Posted on 06/09/2016 9:09:01 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
Target’s annual shareholders meeting on Wednesday focused heavily on the company’s policy change allowing men who identify as women to use the women’s restroom. Many shareholders reportedly expressed their displeasure with the policy change and at least one shareholder publicly questioned whether the policy change is responsible for the company’s plummeting stock prices.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Well, duh. I haven't stepped foot in a Target since they started this child-harming policy. I never needed them anyway. When I need to pick up a quick pair of socks or something there's always plenty of other places to go shop.
If it quacks like a duck..........duh
Easy solution .....
(1) Replace upper management and change policy
or
(2) Sales their shares of Target.
Target is pro-child endangerment.
Awwww....Really????
Wonder why they feel that way???...../s
I wonder how much a woman raped by a man dressed as a woman in a Target restroom could sue Target for.
The shareholders deserve to lose their “ASS”ets for failing to call an emergency meeting when all this crap started.
We need bikers in tee shirts that say “I’m only here to use the Ladies Room” to hang out in front of Target.
At their peak in March...they were near $85 a share. If you review the past five years....they were continually ontrack to go upwards (2011, near $50). So it was a wise investment at one point and they typically paid a 3-percent dividend per year.
Today? They sit near $67.
The big owners....usually retirement funds...will hope that this is just temporary and things will be forgotten. If we get to the spring of 2017 and it’s still in the $67 range...this CEO will be let go, and likely paid some significant retirement package to just walk away.
C’mon. The real solution, and we all know it..is to place the blame squarely on local managers for their inability to integrate company policy by focusing on the inclusion of all peoples, and fire them immediately. They will all be replaced with agitators who will be given THE tacit approval of HILLARY! 2016 to literally beat the customers into submission while their partners kick them in the ribs. So suck-it America!
LOL...:o))
If Target resolves this in the near future, I don’t plan on going back. I really don’t need them.
Check chart . If it breaks through the $60 resistance, the next resistance is $50. I see they have a new line of LGBT clothing in the children’s section .
Actually it isn’t that easy. The psychologically disturbed crowd doesn’t have any problem with disrupting business, protesting, screaming, yelling, and otherwise chasing away patrons. Target has painted themselves into a corner. They are stuck in a position and they have to try to weather the storm. If they back down now, the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the left will be cacophonous. The amazing thing is, their CEO actually thought the company needed to create this mess instead of simply dealing with it on a case-by-case basis. Oh well, you’ll never see a member of my family in a Target store again.
I am going through all my mutual funds and dumping any that have the target on the juvenile or same sex butt.
“I wonder how much a woman raped by a man dressed as a woman in a Target restroom could sue Target for.”
Depends on which lawyer she gets. Hope it’s the best one in town.
I would be it would be redundant.
:)
I am surprised Target is not headed for a KMart style crater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.