Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Argentinian navy detects noises that could be from missing sub
cnn ^ | 11/20/2017

Posted on 11/20/2017 9:11:04 AM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: BenLurkin

“The submarine, with 44 crew on board, disappeared 430km (270 miles) off the Argentine coast and no trace of it has been found.”

Spectre.


41 posted on 11/20/2017 10:27:41 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (“The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive.” - DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It is a sad ongoing story. I’ve been watching the news from our Navy and the US Southern Command on Twitter. Our Navy and Airforce are performing air searches, we have a mini sub and a deep sea rescue vehicle their already, one can rescue to 850 ft. And one to 2000ft..

@USNavy #BREAKING: #USNavy deploys unmanned submersibles in Argentine submarine search - navy.mil/submit/display…

@USNavy #BREAKING: Submarine rescue chamber and other assets being mobilized at @MCASMiramarCA to support search for Argentinean Navy submarine A.R.A. San Juan -

@southcomwatch BREAKING: @USNavy deploys unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV) to Argentina to join in the search for the Argentine navy submarine A.R.A. San Juan. Deployment includes one Bluefin 12D (Deep) UUV and three Iver 580 UUVs. southcom.mil/News/PressRele…

@EmbajadaEEUUarg Un C-17 de @usairforce llegó esta mañana a Comodoro Rivadavia con equipos para la operación de búsqueda y rescate del #submarino #ARASanJuan


42 posted on 11/20/2017 10:32:27 AM PST by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Yeah, I was just reading that area averages 3700 ft.. yikes.


43 posted on 11/20/2017 10:34:59 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Riley

Thanks again! And it’s a good quality upload.


44 posted on 11/20/2017 10:48:15 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Nukes. See my FR page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

have never been on a sub - if a normal diesel-electric sub ran into a hurricane, wouldn’t they simply submerge a few hundred feet and travel underwater to ride it out?


45 posted on 11/20/2017 10:58:42 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
have never been on a sub - if a normal diesel-electric sub ran into a hurricane, wouldn’t they simply submerge a few hundred feet and travel underwater to ride it out?

I keep hearing that their last communication indicated that they'd had some kind of major electrical issue, so submerged operation would likely be a problem.

46 posted on 11/20/2017 11:15:45 AM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

You sound like someone who can answer a couple of questions. The sub surfaced, so why didn’t they send out their coordinates while communications were still up and remain at that location until rescued? Don’t subs naturally float but have to be forced to go underwater?


47 posted on 11/20/2017 11:17:15 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

They spend most of their time at sea at snorkel depth. Sub suck on the surface as they wallow like a cow just before giving birth to twins.

snorkel depth allows them to operate submerged and still get the air they need for the diesels.

If as noted in the article they had battery issues then this could be catastrophic - as battery failures can lead to toxic fume release.

IF they had 20 ft seas at the time and the snorkel couldn’t get enough uncontaminated air, I could very easily see them foundering while attempting to address the battery casualty.


48 posted on 11/20/2017 11:38:30 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

Diesel boats switch between battery and diesel power. They have to run a minimum of snorkel depth in order to charge the batteries with the diesels as they have to need air to cycle to prevent CO buildup.

If the seas were 20ft they would have been tossed around like a bingo ball if they completely surfaced, and the snorkel may have been taking on water. Either scenario could very well have ended up with her unable to power forward in rough seas and foundering. I think this is the most likely scenario - the loss of communications ties with that weather scenario as well.


49 posted on 11/20/2017 11:45:47 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Soitainly!


50 posted on 11/20/2017 11:59:11 AM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: reed13k
My point was that whether diesels are running or not, the motor that actually turns the propellers is electric. Therefore an electrical failure (a dead short) could disable propulsion completely.
51 posted on 11/20/2017 12:10:18 PM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

sorry I completely missed that


52 posted on 11/20/2017 12:13:36 PM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Yes.


53 posted on 11/20/2017 2:10:55 PM PST by Buffalo Head (Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

“Their batteries can only be charged when they are on the surface running on diesel power.”

Well, they can snorkel, but they’re only a few feet down and still subject to surface action.


54 posted on 11/20/2017 2:31:56 PM PST by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Not correct. Diesel subs cannot run all of their engines while snorkeling. They do not have enough battery power to stay transit submerged for long distances and make long transits on the surface.


55 posted on 11/20/2017 4:18:52 PM PST by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Now it’s looking like the noises didn’t come from the submarine.

Mystery sound ‘did not come from missing sub’
https://news.sky.com/story/mystery-noise-could-be-missing-submarine-11136421


56 posted on 11/20/2017 4:19:32 PM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

IDK. The only reason they wouldn’t have been able to stay on the surface would be flooding. Maybe they lost all electrical but they would have some kind of emergency battery and communications off of that. I think they sank. I hope not.

Rode subs for three years.


57 posted on 11/20/2017 4:21:34 PM PST by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson