Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientist warns world to 'think twice before replying to alien signals from outer space'
Press Reader ^ | Thursday 23 July 2015 | VICTORIA RICHARDS

Posted on 07/22/2015 8:36:50 PM PDT by garjog

Professor Matthew Bailes said 'the history of weak civilisations contacting more advanced civilisations is not a happy one'

"... he warned that making contact with aliens capable of transmitting powerful signals to Earth over tens of thousands of light years could lead humanity into disaster, because they're likely to be so much more advanced."

(Excerpt) Read more at pressreader.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: aliens; extraterrestrials; matthewbailes; seti
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

I’m hip...the more I learn of his universe the more I am in awe of his creation.

I offer this observation as an example:

“We hear of the conversion of water into wine at the marriage in Cana, as of a miracle. But this conversion is, through the goodness of God, made every day before our eyes. Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, and which incorporates itself with the grapes to be changed into wine; a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy!”

Ben franklin; letter to Abbe Morellet

By this same reasoning science is a tool God gave us through reason and experiment to understand his creation.....and we should fully explore all of it as possible.


101 posted on 07/22/2015 11:11:33 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Crim

At any rate they will still have to wait 20k light years to get our messages before they can employ their instantaneous star travel tech.


102 posted on 07/22/2015 11:12:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: going hot

LOL!


103 posted on 07/22/2015 11:12:27 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: garjog

Actually I pity them, whomever they are.


104 posted on 07/22/2015 11:18:21 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Yeah I get that....what I am saying is...were our science fiction goes.....science reality follows.

That is driven by inspiration, muse, and intelligence....all gifts from God.

If we found ET tomorrow...I would ask about their creation myths(if any)....where did you come from?

It would afirm my belief that there is something beyond ourselves that takes intrest in our material plane.


105 posted on 07/22/2015 11:19:20 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Crim; going hot; null and void; 5th MEB
And the 0bamasites and other assorted Parasites...

Forget network programming. All of 0bama's speeches have been beamed into space.

It's only a matter of time ... this planet will be vaporized!

106 posted on 07/22/2015 11:20:16 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Genesis is the story of Creation and God created everything in six days, resting on the seventh. Science now (and for several decades) has believed that everything, time, space, material, energy, all started with the 'big bang'. The first law of thermodynamics dictates that energy can be neither created or destroyed. It is, in other words, the Law of conservation of energy. Parallel to this is the Law of conservation of matter stating that matter can be neither created or destroyed. Since 'Trinity' on 07/16/45, those two laws are combined such that neither energy nor matter can be created nor destroyed, only transformed.

Since the 'big bang' is impossible, given these laws, there must be a first cause outside of time (since everything started with the 'big bang'). While secular scientists postulate just about anything to avoid even thinking there might be a (horrors) God in charge, Genesis explains the 'first cause' elegantly and concisely in the first four words: "IN THE BEGINNING, GOD created the heavens and the Earth..."

This man, a physicist, believes that we are currently in the seventh day, if I recall, the day you ask about. He ties young Earth age creation theory (6,000 years) to old Earth creation theory (15+/- billion years) and explains how the Earth can be both 6,000 years of age and also 15 billion years of age. (FWIW, I haven't watched this video in a number of years, so I may have made some errors in my comments about this video.)

107 posted on 07/22/2015 11:26:00 PM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Nah, ET will wonder in awe that there are creatures on this planet that believe zero’s drivel.


108 posted on 07/22/2015 11:26:27 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: going hot

You mean that’s the beeber that will stune them?


109 posted on 07/22/2015 11:29:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Earthly beebers will not stune them, all our beebers belong to them.


110 posted on 07/22/2015 11:33:22 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Again, not looking for a religious argument, but the answer to your first question is “no” I wasn’t in any way suggesting that the Bible says the earth is flat.
What I am saying is that even though the Bible and Pythagoras, may have made suggestion, even openly said that the earth was a circle, The religious scholars at the time our version of the Bible was translated didn’t recognize that knowledge, and they were still executing “heretics” who believed that the Earth revolved around the Sun, and their common belief was the earth was flat. Now, with our expanded intelligence we can study the Bible, and see it was correct, The Earth is round.

“Our planet is unique in the galaxy, designed specifically for human life.”

I have to respectfully disagree with this statement. We now know there are 100 billion stars just in our galaxy alone. We have 2 telescopes in space that in just 3 years have found thousands of planets in the “Goldilocks” zone of these stars. These planets show evidence of oxygen-Nitrogen based atmospheres. They also show evidence of moisture.
While we haven’t found evidence of life, we have definitely seen other Planets capable of supporting it.

“He created a universe for us to marvel”

I believe we were given the universe for more than this. One of God’s commands to Noah was “Go forth, be fruitful, and multiply”. Go forth was the first order of business in that statement, and God built a natural curiosity into us. He wants us to expand our mind. He wants us to see what’s out there. There may not be other life out there, but we have to go forth and find out.
To me it’s kind of like saying the Bible says God will heal us, but refusing to go to the Doctor who He gave the understanding of the body to be healed. If God expected us to only be healed by His word why give the surgeon the skills to save us. He gave the scientist the mind to understand complex math, the pilot the skill to fly, the artist, the ability to create beautiful images, or music.
God’s wishes for us are parallel to a parents wishes for a child. He wants us to love Him, and revere Him, but he also wants us to dream, and go, and reach, and discover as much as we can.
We know God loves us, He couldn’t have shown it any better than allowing us the ability to find Him any way we can.


111 posted on 07/22/2015 11:34:23 PM PDT by rikkir (Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

Not talking about God’s word.

We, humans, still believed the earth was flat, and the sun revolved around the earth.


112 posted on 07/22/2015 11:36:39 PM PDT by rikkir (Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: garjog
"Pathetic earthlings. Hurling your bodies out into the void, without the slightest inkling of who or what is out here. If you had known anything about the true nature of the universe, anything at all, you would've hidden from it in terror. "


113 posted on 07/22/2015 11:49:04 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks

Thank you. That is heartening to hear from a Pastor, especially the way I’m getting comments about not knowing the literal word of God.
I just told another poster that while the Bible mentions the Earth being a circle, the men who translated it to our language still didn’t understand that as they were still executing “heretics” for saying the Earth revolved around the Sun, and common belief until Colombus’ time was the earth was flat. We now, with our expanded knowledge (the mind being a gift from God) can study the Bible and clearly see that it says the earth is round, or like your example the bacteria in the crack of the plate.

Thank you again. I have never had a minister who I felt I could ask direct questions like this.
I hope you don’t mind if I call on you from time to time for answers/opinion.


114 posted on 07/22/2015 11:52:00 PM PDT by rikkir (Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Crim

ok, my mistake. i read your comment with “your” instead of “our”, still my points stand.

however, don’t confuse wishful thinking and science fiction with real science. there are certain truths about the universe that are inviolate. things such as the forward movement of time and the speed of limit being an upper bound. it’s fun to have thought experiments about what “could” be if such things were not universally true, but lots of experimental evidence exists to confirm that they are.

i’d love to be able to travel back in time, or to visit another galaxy. but those feats are beyond the realms of possibility according to everything we understand about the universe. sure, we can say that we should never rule out anything as being impossible as a matter of principle since we are not God and do not understand the true nature of the universe (since physics is ultimately just a way for us to model and predict future behaviors), we also shouldn’t fall into the trap of thinking that all things are possible. clearly, this is not true. experimental evidence shows that our current models for most of the big things work very well and only really require occasional minor tweaking for odd corner cases as they are discovered (such as the behavior of energy/matter at the event horizon of a black hole).

things like interdimensional portals between universes or distant points in the same universe are just mathematical conjectures. fun to think about, but purely in the realm of speculation at this point.

back to the original point about aliens. if there is anything else out there, the odds are astronomically against us ever knowing about them or vice-versa. simply because the distances involved are vast. distances of a billion light years are not really that extreme in an observable universe whose diameter approaches 90 billion light years. when you compare the volume of the universe within 1 billion light years of earth with the total volume of the observable universe, it’s a really small percentage. and that’s not even taking into account the unobservable universe with which we can never see nor interact with.

it’s these sorts of distances never taken into account in sci movies or “had waved” away with things such as wormholes and warp drives, which nevertheless make it highly unlikely that we’ll ever encounter any other life in the universe, even if it’s out there. then add to it the problem of time, and it gets even more unlikely. let’s say that there was a civilization a mere 500 light years from earth that was capable of interplanetary travel. if they existed concurrently with us, then maybe... just maybe... we’d detect their transmissions and vice versa. but let’s say they came along 500 million years before us, or 500 million years after us, or 5000 years before us, etc. we would never, ever know because even though we’re essentially next door neighbors at a mere 500 light years apart, one of us came and went before the other was around to see our EM fingerprints.


115 posted on 07/22/2015 11:53:18 PM PDT by TangibleDisgust ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Crim
I direct you to this response, in particular, the last two paragraphs.

AFA seeing life, especially 'intelligent' life? I would rather suspect that such creatures would be demons pretending to be 'aliens', to draw people from faith in the Bible.

Laugh as much as you like, but as a Christian, we know that mohamed, if he was visited by a being, as he claimed (he claimed it was the angel Gabriel), was visited by one of satan's demons pretending to be an angel. The third hadith of the first volume of Sahih Bukhari describes how this 'angel' 'pressed' mo so hard that he could not stand it and repeated this several times.

Demons are real and I believe, could and would pretend to be aliens, just to drive people from the Bible and Jesus.

116 posted on 07/22/2015 11:53:44 PM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Crim

Amen !


117 posted on 07/23/2015 12:01:18 AM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
Please see comment here. Yes, there are multitudes of angels and demons, but the comments directed to me focused on other physical life forms 'out there', as opposed to spiritual beings.
118 posted on 07/23/2015 12:02:03 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Ah.....no I get that...if there is any “life beyond life” ((meaning unexplored in the universe) is must be false life...aka a demon placed there to fool us by satan.

well that assumes two things.....

That God cannot or would not create life beyond man (which we already know he has done on our own planet with the beasts, fowl and fish of our earth)

So since he has clearly created life on this earth that is not “man”....how do you know he hasnt created other life in his universe that is not man....and we have yet to discover it as is his plan for us?


119 posted on 07/23/2015 12:04:02 AM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
You know that is a great point to bring to the religion forum,I will do so...
120 posted on 07/23/2015 12:15:55 AM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson