Posted on 02/03/2016 7:02:22 PM PST by Be Careful
Clinton Foundation played pivotal role in securing Uranium One deal with Russia
During that time, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. After Russia announced its plan to take over Uranium One, former President Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin.
(Excerpt) Read more at newstarget.com ...
More likely the Russians would want the land to be taken by the feds and added to the refuge. One less source of Uranium.
Not this again.
This information is sourced to a single conspiracy blogger.
The Aurora project referenced is located in the Pueblo mountains located in the southeast Oregon bordering on Nevada.
It is “not on or near the Hammond ranch”. In fact it is over 100 miles from the Hammond ranch.
There is no geological support for uranium under the Hammond ranch.
If there was uranium, the Hammonds would be mining it.
The Federals have expressed no interest in obtaining the Hammond ranch, since the original offer of an exchange many years ago.
This has pretty much been overshadowed by the Primaries. You’d think the candidates for the Republican nomination would be discussing issues like these that show the Clinton’s for what they really are. . . a bunch of da#n crooks.
More facts:
The Hammond Ranch is on the high plateau on the western slopes of the Steen Mountains.
Uranium mining occurs on the eastern drop-off on both the Steen and Pueblo mountains, not the western side.
That is because of geological folding.
The Aurora project was put on hold because of the environmentalists concern for the sage grouse.
If anything, the environmentalists (and the current Feds) are enemies of both mining and cattle interests, and not each other.
More likely, it is about agent procurators conspiring to get Ranchers to commit illegal acts, so they can be slapped down.
So true. This whole thing is continuing operation to get ranchers and miners off public land. They are attempting to depopulate the West.
I'm not going to claim to be an expert on this OR situation, but it is painfully obvious that the Feds are trying to drive the Hammonds off of their land. And this type of nonsense is happening in other Western states, which is what has led to the Bundy Bunch taking over that refuge. Should they be there? Probably not, but no pols, including that RINO loser Greg Walden, are paying any attention under normal circumstances.
A major point is Fed overreach that illegally usurps States’ rights.
Yes, that is an openly state goal of a number of groups.
They even take roads that existed on old maps, off of new ones, so they can claim there is no public right of way there.
Nasty stuff.
There are agent provocateurs on FreeRepublic.
The Seattle Times is not a blog.
Well you almost got that right.
The Seattle Times is not a blog.
I don't think you understand. The original article and information is sourced to Intellihub
That it has been repeated by dozens of blogs and news sites does not change that the entire story is an invention of a single person.
hammond-ranch-may-be-sitting-on-precious-metals-materials-the-blm-wants
clinton-foundation-payoffs-promised-hammond-ranch-other-publically-owned-lands-russia
key-fact-hammonds-targeted-government-wants-steal-land
I followed the links in the article and laughed at the juvenile attempt to connect dots that just can't be connected. There's your agent provocateur.
Yes. They are trying to get MrGG2’s mine right now. He and his two partners are trying to keep it tied up in court til hopefully Trump gets elected.
I understand YOU perfectly well.
The Seattle Times published the article in April 2015 based on a NY Times article, ... and the blogs followed suit in January 2016.
Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians gained U.S. uranium assets
The New York Times’ examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, and a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States.
Originally published April 23, 2015 at 8:55 pm | Updated May 4, 2015 at 2:41 pm
Do you really? What's the connection between the NYT article and the Hammond ranch?
Answer: Absolutely nothing.
Article is poorly written and factually wrong but the feds do want the Hammonds ranch.
Yep.
Beware.
As with the Escalante Staircase National Monument in Utah. That little deal locked up 7 billion tons of coal after a "campaign donation" to Clinton by the Indonesian Lippo conglomerate, who has wide coal interests.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.