Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musicians: "Politician X Can't use My Music" but Bakers/Photogs MUST let their creation be used?
5/25/16 | sff

Posted on 05/25/2016 2:44:02 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper

So I just saw little article about leftist 60s guy Neil Young who said Donald Trump couldn't use one of his songs...same thing with Aerosmith....

So, it just kind of struck me: Artist "Y" created something and THEN Trump purchases the CD/Music File/Record, whatever the material is upon which the recording is made...and then uses it for his OWN pleasure.

Artist Y hates Trump and says that even though the record can be bought and purchased, Trump cannot play it publicly. And that wish is respected.

Baker "J" creates cakes. Or photographer "G" creates stunning pictures. Can THEY not restrict the use of THEIR creations and services?

I know I am speaking to the choir here, by and large, but I wonder why the hypocrisy isn't plain and obvious.

Seriously. We have to respect the recording artist whose creations (they've made and sold by the millions) are out in the public. We must listen when they say "Don't use my song for X". But we don't have to respect the artist who creates cakes...or the artist who creates stunning photographs? *They* have to be enslaved and made to create their works for anyone....even if they disagree with the event for which the creation is made?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; hypocrisy; newyork; query; trump; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: SoFloFreeper

Yeah no kidding.

Sue their asses. Shut up and play the song.


21 posted on 05/25/2016 5:31:48 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Its the bakers labor too to bake the cake. Its their skills and labor that makes the cake.


22 posted on 05/25/2016 5:32:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: West Texas Chuck

Well Chuck, sorry to inform you but, over the years Mr. Petty (pun intended) has turned hard left in the political world. That’s the short version. Should you do some homework I’m sure you’ll find my statement to be true.
Regards,
Snoot ;o)


23 posted on 05/25/2016 6:06:07 PM PDT by snooter55 (People may doubt what you say, but they will always believe what you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: camle

“...when the dust settled, he was still using the song.”

I listened to him all the time back then and my recollection is that the singer’s parents were big fans and they complained to her about him not being able to use the song and she said, oh, well, if you guys want him to use it he can. But I could really not be remembering this correctly I have to say that too.


24 posted on 05/25/2016 6:51:50 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“The Civil Rights Act took that away...”

This is correct. But never worry, the lefties will have us all segregated again ASAP.

Or.....something like that!


25 posted on 05/25/2016 6:53:14 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Interesting vanity. Thanks SoFloFreeper.

26 posted on 05/26/2016 4:50:36 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Baker "J" creates cakes. Or photographer "G" creates stunning pictures. Can THEY not restrict the use of THEIR creations and services?

Copyright... first North American rights etc. Yes, it can be done. On the cheap, take a picture, put it an a sealed envelope and mail it to yourself... Open it in a court of law..

27 posted on 05/26/2016 6:49:15 AM PDT by GOPJ (Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson