Skip to comments.
Three trillion trees: Study finds there are 7.5 times more trees than previously believed
http://phys.org ^
| September 2, 2015
| Provided by: Yale University
Posted on 09/02/2015 10:56:17 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Paladin2
My question as well. Tiny saplings? And what (species) counts as a tree?
21
posted on
09/02/2015 11:10:44 AM PDT
by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: Red Badger
That is atrocious!!!
Think of all the CO2 they are pumping into the air. It is going to kill us all!!
It is the fault of that Save-the-Trees movement from several decades ago.
Trees converted to lumber no longer produce CO2.
22
posted on
09/02/2015 11:12:27 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Red Badger
I have 20 maples growing in my eavestrough do they count?
23
posted on
09/02/2015 11:13:36 AM PDT
by
madison10
(If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter)
To: Paladin2
To: cicero2k
Water vapor accounts for something like 95% of the greenhouse effect on Earth, yet the global governance (gorebull warming) crowd rarely ever mentions it.
25
posted on
09/02/2015 11:13:52 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: MUDDOG
In 1859 however, the Comstock Lode was discovered in Virginia City, Nevada. During the 1860s Tahoe became the center of a lively commerce involving the silver mines in Virginia City and the Central Pacific Railroad (which was pushing over the Sierra toward the town of Truckee). The Comstock era resulted in large-scale deforestation of the Tahoe Basin, as timber was required to build mine shafts and support growing developments. It is estimated that over 80 percent of the Basin's forests were clear cut during this time.
It doesn't take all that long really to re forest, Tahoe today aside from the damage done by beetle is a thriving full forest.
26
posted on
09/02/2015 11:15:09 AM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: GeronL
Science: today’s best guess.
27
posted on
09/02/2015 11:15:34 AM PDT
by
The Iceman Cometh
(Proud Teabagging Barbarian Terrorist Hobbit Crazy Cracker Son-of-a-Bitch!)
To: madison10
Only if you put them in the ground on Arbor Day..................B^)
28
posted on
09/02/2015 11:16:21 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: TomGuy
Trees TAKE IN CO2 and GIVE OFF O2....................
29
posted on
09/02/2015 11:17:04 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: al baby
30
posted on
09/02/2015 11:17:28 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: Red Badger
I remember a couple decades ago, there was a big complaint that “X number of acres or square kilometers/miles” of Amazonian rain forest was being cut down every day/month/year and that all of that virgin forest was being destroyed. Someone actually took the figures and calculated them and discovered that the numbers had to have been imaginary, because the ‘acres cut’ came to be about twice the land mass of north and south America, or some similar size.
31
posted on
09/02/2015 11:18:50 AM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: Red Badger
Could be a Global Tree epidemic?
32
posted on
09/02/2015 11:19:03 AM PDT
by
Leep
(Cut the crap!)
To: Magic Fingers
After admitting their estimates were off by a freaking lot they make another
I bet you dollars to donuts there are more trees in the continental US today than when Columbus first came close to North America.
33
posted on
09/02/2015 11:19:17 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Cruz is for real, 100%)
To: Red Badger
Ah..that a BIG CO2 sink to miss...(as plants breath in/consume CO3)
Ive question the computer climate models on how they model plants vs animal's (flora vs fauna) both are dynamic in growth vs decline... so co2 emitter (fauna) vs co2 consumer (fauna) are always changing
I have thought that it might be flora/fauna cycle driving part of the ice age / warming period cycles
...aka a warm co2 environment would favor fauna..as the plants expand.. they consume co2 emitter o2 to the point that it changes the co2 /o2 balance ...and we going it to a cooling..this lead to a die back of plants and expansion of animals.. who are o2 consumers co2 emitters.. so cycle again to warm.....
34
posted on
09/02/2015 11:19:44 AM PDT
by
tophat9000
(King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans Patriots are in rebellion... teach him why)
To: Red Badger
Using a combination of satellite imagery, forest inventories, and supercomputer technologies, the international team of researchers was able to map tree populations worldwide at the square-kilometer level. The supercomputer technologies requires some human input. So I believe there may be 15X more trees in the world than originally thought. Did they count the 11 trees I have planted in the last 5 years? I doubt they would show up on satalite.
35
posted on
09/02/2015 11:21:44 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
To: GreyFriar
Sting.................I remember that ................
36
posted on
09/02/2015 11:22:00 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: Paladin2
How large does a tree have to be to count?Interesting question considering how many libs view the start of human life.
37
posted on
09/02/2015 11:22:02 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Red Badger
I bought 8 tree’s in the last 4 years.....
38
posted on
09/02/2015 11:22:32 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
( How do you get holy water? You boil the hell out of it.)
To: Red Badger
Well, that shoots all the Man-Made-Global-Warming computer models to hell. Now they have to re-run the calculations to determine the earths O2 absorbtion rate. That would further decrease man’s .00016 contribution to CO2 collecting in the atmosphere.
....don’t hold your breath.
39
posted on
09/02/2015 11:23:56 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
To: Tenacious 1
I have more trees on my property now than when I moved here 13 years ago. I cut down the old, diseased, and trash trees and replaced them with new young trees and fruit trees..................
40
posted on
09/02/2015 11:23:59 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson