So again, I suggest accepting the null hypothesis and working from there.
The null hypothesis would be that Q is fake.
Continue to analyze Q with the null hypothesis as your founding premise. Very often this method will reveal aspects previously overlooked.
If you understand what’s going on here, you’ll see that truth overrides everything else, including Q.
If Q happens to be true, then Q is valid. But if we assume Q is fake and continue to analyze it from that perspective, we will surely find things we wouldn’t otherwise have found.
Everybody knows founding premises are out of style and debunked.
Thing is, we all started with (or at least I did) that premise that Q was probably not legit... after following along, trying to figure it out for myself, with a little research and the realization that he was not telling us anything like normal leakers have done and simply asking questions, wanting us to look into it for ourselves.
Well now many of us have realized he is the real deal and no further proof is needed. We are not trying to convert or convince people, we are simply trying to have a discussion that is continually trolled by doubters like you begging us to convert them or prove something to them. Google is pretty simple to use, are you simply too lazy to do the research yourself or you just strive to be a disruptive trolls?? You have many like minded people burying their heads in the sand over at the DUmp, where no amount of proof will ever change their minds, if your looking for people who agree with you.