Posted on 03/20/2018 9:27:44 PM PDT by ransomnote
It goes down and I agree Q will be studied.
I took it to mean MZ + RT + 8 = 10
Are there others switching?
_____________________________________________________________________
Oh, I will keep a skeptics eye on anyone who leaves the ‘inner sanctum’ of the Trump administration. However, it might be a stretch to think he or any of the others are or will fully “switch sides.” One would think this administration had been fully prepared for what is currently happening. In my opinion, some undoubtedly knew from before day one.
I’m not sure about Columbine or Pulse shooter. Those seemed more legit.
JUST mho...
I don’t think Tillerson switched or is a black hat. From my understanding, he has serious disagreements with Trump, and finally there were too many, and he was axed. Like the Iran deal; and I remember a couple of other issues. He also did a speech or statement on Fag Day or is it Fag Month, praising pervs. I do not think Trump has ever said anything like that.
Plus, again imho, Tillerson is used to be the Big Dog. He can’t be BD under POTUS DJT.
Iow, I think Tillerson is a mixed bag. (Apologies to Bagster for using his name in vain...)
“With Snodgres, OKC was bombed to destroy the medical records of over 400k soldiers who had various types of Gulf War Syndrome medical issues, so that the government did not have to acknowledge & pay for treatment.
With Davis, it was a plot by Iraqic soldiers (who came to the US as a refugees after the war), with help from Al-Qaeda.”
Thanks Bitt.
I read one comment but I can’t remember if it was this thread or the Bomber Is Dead thread, about a man surnamed Conditt was was in prison for child molestation.
Anyone remember if it was on this thread?
It’s the Conditt thread titled ‘Breaking’.
Yup.
Thank you, someone alerted me there.
Probably no connection, definitely not the father according to names I’ve read.
Yep, but didn’t figure I needed one on this thread.
I'll pass.
The Blueprint: How the Democrats Won Colorado (and Why Republicans Everywhere Should Care)
DIARY / Ned Ryun //
Posted at 9:46 am on April 14, 2010 by Ned Ryun
SPREAD THE WORD AND BE PREPARED
I listened to the Snodgres interview. Then I listened to a second one with John B. Wells on CTM.
In the second interview, Snodgres says that it is standard practice to have 2 different operations which don’t know about each other. IIRC, the Iraqis were at OKC and placed explosive charges inside the building (because a truck bomb could not take down the whole thing).
McVeigh was there for the truck bomb and was going to be the patsy who either got arrested or blown up by the truck bomb. Snodgres also says that there were 3 separate bombs placed inside the Murrah building but only one of them went off.
He said the FBI was there within minutes - before most of the local cops got there - and that one of the FBI missions was to retrieve the 2 bombs that didn’t go off so that investigators would not find them. He also says that a local cop who was first on the scene saw things and was later Arkancided for it along with a few other people who had copies of the records he kept.
Thanks.
Guess I need to go back & listen closer. I reckon because he didn’t directly say Iraqi soldiers, & she never mentions Gulf War Syndrome, I didn’t make the connection.
Still learning some fascinating information though.
Quite possibly. But at this point, I suspect everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.