Posted on 02/20/2017 5:57:38 PM PST by tbw2
I have seen articles that he supported pedophilia and arguments the tape is edited. Where is a non-biased analysis or the actual video of what he said?
I am sick of seeing conservatives falling for whatever trick the left comes up with to discredit effective conservatives. You will see I’m sure a few instances of what Trump has possibly said stuff about other races in footage that Tom Arnold has or from files of Apprentice or whatever — expect it to come in the future. The left is trying to discredit Netanyahu for taking some cigars and wine also currently. None of this will affect my high opinion of Netanyahu, and my VERY HIGH opinion of Trump one iota, whatever he grabs.
I’m sick of the ACU and the supposed conservatives attacking Milo. I suspect he is ahead in line with God than the many supposed “Christians” that populate these parts and the ACU. I want to tell fellow Freepers who don’t support Milo at this time: Make like a leaf and get the __ out of here.
It should be OBVIOUS what is going on, here:
PizzaGate has had The Left terrified and doing somethin unfamiliar for the past 3 months:
PLAYING DEFENSE.
WHERE does the energy come from for this vigorous assault on Milo...?
From the relieved ZEAL from getting off of the ropes and onto a battle plan they know well:
OFFENSE.
It wouldn’t matter HOW thin their case, they’d have sprung for the TINIEST opening on the pedophile front.
They only needed an OPENING, and they got it.
And you IDIOTS are re-supplying them, you idiotic, polite, Country Club, blue-haired, checked golf pants types.
James Alefantis Instagram
What I see in videos and blogs that claim to have captured these images is a mix of pics of children, weird stuff like some would call “art”, and porn images that anyone can download. If you’re convinced, that’s OK, I’m not able to say you are wrong. Some say that beauty contests sexualize children, yet they are legal and happen all the time around the country. The strength of these theories rests on one’s individual interpretation and interpretation.
That’s not proof in my book, it’s a theory. What Milo said does not rise to the level of promoting or even accepting pedophilia, but there is a legal definition that may be different from what you or he or I might claim that it is. In the eyes of the law it IS the same thing.
I didn't know that. Seems like a quite common pairing.
Milo isn't nearly done with his "journey" yet. I am willing to bet in 10 years he will again be a very different person.
The ‘what’ has been explained pretty well in other comments, the strange thing is that Milo didn’t immediately go on offense in response.
For all the normalizing of homosexuality that has occurred over the past two decades in popular culture, the concept of gay teenaged boys interacting romantically witj older guy men is stubbornly resistant to the culture wars.
Young straight guy with older female? Hot for Teacher or Mrs. Robinson. Boy is given free rein to fantasize, older woman is expected by society not to act because younger male has nothing to offer her, but if the younger male is in the age of majority, the older woman is a ‘cougar’.
Young straight girl with older male? If the girl has a crush, at worst she is considered confused. Older male is at least expected to understand by society not to reciprocate or pursue until a certain age, but men are generally given free rein to fantasize so long as she hits the age of majority first. Successful men are almost expected to have a youthful ‘trophy wife’.
Younger gay male with older gay male? Totally verboten. not even in popular culture is it seen as acceptable to portray older gay men with drastically younger partners. Strangely, this was more accepted in years prior, but the concept of the ‘old queen’ is apparently antiquated and unacceptable.
Remember, It doesn’t matter what is actually right or wrong with the Milo haters, it only matters to them that he is destroyed. If some of their hypocrisy is a casualty of these skirmishes, all the better.
“gay man, and a child abuse victim.”
It seems that many homosexuals started out that way.
Read the Bible Moron.
Who of us are not flawed individuals? I detest the activist homosexual agenda way more than anyone here, including you. I can prove it with more than four figures donated to Stephen Bennett ministries (you don’t even know about him probably).
So I repeat, specifically for you only this time. Make like a leaf and go __ yourself.
I have made this observation,myself, right here some years ago during the hooha over the
“paedophile” priests. Most of them went after post pubescent males who were legally still “boys” because they were not yet 18. Of course, in the Left media, it was all PEDOPHILIA! because that makes better propaganda. Homosexuals go after this class of boys because only the true paedophiles among them are attracted to the pre-pubes and the just post pubes are easier to seduce/abuse discretely, at least for a while. Propositioning adult parishioners or trying to work a trick in the confessional would much more likely get instant attention.
When Tucker Carlson asked a “Gay” anti Trump guest what Trump would do to hurt gays or what he has done, the gay boy replied after much deflection, “Trump hasn’t rekeased his taxes yet.”
Liberal insanity.
LOL....I just downloaded a few skits from Firesign Theater just the other day. I do not see them referenced around here much at all. I have liked them since high school.
I believe in UK it's about 16.
America is 18, if I'm not mistaken. Is there any variance by state?
Of course, growing up, (and even looking back through historical American census records) you hear tales about Rolling Stones band members wanting to marry young women, etc.
It's a fact that in the "old days" it wasn't totally cast in stone what the "age of consent" meant, and, for instance, it's not totally out of the realm to see 18th and 19th century (even 20th) US Census records which list 26-30 year old husbands with 16 year old wives, even 15 year old wives.
Of course, in these modern times, such considerations and sensibilities obviously apply in the gay realm.
Milo says some outrageous and "edgy" things sometimes. It's certain that he's "on the record" regarding his overall opposition to the exploitation of children.
If he stepped over the line too many times with something he said, he's got some 'splainin' to do.
If Milo's really having a press conference tomorrow, I'll be interested to hear what he has to say...
I like Milo but I dont want to hear anyone talking about sexuality. Be it gay or straight. Looks like hes in some trouble here and that’s too bad. However there is a price to pay for indiscretion and if he has to pay it’s his own fault.
Have you seen much other material from Milo? Half the time he’s just joking, partly his British humor - sometimes hard to know. Having grown up in the UK I can tell you, I saw girls at 13/14 that could convince ANYONE they were 18/19. They dated 18yo’s. It wasn’t considered as extreme as it is here. That said, Milo has often discussed that we don’t really understand sexuality and that he feels the current “age of consent” is about right. When he talks about being a mature 14yo, I do agree there’s wild fluctuations in maturity at that age - I also have an issue with a 17yo being labeled a sexual predator because he had sex with a 16yo, which happens.
SO I’ll state it again; he’s DONE nothing and has clarified that the age of consent is about right.
I eont know the details of the latest story but Milo was 100% correct about Islam. I stand with him against the expansion of Islam.
There’s also a nevertrump circular firing squad. unfortunately the boss didn’t permanently ban them after the election.
I agree with him that that pedophilia is sex with a child that has not gone through puberty.
However, sex with a teenager that is not an adult is statutory rape, and that is also highly illegal, but I would not say that it’s pedophilia.
Pedophilia is a distinctly heinous crime.
If an adult endeavored to have sex with my 13-17 year old male or female child, I would very likely shoot that person.
However, if an 18 year old boy was trying to date my 17 year old daughter, for instance, and possibly even my 16 year old daughter, and things happened as thing do, I would have to look at that situation on an individual basis and determine if something bad happened or not, because that is a bit of a gray area to me.
If a 27 year old was trying to date my 16 or 17 year old daughter, I’m loading the 12 gauge.
But I’m also not willing to destroy Milo for what he said here, and I do not want to see him fired and whatever else.
I agree with you.
This is an attempt to destroy an effective voice on the right.
No more.
No less.
Milo will survive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.