Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I think that I shall never see.....................
1 posted on 09/02/2015 10:56:17 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Red Badger

7.5x more than scientists thought

lol


2 posted on 09/02/2015 10:57:16 AM PDT by GeronL (Cruz is for real, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Let’s penalize North Africa, Saudi Arabia and India for not growing enough trees.


4 posted on 09/02/2015 10:59:25 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Let’s penalize North Africa, Saudi Arabia and India for not growing enough trees.


5 posted on 09/02/2015 10:59:25 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Let’s not pretend that desert expansion is a result of human activity.


6 posted on 09/02/2015 11:00:27 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We could establish goals of x trees per square mile and send them a democrat for every square mile that doesn’t meet the goal.


8 posted on 09/02/2015 11:01:36 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

A truly renewable fuel source.


9 posted on 09/02/2015 11:02:00 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I miss my dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How large does a tree have to be to count?


11 posted on 09/02/2015 11:05:27 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

This is the other part of the global climate debate that no one talks about in politics:

Land Use. The impact of agriculture vs. forests on CO2 levels.

Perhaps this is more of a culprit, for CO2 rise, than American SUVs?

Who knows?

But then again, CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, (methane and water vapor are), so why are we talking about land use, unless we talk about its impact on methane and water vapor?


12 posted on 09/02/2015 11:05:44 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

3 trillion trees take up a LOT of earth-warming CO2.

We may be heading toward another ice age!
:O!


14 posted on 09/02/2015 11:06:24 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

There are 7.5 times as many trees as previously thought, but....
There are half as many trees as there were before people.

First - poor estimates strain the credibility of the estimates.

Second - most of the deforestation of Africa occurred in early human history. The implication that humans are responsible also strains the credibility of the estimates.


15 posted on 09/02/2015 11:06:39 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Dropped 46%, and yet recent studies in South America have revealed that most of the “Rain Forest” there post-dates the various MesoAmerican cultures i.e. a lot of Central and South America was deforested by the MayIncAztecs and *grew back*.

So right there I have to doubt their numbers. They’re probably also counting the desertification of the Sahara which roughly correlates to the appearance of protohominids, which they have “deemed” the start of “human” civilization.


16 posted on 09/02/2015 11:06:48 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

US forest acreage hit its low in 1920 (750 million acres in 1920, out of 1045 million (not incl. Alaska & Hawaii) when Europeans arrived).

Since then we’ve been replacing forest (currently at a rate of about 3 million acres a year).

One reason is that we don’t need farmland to grow food for the horses who were the main transpostation power before cars.

In 1910, 25 to 30% of all the farmland in US was used to grow food for the horses.

Oil/gas has a FAR smaller footprint than growing food for horses — 83 million acres for horse food in 1910, compared to 16 million acres for all energy production and conversion now.

But we’d be going backwards with solar and wind, which have a big footprint.


18 posted on 09/02/2015 11:07:59 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Tree Leaves Matter !!!


19 posted on 09/02/2015 11:09:08 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

That is atrocious!!!

Think of all the CO2 they are pumping into the air. It is going to kill us all!!

It is the fault of that Save-the-Trees movement from several decades ago.

Trees converted to lumber no longer produce CO2.


22 posted on 09/02/2015 11:12:27 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I have 20 maples growing in my eavestrough do they count?


23 posted on 09/02/2015 11:13:36 AM PDT by madison10 (If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I remember a couple decades ago, there was a big complaint that “X number of acres or square kilometers/miles” of Amazonian rain forest was being cut down every day/month/year and that all of that virgin forest was being destroyed. Someone actually took the figures and calculated them and discovered that the numbers had to have been imaginary, because the ‘acres cut’ came to be about twice the land mass of north and south America, or some similar size.


31 posted on 09/02/2015 11:18:50 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Could be a Global Tree epidemic?


32 posted on 09/02/2015 11:19:03 AM PDT by Leep (Cut the crap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Ah..that a BIG CO2 sink to miss...(as plants breath in/consume CO3)

Ive question the computer climate models on how they model plants vs animal's (flora vs fauna) both are dynamic in growth vs decline... so co2 emitter (fauna) vs co2 consumer (fauna) are always changing

I have thought that it might be flora/fauna cycle driving part of the ice age / warming period cycles

...aka a warm co2 environment would favor fauna..as the plants expand.. they consume co2 emitter o2 to the point that it changes the co2 /o2 balance ...and we going it to a cooling..this lead to a die back of plants and expansion of animals.. who are o2 consumers co2 emitters.. so cycle again to warm.....

34 posted on 09/02/2015 11:19:44 AM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans Patriots are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Using a combination of satellite imagery, forest inventories, and supercomputer technologies, the international team of researchers was able to map tree populations worldwide at the square-kilometer level.

The supercomputer technologies requires some human input. So I believe there may be 15X more trees in the world than originally thought. Did they count the 11 trees I have planted in the last 5 years? I doubt they would show up on satalite.

35 posted on 09/02/2015 11:21:44 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I bought 8 tree’s in the last 4 years.....


38 posted on 09/02/2015 11:22:32 AM PDT by Osage Orange ( How do you get holy water? You boil the hell out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson