Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'doomsday' weapon that could wipe out 90% of Americans
Daily Mail ^ | 10/5/15 | Mark Prigg

Posted on 10/05/2015 1:06:40 PM PDT by Kartographer

Controversial tech boss and presidential candidate John McAfee has warned a 'doomsday' electronic weapon could wipe out 90% of Americans and urged politicians to is the number one threat facing the country.

McAfee, who recently announced he is running in 2016, wrote in a blog for Business Insider: 'Experts agree that an all out cyber attack, beginning with an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) attack on our electronic infrastructure, would wipe out 90% of the human population of this country within two years of the attack.

'That means the death of 270 million people within 24 months after the attack.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3260935/The-doomsday-weapon-wipe-90-Americans-Eccentric-tech-millionaire-presidential-candidate-John-McAfee-says-country-ill-prepared-electromagnetic-attacks.html#ixzz3nj4RcnO8 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Science
KEYWORDS: doomsday; electronic; emp; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Kartographer

This is ridiculous.


21 posted on 10/05/2015 1:23:48 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

It’s real, but it’s not effective as a weapon. The range is too small and the altitudes are too tough. 60,000 feet is a lot higher up than it sounds, and actually unless it’s really big nukes you wouldn’t actually destroy much of anything.

No, they don’t. The whole “back to the stone age” thing is quite simply a fiction. Would not happen. A lie from fear mongers.


22 posted on 10/05/2015 1:24:15 PM PDT by discostu (dream big and dance a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

So why did they build it?


23 posted on 10/05/2015 1:24:36 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“Democrat population control weapon to save the earth from Global Warming”

Aw, ya think?

One of the great shibboleths of the liberal mindset is that somehow, humanity will outstrip the capability of the earth to supply all the wants and needs of a burdgeoning population, creating a degree of want and famine beyond any that the world has ever known. Therefore, to forestall this all but certain calamity, the numbers have to be reduced NOW, that future generations do not continue to plunder the planet, and leave it, finally, an empty and sterile husk.

Ain’t gonna happen. Clever humans find a way to use a new and previously untapped source of energy, or raw materials that may be turned into useful production of food, shelter and expansion of horizons.

Thomas Malthus was far too pessimistic about the future of humanity.


24 posted on 10/05/2015 1:25:02 PM PDT by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Boeing built what appears to be a very focused weapon. It would not destroy a country’s electronic systems and cause 90% of its population to die. Just because there are some facts in a story doesn’t mean the overall headline, story, and point are BS.


25 posted on 10/05/2015 1:25:03 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

The same thing with the advertized AMERICAN WARNING.

They will tell you what it is if you send 79.95.


26 posted on 10/05/2015 1:26:07 PM PDT by Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Let's see... Option 1) Spend billions more to deploy a device that may or may not actually result in the desired effects, as really, we're simply talking theory at this point with a few scattered tests to give validity to the theory.

Option 2) Use the billions already spent on nuclear devices to deliver a devastating neutron blast on the target(s).

Both option 1 & 2 result in an immediate response of launching pretty much anything and everything to turn your country into a irradiated parking lot, no matter what the occupier of the White House might have to say about the matter.

To counter this threat, we again make up theories as to what might actually work and deploy it nationally, spending trillions on a possibility that is far less likely than a nuclear exchange.

Then again, we spend billions with McAfee for protection against trojans, viruses, and other programs that are only likely if the user is actively visiting sites that involve illegal activities. In exchange, we sacrifice roughly 20% of our normal computing power and 15% of our computing memory to their bloatware - which actually doesn't work against anything new until after it has already delivered it's payload.

27 posted on 10/05/2015 1:29:02 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
[discussing the Doomsday machine] President Merkin Muffley: How is it possible for this thing to be triggered automatically and at the same time impossible to untrigger? Dr. Strangelove: Mr. President, it is not only possible, it is essential. That is the whole idea of this machine, you know. Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy... the FEAR to attack. And so, because of the automated and irrevocable decision-making process which rules out human meddling, the Doomsday machine is terrifying and simple to understand... and completely credible and convincing. Dr Strangelove photo: Dr Strangelove 02 DrStrangelove02.jpg Dr. Strangelove: Sir! I have a plan! [standing up from his wheelchair] Dr. Strangelove: Mein Führer! I can walk!
28 posted on 10/05/2015 1:29:10 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla; All
Two well placed relatively low yield nukes at 60,000 feet, one over Ohio, and one over a western Nebraska would destroy our electric grid and all unprotected electronics.

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that this is actually a thing.
29 posted on 10/05/2015 1:30:40 PM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

‘That means the death of 270 million people within 24 months after the attack.’

Excellent! More supplies, water, fuel and peace and quiet for ME! :)


30 posted on 10/05/2015 1:32:09 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Anyone who doubts this is real should read this book:

http://www.onesecondafter.com/

31 posted on 10/05/2015 1:34:45 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

32 posted on 10/05/2015 1:37:23 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Wrong. You’re overlooking some weird physics, which make it possible with only two EMP weapons.

Check out what the EMP Commission found:

http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/security/has204000.000/has204000_0.HTM


33 posted on 10/05/2015 1:38:19 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Do you have any clue how many thousands of those there are? And those are already built to hand huge voltages and LIGHTENING STRIKES. Some jumped up microwave oven on a drone might take out some office building full of laptops but it ain’t going to do squat to a transformer farm.


34 posted on 10/05/2015 1:40:11 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: discostu
> With McAfee pushing this we now know for certain it’s simply not a problem. His whole company is built on selling fear.

John McAfee hasn't had anything whatsoever to do with McAfee the company and the bassturds that took it over, in 15 years.

He hates them.

He may be a fruitcake on his own, of course. But his positions have nothing to do with the company that bought and bears his name.

35 posted on 10/05/2015 1:41:07 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

EMP does not hurt people, only electronic devices of the solid state variety.


36 posted on 10/05/2015 1:42:17 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu; Sasparilla

Most car electronics would survive or be fixable in a matter of hours. A lot of PCs would survive, heck so would many cell phones. The cellular infrastructure might even survive since those towers can take lightening strikes. Yeah it would cause billions in damage and lost data but that is hardly the ‘stone age’.


37 posted on 10/05/2015 1:43:41 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

The say it will take out tanks.


38 posted on 10/05/2015 1:45:02 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
> EMP does not hurt people, only electronic devices of the solid state variety.

So the only thing left standing will be old TUBE-based guitar amplifers.

I see one Awesome jam ahead.

39 posted on 10/05/2015 1:45:31 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

He also bought and lived in Belize for years ( until something happened, I don’t know what) and it was probably because he was preparing for such an event. Belize is sparsely populated, cheap, has lots of water and arable land, and outside of the Belize City, it is pretty safe ( or so I’ve read.) The Mennonites have settled there and farm and make furniture. it’s back to basic folks.


40 posted on 10/05/2015 1:47:58 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson