Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary: Halt all fossil fuel extraction on federal lands
canadafreepress.com ^ | 2/7/2016 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 02/07/2016 5:40:33 AM PST by rktman

If you enjoyed paying $1.59 a gallon for gas this past weekend, understand a few things. To the extent domestic production affects this, the oil industry is mostly gettings its resources on private lands. That's because Obama, while he's happy to take credit for the increased productivity and lower prices, is fighting new leases on federal lands wherever he can. That's how he can reassure his left-wing base he's an enemy of the oil industry while also taking credit for the low prices.

But there is some oil being extracted on federal lands, and if that stopped all at once, it would definitely have a significant and negative impact on prices. And according to Hillary Clinton, that's exactly what she would do if she became president:

blockquote class="twitter-tweet">

BREAKING: @HillaryClinton would impose a moratorium on fossil fuel extraction on federal lands #fitn pic.twitter.com/Tk3pCrnNeI

- 350 Action (@350action) February 5, 2016

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Reference; Science
KEYWORDS: idiot; ourlands
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Federal lands eh. The same federal lands that the govt wants to keep taxpayers off of? And the idiocy continues unabated. Don't know about the rest of you but the reduction in gas prices has helped us economically. Despite the admins touting the robust economy, I'm pretty sure there's a lot of common everyday folks that would take exception to those proclamations. As to the lyin' king and his idea to add $10/barrel tax, I say BS. I think I heard that would be an additional 25 cents per gallon at our end. Uh, no thanks. So, whether you think it will do any good or not, let you congress critters know you DO NOT support another tax. Once it's in place, you know it will never go away. And if you don't know anything about "350 Action", check them out.
1 posted on 02/07/2016 5:40:33 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

All public land, other than military and test bases should be either turned over to the states or opened up to homesteading to legal residents who have lived in the USA no less than ten years.


2 posted on 02/07/2016 5:47:02 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Get the central socialist government out of the land business!

Return all lands to the states in which they’re located.


3 posted on 02/07/2016 5:49:40 AM PST by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

$1.39 for Regular at a station yesterday - I paid $1.90 for Premium - woo hoo!


4 posted on 02/07/2016 5:51:04 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Opecker Princes probably dropped off another Million $s in the Clintoon Slush funds for that statement. They will drop off more if she gets elected.


5 posted on 02/07/2016 5:51:05 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Delegate count to date: CMruz 8, Trump 7, Rubio 7, Carson 3, Bush 1, Paul 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

It’s all about control of every facit of Americans lives. Also, any time we start to get a little bit financially ahead, liberals throw obsticles against us financially. They think they can spend our money better than we can. They just want to keep their ham fist against us.


6 posted on 02/07/2016 5:52:14 AM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Where in the Constitution does it say the federal government can own a third of the property in western states? This should never have been allowed. Since the National Parks are accessible to the people, they can remain, but all other “federal lands” should be sold to the highest bidder. That would pay off a fraction of our massive, suffocating national debt wracked up by that federal government.


7 posted on 02/07/2016 5:52:25 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

I agree.


8 posted on 02/07/2016 5:54:45 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Doesn’t look like Reno is gonna catch up in that way. Regular is still around $2.19/gal. Still a lot better than the $3.89/gal not that long ago. (And, what if the petroleum on federal lands is abiotic?) :>)


9 posted on 02/07/2016 5:57:31 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Agreed.
There is no excuse for We the People allowing the Federals to own so much of this country.
How do we change this? I do not know.
Electing the same old, same old ain’t gonna do it.
Armed squatting as they are doing in Oregon will just get you killed by their over whelming force.
Seceding will get millions killed as we saw in 1861-1865. Then it was hundreds of thousands, today would be 5-10 times as many.
As I stated, I do not know the answer, but we need to come up with one pronto.


10 posted on 02/07/2016 6:00:55 AM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
(And, what if the petroleum on federal lands is abiotic?) :>)

LOL!

I guess they would decree it as a rare form of abiotic biota and in need of utmost protection...

11 posted on 02/07/2016 6:02:19 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Agreed, but my only other thought is to bundle up the land and auction it off in parcels, like is done with the radio frequencies. That was it can help our debt a small amount and ensure people like the green organization have their chance put their money where their mouths are. If they want to keep land from productive uses the can buy it and then pay the states their ongoing property taxes. Not sure about free to homesteaders, seems like the tax payer should receive some benefit from the asset. Maybe some rent over time. I could imagine a bunch of illegal residents attempting to become homesteaders.


12 posted on 02/07/2016 6:02:44 AM PST by joedish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Won’t this hurt the “poor?”

Oh wait, they will get a $15.00 hr minimum wage so they should be able to pay for it.


13 posted on 02/07/2016 6:02:52 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/environmentalists-allow-oil-drilling-on-their-land-but-oppose-it-in-anwr/

“However, despite opposing oil drilling in ANWR, one of these environmental groups allowed oil drilling on lands that it owns, reaping sizeable revenues from its production. The National Audubon Society, who opposes oil drilling in ANWR, has allowed oil and gas drilling on its 26,000 acre Paul J. Rainy Sanctuary in Louisiana for nearly 50 years. Beginning in the 1940s, oil companies drilled 37 wells in the sanctuary, which protects important habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife.[ii]

The National Audubon Society received royalties of over $25 million, which it used to buy additional land. The drilling in the Paul J. Rainy Sanctuary was performed in an environmentally safe manner, but that could also be accomplished in ANWR, if only the federal government would allow drilling there.


14 posted on 02/07/2016 6:12:33 AM PST by Captain7seas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Fossil Fuels, LNG, What’s the facts? Jacki Daily Show!
On this episode of the Jacki Daily Show, Jacki is joined by Anne Korin the co-author of Petropoly.
https://soundcloud.com/jacki-daily/fossil-fuel-natural-gas-lowers-carbon-emissions
.
Moral Case for Fossil Fuels; Restricting Them Means Loss of Human Life “ Ethanol Mandate Kills Jobs
Interviews include Alex Epstein, Author of the Moral Case for Fossil Fuels
https://soundcloud.com/jacki-daily/moral-case-for-fossil-fuels-restricting-them-means-loss-of-human-life-ethanol-mandate-kills-jobs
.
Jim Amos, Chairman of Proctor & Gamble’s Franchising Division
“Switch the movie Can we switch from fossil fuels to renewables?

UPDATED “ Scott Tinker talks world population growth and the energy mix that will meet its demand over the next decades.
http://jackidaily.com/2015/04/04/switch-the-movie-can-we-switch-from-fossil-fuels-to-renewables/
.
https://soundcloud.com/jacki-daily/fossil-fuel-natural-gas-lowers-carbon-emissions


15 posted on 02/07/2016 6:14:45 AM PST by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

I even have a problem with ‘National Parks’. Follow the Constitution and return it all to the State to whom it resides. Sorry, it means what it says, or it’s just ink on parchment; can’t have it both ways.

Then, the State will decide. THEY can request contributions to keep XYZ open, sell it off, etc.


16 posted on 02/07/2016 6:22:15 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

How do you change it?

Pressure your State to file to return all lands (illegally) held.

Course, very few States want to ‘rock the boat’, that might cut off the gravy train of $$ when the Fed gives ‘em the evil eye.


17 posted on 02/07/2016 6:23:50 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The states need to take their land back. For example, 90% of Nevada is under federal control. That’s why ranchers are being gunned down.


18 posted on 02/07/2016 6:24:21 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

I agree wholeheartedly with your post #16. I don’t hear any of the candidates in this election cycle talking about this, except for the tangent discussions about eminent domain. Time for the free market conservatives to talk this up, so we can distinguish them from the uniparty spies.


19 posted on 02/07/2016 6:31:23 AM PST by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Right. That way she can sell the rights to it to a foreign government in exchange for generous donations to The Clinton Foundation.


20 posted on 02/07/2016 6:32:34 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson