Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radioactive Fallout: "Radiological Defense" 1961 US Department of Defense, Civil Defense
Government Civil Defense Project ^ | 1961 | US Defense Department

Posted on 12/14/2017 1:05:46 PM PST by Sawdring

Radioactive Fallout: "Radiological Defense" 1961 US Department of Defense, Civil Defense

Old Time Civil Defense movie for explanation of the effects of nuclear weaponry and radiation. Enjoy!


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: civildefense; fema

1 posted on 12/14/2017 1:05:46 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Every once in a while you see somebody referring to a “Nuclear Bomb Shelter”.

Nope. Well, maybe Cheyenne Mountain.

There are only *Fallout* shelters


2 posted on 12/14/2017 1:14:18 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Bkmk


3 posted on 12/14/2017 1:24:22 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker
Yeah, no sense in building anything that needs to withstand 43KT of tnt. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory just uploaded a 43KT shot today. It was beautiful and terrible all in the same frame. Turk
4 posted on 12/14/2017 1:28:47 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Bkmrk.


5 posted on 12/14/2017 1:35:59 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

We done got bomb shelters built here dug into in the mountains in the 1950`s during civil defense exercises against Russian nuclear attack, still in use today.
What you talkin` about?

Evidently it would appear that somebody won`t find it on the internet coz there was no internet then and those people that built them kept it a secret and they is dead and gone by now exceptin` some of us stll got the bomb shelters intact and ready. Um I was there when they built`em. We wuz trained during the GOC ground Observer Corps to spot bears Bombers USSR comin` over and we wuz required to build and stock these bomb shelters, NOT “fallout shelters.” They was designed to withstand an atomic burst close by coz they is solid concrete into the mountain and it`s only 200 yards from my house. You ain`t gonna find`em on the internet nor nowhere coz it was during the Cold war and nobody told nobody where they was.

There is one in California I know of also was still there in the 1980`s in a suburb of SF, built underground to withstand a nuclear burst close by. I saw it up close. YUPYUP YUP you won`t find that one on the net neither...
We also got us a nuclear sub pen here built into the side of the mountain 3 miles deep against a nuclear blast. Been there don that too.


6 posted on 12/14/2017 1:38:56 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ((((("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Well, I stand corrected; however I think Robert Heinlein said it best “The only effective defense against a nuclear weapon is to not be there when it goes off.” *I* wouldn’t trust ‘em, not that it really matters :-)


7 posted on 12/14/2017 2:25:31 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

“In case of nuclear blast, squat down, bend your head between your knees as far as possible and kiss your sweet a** goodbye!”


8 posted on 12/14/2017 4:03:44 PM PST by Nuocmam (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
Funny you should say that. After WWII the government surveyed damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And issued a report in 1950 “The Effects of Atomic Weapons.” They cite protective shelters dug into the side of hills near Nagasaki, which survived the initial blast and thermal effects of the blast. They were described as “very near ground zero.” They also studied survivors and found that a good layer of clothing protected against thermal effects from the blast. They issued recommendations for Americans in case of nuclear attack.

From the overall study, and given a certain minimum distance of course, it is clear that there are ways to respond that maximize survival, even in the face of the nuclear blast. “Duck and cover” was not a joke, and it was not a pointless exercise.

9 posted on 12/14/2017 4:46:34 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Good video.
10 posted on 12/14/2017 6:13:21 PM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

I have a shelter under my back yard. It is entirely steel plate. It is both welded and in some places riveted.

Riveted. Like the Titanic!

Some folks scoff and say it is a tornado shelter. It is not.

My shelter, built in the mid 1960s, has a full 3 feet of earth between the surface and the ceiling.

Also, it has a foyer at the bottom of the stairwell with a 90 degree turn into the main room, because radiation does not go around corners, it was believed at the time.

Pretty sure that is still the case.


11 posted on 12/15/2017 11:28:29 AM PST by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Unless you have a black hole down there.


12 posted on 12/15/2017 11:35:45 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

For later.

L


13 posted on 12/15/2017 11:37:57 AM PST by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Nice!

I think having a fallout shelter would be a good idea, no argument. Groundwater is way too high here, at least to go underground.


14 posted on 12/15/2017 11:42:26 AM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Oh, the bottom half of the shelter is definitely below the water table here in Houston.

The whole room is intact and maintains its integrity, and thus floats a little. There is a rectangular outline in my lawn indicating that the entire structure has raised a few inches over time.

I was advised to keep it full of water to prevent that.

It was wired for electricity, and one of the ways I dated the structure was by dating the incandescent light bulb that was still in its fixture. In the old days, round incandescent bulbs had a small bump at the very top. It was not completely spherical.

Thus, my guess is that it was installed during or shortly after the Cuban Missile Crisis.


15 posted on 12/15/2017 12:22:35 PM PST by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Sweet.

I want one that doubles as a rehearsal studio, I knew of one of those in San Francisco.


16 posted on 12/15/2017 12:29:46 PM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Not counting the stairwell or foyer, the room itself is about 10’ by 13’ and 7 feet high.

It’s not for the claustrophobic.

It has 2 poles in the center for support, and a few triangular gussets emanating from the walls to strengthen the ceiling.

By today’s standards the poles and gussets are very, very anemic.

Judging by the hammock hooks welded into the walls, it looks like it was meant for a family of 3.


17 posted on 12/15/2017 1:06:34 PM PST by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson