Posted on 11/27/2016 5:46:51 AM PST by learner
Jill does not want a recount, she wants to nullify the votes. She can do this with a slow recount that goes beyond the certification date 12/13. If a state does not certify to Congress by that date the votes do not count and Hillary wins. She can slow the count by challenges which will get them beyond the certify date. Remember Michigan just reported their final vote a week ago, almost three weeks after the election.
If Trump is not the president this coming January expect insurrection and sessions of various states.
” ... but for the Clintons it’s about delegitimizing Trump’s victory. “
I don’t see it that way. I believe Trump will be able to say he WON TWICE regardless of how much they tried to rig the system.
You should do the math.
No, money laundering is only half of the game. The other half is an effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory and start the long process of ending the electoral college. This is a multi-level game that could be a win-win for both Stein and Clinton.
Nevada should be recounted, per W.A.R. hundreds of busses loaded with CA. Dems traveled to Vegas and voted more than once in several locations and stayed at the Stratisphere hotel. Other polling places stayed open after official closing time when poll watchers hat left.
Also, NH has a very small margin 5,000 voteds should be recounted.
then there are places where the dems bragged at ballot stuffing, in Broward, Philly, lets looks at those absentee ballots.
And was the Military vote heavily for Trump counted?
We live in a Banana Republic until we have voter picture id or Biometrics, voting machines not made by a Soros company.
Gosh. Coulda fooled me. It sounds more like concern trolling.
Do you trust Roberts in the USSC?
“allowing a candidate who only received 30,130 votes to negate the votes of trump/clinton combined 2,700,822 isn’t very democratic, is it?”
The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.
Even though Bush clearly beat Gore, the Democrats used the recount to bash Bush and question his legitimacy for his entire presidency. They claimed over and over again that “Bush stole the election.” In spite of no evidence indicating that Gore ever won anything, I once had a liberal PhD tell me just that — with a straight face. She was serious. That is how demented and easily manipulated these people are.
Provided for in the Constitution, in the early years of the Republic, legislative appointment was the most common way that electors were chosen. Governors do not get a veto.
The issue is never the issue. The issue is the Revolution.
************
To liberals, the ends justifies the means. They will stop at nothing to get what they want.
Not just the media.... Soros and the DNC will orchestrate huge protests in WI, PA and MI during the recounts.. especially Madison..to vilify President -Elect Trump and the EC. The Democrat media will cover it 24-7
Even the possibility that Hillary might still scheme her way to the Presidency would have politically explosive consequences.
https://youtu.be/S_lPuyxG2-Y?t=12m07s
Published on Nov 15, 2016
This video is from Dr. Stein’s Facebook page.
“...if you plug those numbers in to any state that you like...not in any of those states would the numbers have changed or would the outcome have changed...”
Concern trollery should result in the zot. Reddit the donald does it and it works. They have a whole bunch of other problems right now, but that’s one thing they got right.
Methinks you are right. I’m sure Soro’s people have been hard at work planning how to exploit and drag out the recount drama in every way possible. Saturation coverage by the media, street protests, and campaigns to end the electoral college. All part of their plan.
The constitution doesn’t mention 270. When it was written there were only a small fraction of the EV we now have. All it says is a majority of “votes cast” is the requirement..
Even if the faithless electors switch, the House still has the final say...they do NOT have to accept a corrupted electoral college vote.
Oh tempora! Oh mores!
In Bush v. Gore, Breyer and Souter joined Kennedy and O’Connor and the three conservative Justices in ruling that the different recount standards in each county violated the Equal Protection Clause.
But even if Breyer had ‘t joined that opinion, it wouldn’t matter. Trump won, and nothing that they find in any recount will change that. There is no reason to think that the optical scanners in MI could have missed over 10,000, and even if they did, there’s no reason to suspect that the WI count was off by more than 24,000. And even if somehow both results are overturned, there still would be Trump’s comfortable volictory in PA, a state with no paper ballots, so Trump’s floor is 280 electoral votes. This whole recount thing is a find-raising and e-mail-address-gathering ploy by the Green Party. Conservative groups pull this kind of crap all the time (the part about fundraising for nonexistent threats, not the part about seeking ridiculous recounts), and the Greens want to join in the fun.
I’ve looked at county data in MI, WI and PA, and compared it to that in MN, IA and OH. I’ve akso looked at town-kevel data for MI (which became available in Leip’s site a coupke of days ago). The only potentially suspicious thing about the results in MI, WI and PA is tbat thrnout was lower than one would expect in Mikwaukee County and in the WOW collar counties to its north and west, albeit nit by enough that it would erase Trump’s lead. Part of the drop-off may have been due to a large number of blacks staying home because Obama wasn’t on the ballot and a smaller number of affluent whites staying home because they didn’t like Trump or Hillary (Romney ran much stronger in the WOW counties than did Trump, and the same was true for just about every other affluent suburban area—even the most rock-ribbed Republican—in the nation). But another contributing factor may have been the state’s voter-ID requirement. When did it come into effect?
Democrat dirty tricks department alive and well funded. Will they never stop and become Americans?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.