Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whoa. Was that photo of Hillary Clinton and the woman on a hike a setup?
twitchy.com ^ | November 11, 2016 | Greg P.

Posted on 11/12/2016 9:22:30 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper

... According to this, Ms. Gerster has not only met with Clinton in the past, but worked for her, too:

(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: doesabearpoopinwoods; hillary2016; margotgerster; photoop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: reasonisfaith

Although I didn’t realize Hillary actually knew the woman.

What I figured was Bill and Hillary waited in the woods until an unsuspecting person walked by, and then they took photo ops with her.

Of course, this scenario would have involved too many uncontrollable factors. It makes much more sense that Hillary would use a known individual for the setup.


21 posted on 11/12/2016 9:36:08 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Is the Pope a Communist?
She can’t walk more than a block w/o passing out.

Pray for Trump


22 posted on 11/12/2016 9:39:12 PM PST by bray (The Silent Majority ROARED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Where is she?


23 posted on 11/12/2016 9:46:33 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24; Berlin_Freeper
Well, if Snopes hasn't debunked it, it must be true!
24 posted on 11/12/2016 9:47:14 PM PST by jonatron (Land of the Free, Home of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Yes. And I can almost guarantee it was taken BEFORE the election.


25 posted on 11/12/2016 9:49:15 PM PST by Captainpaintball (It appears that we no longer wish to keep our Republic, Mr. Franklin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
Who took the pic? Someone significantly taller than either of them. Why is Clinton wearing what looks like street shoes (no tread) to walk in the woods? The woman just happens to go for a walk in a coordinated outfit that matches her baby backpack, and has on makeup...for a walk in the woods. Who is the dog looking at, the SS agents? Why 720x960, that is a typical video resolution, not a common one for a spontaneous cell phone shot. This is probably a frame grab from a professional videographer using a DVC camcorder.

This is so obviously a setup it is insulting that they'd try to pass it off as some spontaneous "look I'm alright" thing.

26 posted on 11/12/2016 9:54:01 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Why are their heads so close together?


27 posted on 11/12/2016 9:55:22 PM PST by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; .45 Long Colt; simon says what; Jim Robinson

Yes it was a hoaxed photo-op and it was first outed here on Free Republic just two days ago by other Freepers but mostly .45 Long Colt and simon says what

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3492618/posts

The question is, what is Clinton doing or not doing that she needs a hoaxed “relaxed” photo op taken of her?

Guys, it’s all a hoax. Hoax media. BTW, when are they going to finish counting so we can brag that Trump won the popular vote, too?


28 posted on 11/12/2016 9:58:17 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
BTW, when are they going to finish counting so we can brag that Trump won the popular vote, too?

Trump will not end up ahead in the popular vote. Good chance he'll be around 1.5 million behind when they finish counting.

29 posted on 11/12/2016 10:01:21 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Maybe she’s a replacement for Huma.


30 posted on 11/12/2016 10:08:14 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Sorry, I’m not buying 1.5 million at all. It’s barely at 300,000 this afternoon.


31 posted on 11/12/2016 10:09:42 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

It’s actually near 700,000 lead for Hillary, with 4+ million remaining to be counted in CA and 700K in WA.


32 posted on 11/12/2016 10:10:50 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; 2banana; al baby; Salamander

Who wants to bet?

I say it was the “body double” from the 9/11 NYC street encounter.


33 posted on 11/12/2016 10:12:05 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: CatOwner

Where did you read that?


35 posted on 11/12/2016 10:14:13 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Forget *that*...why is Killary’s head so fekking HUGE??


36 posted on 11/12/2016 10:14:53 PM PST by Salamander (More Deplorable Than Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

What a damn shame it’s not electoral votes, instead.

/s


37 posted on 11/12/2016 10:15:48 PM PST by Salamander (More Deplorable Than Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

I wish the Trump Team and their surrogates who agree to be interviewed by the Marxist Media would point this out when they throw this in our face: If they subtract all the ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL, DEAD, and DUPLICATE votes, DJT won the true popular vote, and probably by millions of votes.

I am firmly convinced that if the voting process is not purged of its Soros contamination, we will never see another win again. It’s my understanding that the voting process in Germany is super secure. Maybe exploring their system might prove beneficial for us.


38 posted on 11/12/2016 10:15:55 PM PST by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

No, I’ve heard they just stop counting the absentee votes when they don’t matter to the election results. About 7 percent left to count. I believe Trump won popular vote, too.


39 posted on 11/12/2016 10:16:52 PM PST by Sontagged (Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
This site has close to the most up to date information on the election results:

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/

The ballots to be processed in CA and WA have been reported in various interviews with state election officers. If you look at the site above, a bit over 13 million votes were counted in CA for 2012. They currently have about 9.5 million in the tallies for 2016, so I would expect the numbers for 2016 to rise quite a bit.

40 posted on 11/12/2016 10:20:47 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson