Is she just reinforcing the Steriotype that Women can't deal with Economic Issues @ScottAdamsSays? https://t.co/FfpAc7udQd— brandwarrior (@RightBrandOne) May 16, 2016
Persuasion blunder. Again. https://t.co/zAY8tpwOyZ— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) May 16, 2016
Great headline.
I think someone should point out that Newt Gingrich and the GOP Congress voted in in 1994 is really who she should be putting in charge of the fed’s handling of the economy—if she wants to bring back Bill’s Golden Era.
As if Hillary would ever give Bill the checkbook.
This just reinforces the notion that maybe, Herself may not quite as smart as others have made her out to be.
In over her head, Herself if floundering and twisting like a drowning person, panicked and unable to act even to save Herself.
Proposals that are both incompatible with historic US principles, and fiscally impossible to achieve even in a favorable economic climate, continue to pour forth, in an attempt to outflank her one remaining rival within the Democratic party, Bernie Sanders. Bernie, at least, is sincere in his attempt to initiate this revolutionary economic program, but Herself embraces similar goals with a most cynical attitude, in that how this may secure even more personal differentials to benefit a very small elite minority.
“She’ll Put Her Husband in Charge of the Economy”
I seemed to miss that part of the constitution where the president has the authority to put ones spouse, or anyone else, in charge of the economy.
If it weren’t for Speaker Newt, Clinton’s economy would amount to squat. Clinton was a skirt chaser whose only work in the White House was dodging the flying furnishings from the hysterical Hildebeast as she learned about his latest romp.
Well, if he gives $800,000 of taxpayer money to every bimbo he has sex with - well, it’s kinda like a government works program.
Here's the difference: Ivanka has had a lot of opportunities because of family. But it's terrific. Why?? She's competent, professional, and an excellent representative of her family.
I keep saying it. Are women going to want their daughters and granddaughters to look at Marlina and Ivanka as role models, or hillary and Chelsea?
Hillary must have been in love with the Politburo’s “Five Year Plans” ever since she ‘joined’ a local “Communist Youth” group as a teenager.
No wonder she thinks in terms of putting someone “in charge of the economy”.
And just as clearly, she has no conception of how the US economy works.
Rather, she’s as much of a “cargo cultist” as Obama himself.
Won’t work unless you have Newt as the Speaker driving the economy.
The economy is driven by what the Congress does, NOT by who sits in the White House. The Clintons had/have no clue. The only thing the Clinton’s know is how to sell their elective/appointed offices to those seeking influence. They don’t care who their customer is or what their clients ultimate goals are as long as the Clintons stay in a position of power and/or money.
Czar of Women’s Wear
It’s not a matter of surrendering feminism. The American people nearly all think that Mr. Bill was responsible for a “good economy” even if he wasn’t. The people don’t know.
So... presumably he’ll be using our tax dollars to pay for his hookers....?