz for more info.

Strzok testifies, but ex-lover Lisa Page snubs Hill subpoena thanks to a bad call by Sessions

[Disestablishmentarian]

The new Russian indictment is yet another oddity which I find difficult to interpret, because on the surface it is a pathetically weak move by all concerned.

You have shown in another post that the so-called evidence on the DNC server was probably planted, and clumsily so, by Crowdstrike.

This is no surprise. We knew about the data transfer rate, Seth Rich, and other circumstances casting grave doubts on the Russian hacking story.

We know from Wikileaks exactly that a STUPID phishing expedition succeeded in getting John Podesta to reveal his password, hence all the Hillary/Pizzagate emails. This did not require 13 Russian intelligence officers.

So what could possibly be accomplished in this indictment?

What if POTUS suggests to Putin that he needs to get his attorneys to demand the evidence against them—THE DNC SERVER?

If that is the plan ... then can RR be a white hat again?

[heavy12773]

Dead balls accurate.

[defconw]

Thanks for your take. Good to think about.