Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waiting for Android’s inevitable security Armageddon (Link Only due to copyright issues)
Ars Technica — LINK ONLY | August 10, 2015

Posted on 08/11/2015 9:33:12 PM PDT by Swordmaker


Supported Android 5.1 Devices that might be updated to patch security issues and All Others that will not be updated.

LINK TO THE ARTICLE: Editorial: Android's update strategy doesn't scale, and that's recipe for disaster.

Read the article at the link above. . . cannot be posted on FreeRepublic due to copyright issues.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: android; security; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Swordmaker

LOL, no problem. :-)

Maybe I should REALLY confuse everybody and start an Android ping list. We do need one, after all....

Not tonight, I’m going to sleep...


21 posted on 08/12/2015 12:05:41 AM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; JosephW; Only1choice____Freedom; amigatec; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

22 posted on 08/12/2015 3:42:40 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topspinr
Here you go, moron.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3323653/posts

23 posted on 08/12/2015 4:01:07 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I think I’m going back to BlackBerry, even though my Windows phone seems okay.


24 posted on 08/12/2015 4:35:26 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Fragmentation. It’s always been known to be the issue for Android. I think the plan is to worry about it later while it takes over the market with”free”.

The plan is probably two users to throw away the old phones and tablets.


25 posted on 08/12/2015 6:17:36 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

They learned how to dominate a market.


26 posted on 08/12/2015 6:18:11 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

The article is wrong, their percentages are way off.

They admit it later on in the article then start throwing around random estimates.

Still, the security issue is embarrassing for the Android, the nice thing is you can change your operating system entirely on an Android phone.

With an Android phone, you have control ultimately and have the power to make your phone as secure as you want. Of course, you have to have the skills and the patience to do it.


27 posted on 08/12/2015 6:25:02 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
They learned how to dominate a market...

... giving new meaning to 'buyers remorse'.

28 posted on 08/12/2015 8:05:07 AM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
You say most Android users, but you really men most users overall.

It sounds like you just don't like Open Source or Se the value in it? Because that seems to be the cause of what you don't like in Android.

29 posted on 08/12/2015 8:14:55 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
Do you not know about health-food zealots? Ask Washington state apple growers how stress-less growing apples is!
30 posted on 08/12/2015 8:41:18 AM PDT by grayeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

“Here you go, moron.”

So what, i don’t have either of those phones with the biometric sensor.

Now go crawl back in your litter box.


31 posted on 08/12/2015 9:32:25 AM PDT by topspinr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: topspinr
So what, i don’t have either of those phones with the biometric sensor.

So you don't have either of those Android phones. . . but I bet you have one of these 630,000 Android phones:

Personal details of 500 million Android users at risk: Researchers find it is impossible to completely clear data from handset when changing phone


By JAMES DUNN FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 07:07 EST, 23 May 2015 | UPDATED: 11:19 EST, 23 May 2015 — DailyMail UK


This research was confirmed and the only way to safely dispose of Android devices is to SHRED them. You cannot sell them, give them away, or donate them without providing vital personal information such as passwords or other ID data. The majority of Android devices did not wipe the internal memories at all. . . nor did the ones that did erase the internal memories erase them with industrial/military strength overwriting. They merely reset catalogue pointers so that the data was still present in the "reset" or "erased" device.

This problem will not be solved for all older Android devices either because the manufacturers and carriers have no particular interest or benefit to push out an update to fix it.

32 posted on 08/12/2015 9:54:05 AM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: topspinr

Make that “ you have one of these 630,000,000 phones”. . .


33 posted on 08/12/2015 9:59:03 AM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dila813
The article is wrong, their percentages are way off.

They are? Not according to the statistics just from OpenSignal this month. Here is the latest report on Android distribution in the wild:

And here is what Google/Android project says they will be doing to "correct" this problem:

That's just 19 devices including the Google Nexus models, but it leaves only about 24,000 other Android devices that Google is going to depend on the USERS to find and download a patch on the Google Play Store to install. . . not to mention all the Android derivative OSes that don't use the Google Play Store such as LiMo, Maemo, Moblin, Gecko, MeeGo, and Tizen, all of which also have this vulnerability and the same models of updating. Not all makers of the Android device are Google partners by a long shot. Some are fly-by-night white box makers who come and go before you even notice they were there, except their devices are still in the wild.

34 posted on 08/12/2015 10:26:18 AM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
> You say most Android users, but you really mean most users overall.

Well, right, actually I said: "...most Android users (like most users everywhere in the consumer marketplace)...".

> It sounds like you just don't like Open Source or See the value in it?

That's pretty funny, since I've been using and contributing to open source since before it was called "open source" -- the late 1970's to be specific. I was one of the "hobbyists" that little Billy Gates whined about in his famous open letter to the HomeBrew Computer Club in 1976. I've used both open source and FOSS (GNU) system and application software since it became available, and Linux and the various Unixes (NetBSD in particular) are my favorite OSes. So no, I wouldn't say I don't like it or don't see the value in it... :-)

But I also see the value in controlled environments like Apple's walled garden, where things like security updates and bug fixes can be distributed rapidly and thoroughly. The Android environment is much less controlled, and as a result it's less safe -- it's the nature of the business, that's all. Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer choice.

I've made most of my living the past 40+ years with the use of non-open source software, and recognize that making a profit on software is entirely legitimate business. But that doesn't mean I prefer it philosophically over open source. If anything, I tend to believe that software as a product in and of itself is over-valued a lot of the time.

35 posted on 08/12/2015 12:30:12 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson