Skip to comments.
Bath-built destroyer breaks down, towed out of Panama Canal
BDN ^
| Nov 22, 2016
| Beth Brogan
Posted on 11/23/2016 3:17:01 AM PST by Daffynition
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: Grimmy
The Russian navy knows how to handle such problems. They simply have a tugboat escort for every ship that leaves port. Who tows the tugboats, though?
21
posted on
11/23/2016 4:10:07 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Daffynition
This never would have happened if the Navy had stuck with sails!!
22
posted on
11/23/2016 4:10:47 AM PST
by
catman67
(14 gauge?)
To: sit-rep
That bow is reminiscent of pre-dreadnought battleships, IMO.
23
posted on
11/23/2016 4:12:18 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: Grimmy
We’d need a “stealth tug” for the “Zumwalt”.
24
posted on
11/23/2016 4:12:20 AM PST
by
Tallguy
To: catman67
You are a blowhard, should never have given up oars.
25
posted on
11/23/2016 4:13:00 AM PST
by
Sawdring
To: waus
Looks like “highly survivable” doesn’t include seawater leaking from a shaft.
26
posted on
11/23/2016 4:13:39 AM PST
by
Tallguy
To: USNBandit
That has been one of my big concerns, the push towards greater automation of damage control and other systems.
Like you said, it is great when you have intact power supplies and infrastructure, but...when power is lost...or a missile takes out a section of wiring.
Sure, you can probably set up patch lines and such, but...that won’t be automated. Someone is going to have to do that.
And what about simply having people who can use timbers and such to plug holes in the hull?
Couple the automation with a higher percentage of female crewmembers who lack the physical strength of their male counterparts, and you have ships sinking when they might be saved.
I think it is a bad idea, and short-sighted. This whole thing is a damned goat rodeo.
27
posted on
11/23/2016 4:21:16 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
To: Daffynition
They had problems with their propulsion system before...during sea trials if I’m not mistaken, and took on water, also. 22 Billion - should never happen.
28
posted on
11/23/2016 4:22:20 AM PST
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Perhaps it should be renamed the USS Hillary Clinton.
29
posted on
11/23/2016 4:24:03 AM PST
by
dblshot
(I am John Galt.)
To: Daffynition
Where are all the FR folks making fun a few weeks ago about the Russian carrier needing to sail with a tugboat in its escort.
Sounds like the US Navy is achieving par with the Russian Navy.
30
posted on
11/23/2016 4:25:12 AM PST
by
PAR35
To: jacknhoo
31
posted on
11/23/2016 4:40:06 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
To: PAR35
32
posted on
11/23/2016 4:43:39 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
To: Reno89519
The US Navy claims the hull shows up on radar as being of similar size to a fishing boat, rather than being four times larger than the Isle of Wight ferry. Who knew?
33
posted on
11/23/2016 4:47:01 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
To: ClearCase_guy
34
posted on
11/23/2016 4:49:07 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
To: PapaBear3625
Who tows the tugboats, though?LOL. There's a Pixar movie their somewhere, cute Russian accents and all.
35
posted on
11/23/2016 4:51:06 AM PST
by
Stentor
To: Daffynition
36
posted on
11/23/2016 4:51:39 AM PST
by
JoeProBono
(SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
To: Grimmy
**Giving Her All She's Got Captain**
**She cannot take it, Captain Kirk!**
37
posted on
11/23/2016 4:52:03 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
To: ARGLOCKGUY
The water intrusion into bearings is a problem in the new LCS ships as well.
38
posted on
11/23/2016 4:53:54 AM PST
by
Bob
(No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not veauccomplishments; they're jobs.)
To: Jimmy Valentine
I think the ship had sea trials near Bath, Maine.
Bath Iron Works, BIW, makes excellent ships and always on-time or ahead of schedule and no cost over-runs and almost always under budget.
To: Daffynition
7 Billion 300 million bucks and it can’t even make it through its first oil change. The Navy Yugo?
40
posted on
11/23/2016 4:55:44 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson