Posted on 02/14/2018 3:24:25 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3631368/posts?q=1&;page=1
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate Q Anon threads on Free Republic by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many Q Anon posts posts in my profile page located here: Library of prior Q Anon threads
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. JFK Secret Societies Speech (full version)
I really didn’t mean to shut the whole thread down.
Maybe we should accept the null hypothesis and work from there.
Everybody knows the debate is never over.
Everybody knows you didn't shut the whole thread down.
Nobody knows what the null hypothesis is.
AMEN! AMEN!
There’s having a point ... and then there’s merely being relentlessly, virulently obnoxious out of horrendous RAD dynamics. Time will tell.
AMEN!
Tunnel vision as wide as a drinking straw tends to result in that level blindness ... as does ego problems bigger than one’s stunted understanding.
Where’s my amen, sister friend?
I don’t know who you are or what your agenda is. Maybe you’re just a regular person like me trying to find out what’s true.
But I can tell you, when a sincere person’s belief is questioned, they tend to become more serious and focus on the content.
And when a non sincere person is questioned, very often they will resort to sarcasm or ridicule.
Others affix themselves compulsively to groups they aren't welcome in to prove to themselves and the world that they matter--by the level of annoyance and hostility they can generate.
So again, I suggest accepting the null hypothesis and working from there.
The null hypothesis would be that Q is fake.
Continue to analyze Q with the null hypothesis as your founding premise. Very often this method will reveal aspects previously overlooked.
Hmmmm. I wonder if the NSA has extra guards currently.
If you understand what’s going on here, you’ll see that truth overrides everything else, including Q.
If Q happens to be true, then Q is valid. But if we assume Q is fake and continue to analyze it from that perspective, we will surely find things we wouldn’t otherwise have found.
Thanks for the reminder. My fingers.... uhhhh .... slipped. Yeah, that’s it. They slipped. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it—for this post.
Everybody knows.....
I'm Batman.
I don’t think they are capable of that kind of mature action. They are like moths to a flame out of their horrific degree of RAD (Reactive Attachment Disorder).
So you’re telling me it’s true that you’re not sincere.
It’s poor reality testing to expect anything else from such folks. They almost literally ‘can’t help it.’ It’s their ‘One Trick Pony’ route to feeling worthwhile and significant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.