To: MtnClimber
Evidently the dog's owner stuffed the dog into a sealed carry on bag, and not into a proper travel crate. What was she thinking?
To: Governor Dinwiddie
Other news reports say it was a TSA approved pet carrier.
9 posted on
03/14/2018 7:17:13 PM PDT by
SargeK
To: Governor Dinwiddie
Really? That changes the narrative a bit.
17 posted on
03/14/2018 7:29:51 PM PDT by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
As I understand it, that is not true. Instead, the dog was in the sort of soft-sided pet carrier that is commonly used on planes. Sure, Mom should have put up more of a stink. As should the other passengers.
To: Governor Dinwiddie
Evidently the dog's owner stuffed the dog into a sealed carry on bag, and not into a proper travel crate. What was she thinking? Bingo. and it only took 5 posts before a thinking person asked the appropriate question. What about this bag the family put their dog into as they boarded an airplane. How was the dog supposed to breathe in a sealed carry on bag and why did they even bring a dog on an airplane?
I am not excusing the airline. If they knowingly stuffed a sealed bag carrying a dog they should be held responsible.
One doesn't have to take sides in a stupid case like this. BOTH sides were at fault.
Was THIS the bag the family placed a dog into to board an airplane?
To: Governor Dinwiddie
What was she thinking?
That she was heading for the gym?
71 posted on
03/15/2018 3:25:32 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(My cat is not fat, she is just big boned........)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson