Posted on 05/24/2018 11:38:33 AM PDT by ransomnote
Please take some time to go through the LexiQon and the Aggregator Website, https://qanon.pub to which I have standardized it.
I need to check the drop numbers against the numbers in the LexiQon with the now somewhat changed numbers in the Aggregator site. As nearly as I can tell, everything is correct Above about Drop #600 or so, but the listed numbers have changed below there.
Some are just two or three numbers off, but some are now as many as 10 to 20 drops off from what they should be as Q has modified the list, deleted some drops, and apparently ADDED some. WHEE!
I've noticed added graphics as well. FreeQs have commented on the drop numbers not quite agreeing between the aggregator sites. This one seemed to have maintained the most consistent number at the high end. . . but something seems to have changed at the low end. There have apparently been major modifications to the LOWER single and double digit drops. . . and might be worth re-reading.
I also need to have you look for anything NEW that's been added to the Drops since they were first posted. I've caught a few things already. . . for example the addition of a numeric "6" in front of the pluses designating the three elite families at the top of the cabal. Those were not there when that drop was first published. I don't know when it was changed. but now they are "(6+), (6++), and (6+++)", resulting in "666" with the plusses. . . something certainly with meaning. In addition, Q has arranged these Drops so that Drop #666 is the one that has [666] in reference to the stock market decline at close is in that DROP! Another topic for discussion?
What other Easter eggs are in the additions and deletions?
Oh, incidentally, the LexiQon is now up to 26,346 words same page count.
Because they're traitorous whackjobs?
That weird light green leaf like thing sticking out doesnt belong on a magnolia, or if it does I cant tell what its supposed to be.
There are many different types of poppy leaves. One could possibly argue if taken alone that it is supposed to be a very primitive representation of a poppy leaf of some some generic nonspecific strain of poppy I suppose but then when added back to the rest of the flower it makes no sense because the one kind of leaf that doesnt show up on poppies is the dark round non-toothed leaves that surround the flower. Those appear on magnolias.
"Because they're traitorous whackjobs? "
~~~~~~~~~~~
Because, when they were "in the closet", they were easily blackmailed.
Now that they flaunt doing the nastiest things right out in public -- no problemo...
~~~~~~~~~~~
Go figure...
TXnMA
I wasn’t throwing stones!
Thanks for all you do. Even a 3 X 5 card with your link on it can be a powerful red-pilling aid.
Yes, I knew that. Just expressing my lingering embarrassment to All the thread. My boo boo messed with our much improved record of peace and comraderie. Thank you.
Am I wrong in assuming that Page was inserted into the organization specifically to develop the pretense that Trump should be surveilled?
You’re too hard on yourself was my point.
We’re also going thru Q withdrawal which I take as an encouraging sign. We all want the big boom, but the little things that have been accumulating are amazing.
Great re-read!
Swordy, Q so often injects a Christian reference or call to prayer, or a scripture recently. This 666 is sacred scripture as all Christians know, and is to represent the Mark of the Beast on our forehead and in our hand in order to buy and sell.
Now, we think in terms of technology reading our thoughts in our forehead and our eyes in our identity, computer watches for example.
So Q is speaking to that Christian understanding, or is he simply pointing to the discomforting stock exchange drop to 666 on that day, or, could the number 666 have been manipulated at the stock exchange, as a signal to someone for messaging? White Hats or the Black Hats messaging?
Q pointed out the exchange was manipulated to achieve that result as a message to Trump. It was the cabal saying "we can strike at the economy. And this is our level of control!"
I think Q wants us to really pay attention to that fact by making it obvious and underling it. Hes tied a big ribbon around it.
This seems flexible, since they see Trump improving the economy, possibly holding the x-xx-xxx slush money, the trade deal with China, returning mnfg back to USA, etc. Why would they tolerate his successes, and more on the way, if they can break the economy at will, do you think?
- - Q wants us to really pay attention to that fact by making it obvious - -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Isnt that more of what Q has been doing ie expose the really bad criminal things that the baddies have been doing, and making sure everyone knows just why they are being carted off to Gitmo and hung.
True. We are more than ready for frog marching and I dont mean just Weinstein. Will the authorities plan with media for best camera angles and action and even rehearse the perp walk prior to it, so handcuffs can clearly be seen, when they get ahold of say, Hillary? That is what an on scene reporter was describing at the courthouse/jail walk, for Weinstein.
It was pulled off perfectly for the camera. If not Hotel Guantanamo I hope HRC gets the same camera treatment.
True. We are more than ready for frog marching and I dont mean just Weinstein. Will the authorities plan with media for best camera angles and action and even rehearse the perp walk prior to it, so handcuffs can clearly be seen, when they get ahold of say, Hillary? That is what an on scene reporter was describing at the courthouse/jail walk, for Weinstein.
It was pulled off perfectly for the camera. If not Hotel Guantanamo I hope HRC gets the same camera treatment.
I suspect it will be citizen camerapeople.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.