Posted on 09/13/2015 1:10:19 PM PDT by Din Maker
I stood up for Kim Davis, the County Clerk in Kentucky who went to jail for her "faith" for refusing to issue Marriage Licenses to same-sex couples. However, I'm sure everyone knows by now that Kim Davis announced that she is a life-long Democrat. What's up with that? She spends her entire life supporting a Party, and politicians, who propagate Homo marriages AND killing little unborn babies in the womb; now she gets all "holy". That is hypocrisy in the highest form.
Yawn.
Wake me up when you have a point.
Don’t hold back, Vendome, tell us how you really feel
So what? You agree and defend it?
The 14th has nothing to do with this, and you know it.
Further more, the "judge" stated that the court supersedes God and Natures law, you agree with that too?
Wow dude, whose side are you on?
You can bow to your master, I will fight.
You have not argued the point that KY has no separation clause, curious that. The Fed cannot alter State law, KY marriage law was struck down in its entirety.
It’s one thing to think Homos should do their own thing without being accosted by mean people.
It’s another to believe they will or should get special rights to persecute Christians and force them to condone the lifestyle. Many did not dream of the Supreme Court going off the deep end and choosing the anal action over religious freedom.
I think you are faking your support of her cause or you aren’t that smart. It is not about her and whether she’s perfect or not. No Christian is perfect and yet imperfect Christians need to stand up for religious freedom and support one another. It’s about Christians being forced by homos and the courts to participate in gay marriage and the gay lifestyle however dictated.
It also is about a Christians right not to participate in chipping, pedophilia, abortion or euthanasia or whatever other evil the uniparty globalists decides we must all buckle under to their dictates and support.
You should get out some.
Guy is an idiot.
"The larger issue than Kim Davis is the USSC making up law out of whole cloth and assuming the role of Congress.”
onedoug, if I understood your remark about Congress correctly, please note that, with the exception of the “Full Faith and Credit clause (4.1), the states have never amended the Constitution to give Congress the specific power to regulate marriage. So activist justices actually breached the Founding States division of federal and state government powers and stole 10A-protected state powers to legislate the so-called right to gay marriage from the bench.
In other words, as Din Maker had noted in another post, and what activist justices wrongly ignored is that, since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay “marriage” as a right, it’s up to the individual states, based on their 10th Amendment-protected power, and not activist justices, to say yes or no to constitutionally unprotected gay “marriage.”
The jail release show with Huckabee ws first time I heard her speak. I thought she is either somewhat neurotic, or acting. Maybe I am wrong, and she was just excited because of the hub hub and feeling good about taking a stand, but she rubbed me the wrong way.
Now, now, ozzymandus. You know how this goes: They eat their own. They always do.
Blinded by stupidity? Yes. Incapable of thinking straight due to the stupidity? “You betcha?”
It’s all so predictable. But, entertaining.
Thank you for making the issue even more clear.
Mr Rogers answered your question.
If you feel that this isn’t the case, ask yourself this:
Loving vs. Virginia, striking down interracial marriage bans was decided in the 1960s. Some states, including South Carolina and Alabama, didn’t get around to changing their laws until 1998 & 2000, respectively.
Are you arguing that all marriages from the mid-1960s until 1998/2000 in those states are invalid?
No, gay marriage isn’t the same as interracial marriage, but the laws were overturned in the exact same manner.
So, if I got married in South Carolina a decade before the law finally changed in the late 90’s, is my marriage valid?
I wish that traditional one man, one woman marriage trumped the Constitution, including the 10th Amendment. But I don’t know how to argue that based on what I know about the Constitution.
“So what? You agree and defend it?”
Well, given that I already told you: “Given their decision had zero legal reasoning and made no effort to apply the Constitution...”, MY thoughts are pretty clear.
“You have not argued the point that KY has no separation clause, curious that. The Fed cannot alter State law, KY marriage law was struck down in its entirety.”
No, that is NOT how it works. The only thing the court invalidated was a requirement that applicants be heterosexual. The marriage law was not struck down in its entirety. If you cannot figure that out, then I suggest you go find something to do besides post utter nonsense.
Running off with your tail between your legs?
Sissy boy. You have no honor.
So the Supreme Court decision struck down 1(d) and left the rest in place.
Thanks, I appreciate it!
I believe its actually in the Constitution, in the Preamble: “...and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity....”
Note the capitalization of “Posterity”, which homosexual relationships are incapable of producing.
STFU you syphillis-laden cloud-teething freakshow, before I bat you around the shoulders with a rotting fish.
LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.