Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S&W Body Guard Trigger Pull
vanity | 4/20/16 | sdpatriot

Posted on 04/20/2016 10:41:00 PM PDT by sdpatriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: lapsus calami

thank you, i appreciate your advise on this..


21 posted on 04/20/2016 11:15:31 PM PDT by sdpatriot ("Thank you very much, sdpatriot!! Smooch!" - from JR - send him a buck!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

thanks so much for that link..... don’t know why i waited so long to ask FR banglist guys for help on this....


22 posted on 04/20/2016 11:17:52 PM PDT by sdpatriot ("Thank you very much, sdpatriot!! Smooch!" - from JR - send him a buck!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
 
 
Yep - always find some - they are usually fine, use magnification to see them, but they are there. I like to do a surface polish to make sure sharp grabby edges are dealt with - am not trying to remove them, that would mess with tolerances. Just dull it down, to help reduce friction forces, nothing major. Like polishing the rebound slide on the frame side too so that there's plenty of slip & slide to be had. Every little itty bit helps.
 
 

23 posted on 04/20/2016 11:20:42 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

i’ll check around...... thanks so much for you advise on this..


24 posted on 04/20/2016 11:23:34 PM PDT by sdpatriot ("Thank you very much, sdpatriot!! Smooch!" - from JR - send him a buck!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

Your Bodyguard’s trigger pull is working as intended. This is a gun made for use at near contact ranges. Inside of twenty feet. It’s just fine as it is right now for a self defense gun. I have a friend who bought one and didn’t like it. He loaned it to me to get my opinion but I found I actually liked it. He then wanted to make a trade with me but I ultimately turned him down.

If it were ME who wanted a .38 snub-nose revolver for CCW — and I don’t — I’d try to find a vintage 5-shot S&W Model 36 Chief’s Special. There are so many out there in great condition. The ones made in the ‘50s and ‘60s have really nice fit and finish. I’d get the Nickel because it’s a little easier to clean. Their only downside is that they hold their value and people want all the money they can get for them. Only reason I don’t have one is that I don’t want to pay what they cost. Only reason I wouldn’t carry one is that I have a compact .45 that I trust.

My advice to you is to just learn your trigger, double-action only. If there’s one thing to say about someone who chooses a small revolver for self defense is that their pistol is absolutely going to work when needed unless somehow their assailant can grab the cylinder to prevent it from turning. I prefer bigger sidearms because they’re easier to get a handle on when you need to grab it and anyone in a self-defense situation can pretty much count on having to grapple and fight hand to hand with an assailant.


25 posted on 04/20/2016 11:45:53 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
I' d find a gunsmith that has gone through S&W's armorer school. They would be best educated at giving you what you want.

The Dept I use to work for in the 80's had one and the guy could tune a Md 66 real fine ;-)

Ed

26 posted on 04/21/2016 12:18:09 AM PDT by husky ed (FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

26 replies on a technical firearms question at 2:00 am. Only on FR!


27 posted on 04/21/2016 12:28:56 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

>> i do love the laser sight..

Use it to train your trigger pull:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN1XxFzgi8U

https://www.crimsontrace.com/about-our-lasers/lasers-for-training/

Also check out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwOzjH1sOuc


28 posted on 04/21/2016 1:17:06 AM PDT by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

try practicing with it.


29 posted on 04/21/2016 2:06:02 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave; sdpatriot
Why Smith & Wesson will never be rid of the internal lock

Is the Smith & Wesson Internal Lock a Deal Breaker?


30 posted on 04/21/2016 2:33:52 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Re-posting workable link:

Why Smith & Wesson will never be rid of the internal lock

31 posted on 04/21/2016 2:34:49 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
Thoug the heavy trigger is by design, and in the likely use of the weapon pulling a little to the right likely won't be an issue. However if you like it otherwise and want a revolver, you might consider the S&W 638 which has a shrouded rather than internal hammer thus allows for single action fire. Lousy picture, but the hammer projects slightly above the shroud


32 posted on 04/21/2016 2:53:28 AM PDT by SJackson (Oh my God, she's so beautiful and she's so little!, Huma first impression of Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

My wife carries a stainless 2 1/2” Speed Six, it’s a medium frame so it’s fairly light. And, has an exposed hammer. So, I’ve taught her to fire her first shot as single action being first shot is most critical one. Concerning the exposed hammer, she’s never had a problem with it snagging on anything. FYI, sadly, the Speed Six is out of production. But, there are similar pistols that are in production to consider. Btw, imho the double/double semi is the worse choice possible. Wouldn’t take one if it was a Christmas present.


33 posted on 04/21/2016 3:02:39 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
f it were ME who wanted a .38 snub-nose revolver for CCW — and I don’t — I’d try to find a vintage 5-shot S&W Model 36 Chief’s Special. There are so many out there in great condition. The ones made in the ‘50s and ‘60s have really nice fit and finish. I’d get the Nickel because it’s a little easier to clean.

If it were ME, and it is, I would look for a S&W Model 60 Chief's Special, and they have all of the advantages of the Model 36, only in Stainless Steel. They can be had in the classic S&W quality if you buy used up to the mid '80s, or you can buy a new one today if you don't mind MIM parts and the internal lock.

I inherited my Model 60 from my Father, and it was made in 1986.

34 posted on 04/21/2016 3:06:49 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
i needed a revolver for my purse/holster/truck that i could beat up and get dirty and still count on.... Semi’s are ok in the bedside drawer or when i am good about cleaning them ...... but for just constant abuse i want a revolver...

There is nothing wrong with a semi-auto for a truck gun, a purse gun, or for holster carry.

I wouldn't recommend the Bodyguard 380, but if you're a Smith girl I would recommend the S&W Shield in 9mm for carry and on body concealment, and the S&W M&P in 9mm for the nightstand.

Me, I prefer Glocks, and I would recommend the Glock 42 in .380 (my wife's gun of choice), the Glock 43 in 9mm (similar in all respects to the Shield,) and the Glock 19 in 9mm (similar to the M&P.)

Semi-autos can be just as tough and take just as much abuse as any revolver, and maybe more. Look at the exposed cylinder face on your revolver, then imagine what would happen if it got dropped in the mud or snow. Almost all modern semi-autos pass the drop in the mud test with flying colors (and flying mud in your face when you fire the first round!)

35 posted on 04/21/2016 3:36:47 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

I once blindly relied on the S&W mark also. But over the course of acquiring near 20 S&W revolvers built all the way from 1917 up through last year, my practice now is to examine the revolver very very closely before purchase.

I take range rods, check cylinder end shake, excessive turn lines and cylinder rattle, etc. If the shop won’t let me do that I don’t buy it. Most brand new are acceptable but I have run across several that just didn’t make the grade.

Why do I do this now? I bought a Model 22-5 of a US 1917 revolver to match the real one I own. It had to be ordered from S&W and over $1000. It finally came and guess what? They omitted and entire machining operation - no lanyard ring, not even drilled for one. It took another two month trip back and forth to get that fixed.

And on a JM 625, the extractor rod spindle housing was misaligned in tightening and it kept backing off during firing, eventually locking up the cylinder from turning. Several other guns had issues associated with quality that didn’t meet the name reputation IMO.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a ‘thing’ against S&W, if I did, I wouldn’t have so many of them. But these guns are more expensive than others and I expect more. Overall, they are excellent.

Lastly, if the trigger pull is too hard, be glad you don’t have a Mosin Nagan 1892 gas-seal revolver. Its pull on a double action shot is very, very high - my trigger pull gauge maxes out at like 15 lbs on it.


36 posted on 04/21/2016 3:53:18 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
don’t need no stinking warranty..... just want to aim small..... miss small... well, as much as i can with a 38 snubby ;) i do love the laser sight..

Just watched the movie again last night - this time with the wife who loved it.

Do you shoot one-handed or use the other hand as a brace? With a gun like the Defender, the main intent is more defense than target accuracy. I suggest practicing and learning to compensate - it will change over time if a lot of rounds go through it but most of us put through enough rounds to "sight it in" then occasionally shoot it from time to time. I shoot my defense weapons (compact 380 autos) more for stayng in a 6" circle at 25' but can stay inside 3' if I take my time. Then I have the weapons that allow some real accuracy 1911 made in 1914 for instance and a .357 with long barrel - both are more accurate than I am as I age.

37 posted on 04/21/2016 4:47:23 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Ping,


38 posted on 04/21/2016 4:56:22 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

Show it a picture of Hillary.....


39 posted on 04/21/2016 5:01:42 AM PDT by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

My brother has two S&W Model 28s. The only difference is that one of them had a trigger job done at the S&W Custom shop. If you shot both of them you would swear that the one from the custom shop has a much light trigger pull, but they’re both 7 lbs. It’s just the custom 28 is so smooth it seems much lighter.


40 posted on 04/21/2016 5:54:53 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson