A phony is either wrong about everything, or has stolen what he is right about. Neither of these conditions apply to Einstein.
Oh.....wait a minute. I think you've just funnin' with us (again).
Posted on 07/05/2018 6:54:21 PM PDT by Simon Green
Einstein's theory of general relativity has passed its toughest-ever test with flying colors, a new study reports.
General relativity, which the great physicist proposed in 1916, holds that gravity is a consequence of space-time's inherent flexibility: Massive objects distort the cosmic fabric, creating a sort of well around which other bodies orbit.
Like all scientific theories, general relativity makes testable predictions. One of the most important is the "equivalence principle" — the notion that all objects fall in the same way, no matter how big they are or what they're made of.=
Researchers have confirmed the equivalence principle many times on Earth — and, famously, on the moon. In 1971, Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott dropped a feather and a hammer simultaneously; the two hit the gray lunar dirt at the same time. (On Earth, of course, the feather would flutter to the ground much later than the hammer, having been held up by our atmosphere.)
But it's tough to know if the equivalence principle applies in all situations — when the objects involved are incredibly dense or massive, for example. This wiggle room has given hope to adherents of alternative gravity theories, though such folks remain in the minority.
The new study could take some of the air out of their optimism. An international team of astronomers tested the equivalence principle under extreme conditions: a system composed of two superdense stellar corpses known as white dwarfs and an even denser neutron star.
The neutron star is a fast-spinning type known as a pulsar. These exotic objects are so named because they seem to emit radiation in regular pulses. This is just an observer effect, however; pulsars blast out radiation continuously, from their poles, but astronomers' instruments pick these beams up only when they're directed at Earth. And because pulsars spin, they can direct their poles toward Earth at regular intervals.
The system in question, known as PSR J0337+1715, is located 4,200 light-years from Earth, in the direction of the constellation Taurus. The pulsar, which rotates 366 times per second, co-orbits on the interior with one of the white dwarfs; the pair circles a common center of mass every 1.6 Earth days. This duo is in a 327-day orbit with the other white dwarf, which lies much farther away.
The pulsar packs 1.4 times the sun's mass into a sphere the size of Amsterdam, whereas the interior white dwarf harbors just 0.2 solar masses and is about the size of Earth. So, they're very different objects — but they should be pulled by the outer white dwarf in the same way if the equivalence principle is on the money.
The researchers tracked the pulsar's movements by monitoring its radio-wave emissions. They did this for six years, using the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope in the Netherlands, the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia and the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.
"We can account for every single pulse of the neutron star since we began our observations," study leader Anne Archibald, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Amsterdam and the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, said in a statement. "And we can tell its location to within a few hundred meters. That is a really precise track of where the neutron star has been and where it is going."
A violation of the equivalence principle would manifest as a distortion in the pulsar's orbit — a difference between the neutron star's path and that of its interior white-dwarf companion. This distortion would cause the pulsar radiation to arrive at a slightly different time than expected.
But the researchers didn't detect any such distortion.
"If there is a difference, it is no more than 3 parts in a million," co-author Nina Gusinskaia, a doctoral student at the University of Amsterdam, said in the same statement.
"Now, anyone with an alternative theory of gravity has an even narrower range of possibilities that their theory has to fit into in order to match what we have seen," Gusinskaia added. "Also, we have improved on the accuracy of the best previous test of gravity, both within the solar system and with other pulsars, by a factor of about 10."
The new study was published online today (July 4) in the journal Nature.
I disagree. I view him as a total phony.
I often can’t locate my keys with that precision!
A phony is either wrong about everything, or has stolen what he is right about. Neither of these conditions apply to Einstein.
Oh.....wait a minute. I think you've just funnin' with us (again).
“And we can tell its location to within a few hundred meters.”
Well it’s only 4200 light years away. Piece of cake.
I jest of course. This is, to me, a mind boggling accomplishment. Kudos to these guys and gals.
Dang...They beat me to it...Since obunghole left office, I have been going to propose them dropping obunghole (a feather with ears), moochie (an enormously dense coal-based object), and hitlary (a very dense gelatinous object) off one of those middle east skyscrapers to demonstrate the same thing...
Dang...They beat me to it...Since obunghole left office, I have been going to propose them dropping obunghole (a feather with ears), moochie (an enormously dense coal-based object), and hitlary (a very dense gelatinous object) off one of those middle east skyscrapers to demonstrate the same thing...
Gravity is no friend of 70/80/90 year old Seniors.
You wrote: I think they’re speaking of its position relative to the other stellar remnants in the system.
You are correct of course. The accuracy that was quoted must be simply the total error in the full system measurement.
But, IMHO, still an amazing accomplishment.
It still sounds impossible. If they can really do it, more power to them.
I’ve not known you to be speechless before!
(No, I do not have those implants. I’d fall over. I’d need a walker.)
It would be much more impressive and practical if they could use this knowledge to really help people on earth. A few examples: stop tornadoes from forming, or accurately predict the exact path a hurricane will take (far enough in advance to be helpful), or cease all media coverage of Hillary Clinton and Maxine Waters.
BUMP!
keep it away from your wallet/credit cards, phones, and computers....
When I worked MRI manufacturing my manager walked into a bay and forgot he had his wallet and phone....wiped em all....hehehe...
Ha. You’re just trying to fool me, as you head off to your, ahem, dancing job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.