Serious prison time is called for.
She thinks it is all some kind of big joke.
Posted on 08/24/2015 2:42:54 PM PDT by conservativejoy
Putting together the information now publicly available, the question has to be asked: Did an ISIS hack of Hillary Clinton’s virtually defenseless home brew server set up the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?
ISIS has proven itself adept enough at information technology that a successful hack of Hillary Clinton’s server at her Chappaqua mansion cannot be ruled out, no matter how many Secret Service members stood guard. Apparently unbeknownst to the former secretary of state who boasted of the server’s security because of the guards outside, it is so easy to hack a garden variety server set up by a mom-and-pop operation that an ISIS (and Russian intelligence and Chinese and Romanian and many other agencies) hack is well within the realm of possibility.
Now consider what the New York Post reported yesterday, six paragraphs into a story. Paul Sperry writes:
US intelligence officials so far have determined that at least four — and as many as 305 — of the more than 30,000 e-mails Clinton and her aides have printed out and turned over to investigators were classified at the time they were written.
They include a 2011 message from Clinton’s top aides that contains military intelligence from United States Africa Command gleaned from satellite images of troop movements in Libya, along with the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was later killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. Another staff e-mail sent to Clinton in 2012 contained investigative data about Benghazi terrorist suspects wanted by the FBI. (emphasis added)
If the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Stevens were known to ISIS on September 10, 2011, then setting up the attack that resulted in his and three other Americans’ deaths would have been considerably aided.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Other than his death being useful against America’s enemies, I couldn’t care less. He deserved death for his support of radical Islamists.
And where did that come from?
Hillary was the first to use the "Youtube video" excuse.
10:38-39 p.m., 9/11/12. @StateDept tweets: " #SecClinton: I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. http://state.gov #Libya" and "#SecClinton: We have confirmed one @StateDept officer was killed in #Libya. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss." Hillary Clinton issues a statement, saying, "I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack." She adds: "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind."
That was when Hillary herself took over the Cairo embassy Twitter account and personally posted. (anyone who thinks she wasn't directing the earlier Tweets is smoking something) That was at 10:38 PM Eastern Time. That would have been 4:38 AM Sept. 12th in Benghazi. About the time Woods and Doherty were making their last stand.
------------------------------------------------
Here are two important blog posts from Sept. 11th 2012 and Sept. 12th 2012. Both are left-leaning but they expose what was going on behind the scenes to promote the "Youtube video" propaganda.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya
By ROBERT MACKEY and LIAM STACK September 11, 2012, 7:25 pm
(notice the time stamps both of the original posting and the updates)
A Timeline Of The Attacks In Libya And Egypt -- And The Responses
Brian Beutler – September 12, 2012, 8:50 PM EDT
(this posting was intended to buttress the phony "Youtube video" lie but it also exposes the exact timeline of the tweets from the Cairo embassy, the State Dept. and Hillary Clinton herself making apologies for the "Youtube video.")
The seeming vulnerability of the .gov servers could have been be due to an unsecured cobbled up cross-link to Hillary's private server.
If this doesn’t send this fat bitch to the chair what will.
wow
Ha HA Ha-
foreigners “hacked “ her server?
She sold -to the highest bidder- (excuse me -DONOR)
ANYTHING they wanted- :
Emails-
military operations
state department secrets
HELL!!- she worked with her girl Friday - and the MUSLIM Brotherhood!
She is a black-hearted anti American communist
She should be tried for negligent manslaughter at the very least.
100%
Did a hacked email or huma, set up our SEALs to be shot down in Afghanistan or was that a Jarrett deal for osama?
This is like peeling an onion. No way should this Muslim have had access to all the info she did.
Yep. “Donations” to the Clinton foundation bought access to any secret she had access to.
Huma is behind it.
She thinks it is all some kind of big joke.
What I would like to see is something more like this:
We don’t have actual evidence her server was hacked (yet), although I find it likely that it was.
However, I don’t think that’s the real issue. I think she was a wholesale distributor of US national security secrets to buyers around the globe. That’s the only good explanation for the scale of the money that flowed to her - plenty of others have sold influence, but none have had their wealth increase by that magnitude for doing so.
Nice graphics, thanks Servant.
It’s enough to see that obama and hillary were directly responsible for this situation getting so effed-up to begin with, for which they both already should have been impeached. But the Congress and Senate didn’t have the guts nor integrity for it then, and neither do they now. So they too bear direct complicity.
We are all in one hell of a mess.
The compound where Stevens was did NOT have the required level of security of Installations where ambassadors are to be.
Now in the course of this entire episode the installation where Stevens was has been described as a few things,but it was not the embassy,that is in Tripoli,Benghazi was a hit bed of Terrorist activity,the British ambassador was attacked,they pulled out,The American Red Cross was attacked they pulled out,Stevens was operating here,WHY? Nobody seems to want to know what he was doing there,the building was described as a mission,there was no safe room which is policy for ambassadors .
Would be interesting what was on Hillary’s email on this,but I think a lot of people knew there were guns being run to terrorists in Syria to help dump Assad from Libya,the Russians knew it and Hillary’s info gave them what they needed to get him with little difficulty,Obama was in bed,Hillary was on the radio telling Muslims we were sorry for a video and these men were sacrificed to cover this cluster f..k!
To use Hillary’s own words “what difference does it make now?”
You see - even if undeniable evidence is shown that Hillary is 100% responsible for the death of Ambassador Stevens -it means nothing if nobody in a position to take action actually DOES SOMETHING!
President Obama has boldly, brazenly, and unapologetically directly violated the law, violated the Constitution, and expressed disdain for said rule of law and Constitution - Yet Congress has done NOTHING. NOTHING.
So again, I as - what difference does it make?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.