Posted on 05/17/2015 11:07:03 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
It is critical that Mark, Glenn, Rush and Sean announce their preferences early, to winnow the number of conservatives in the race.
As they have for the previous 8 or more election cycles, the RINOs have put their money on a single candidate, while the conservative vote is divided among more than ten viable candidates.
Cruz or Walker.
All the rest support surrendering the rule of law and the country to fraudulently documented foreigners.
I’m sure Rubio will be one of them. Mark shills for this dude..
Top two have to be Cruz and Walker. I don’t even see a third. Hell no to Paul or Rubio.
Cruz or Walker, enthusiastically. Paul or Rubio, will hold my nose and vote.
Jeb ? We stay home. .
Top 3? I can only come up with 2 - Cruz and Walker.
If Rush or Sean join him and Glenn, we will have a shot at taking down Jeb.
Some people resent this kind of action by conservative talk radio hosts, but it's important to remember that the Republican nomination process is not written in stone.
The nominee used to be selected in a smokey backroom.
While there is now a nominally democratic selection process, it is merely a fig leaf for a smokey frontroom.
Since before Reagan's nomination, and with the exception of Reagan, the Republican nominee has been selected 2-3 years before the election in a smokey backroom. This candidate has received the lion's share of corporate largesse, and the lion's share of Establishment support.
Meanwhile, conservative support has been fractured between several candidates leaving the field wide open for the liberal, RINO nominee.
Additionally, primaries are now front-loaded, giving the monied candidate an enormous advantage in a battle of expensive television ads. And Republican primaries also allow crossover voting in many states.
So the process is rigged, with only a pretense of democracy.
It's time the grassroots used our advantage to our advantage. The RINOs certainly do. This isn't a college debate. It's a street brawl. It's time we conservative treated it as such.
It sounded like he had less than three in mind. I'm guessing that it's Cruz and Walker.
I don't trust Rubio or Paul either.
Exactly right.
I hope he does not have Rubio on that list. I’d lose respect for him.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3290761/posts
Walker Cruz Rubio is my thoughts.....we’ll see.
He said top 3,but that some of us and some candidates would be disappointed. Let the herd be culled...
“Top two have to be Cruz and Walker. I don’t even see a third. Hell no to Paul or Rubio.”
Absolutely!!!
Cruz and Walker are head and shoulders above the rest.
WOW!
You're the author of the Mark Levin show?
How cool is that?
Levin is right about this.. I have watched over the last few cycles where no one in talk radio was taking any position on any of the candidates...wait and see...wait for it...and then suddenly....it was over and we got Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney....all establishment 1st picks. Then Rush would try to talk them up, but it was failing over and over. I don’t really even know how Bush won, except for the awfulness of Al Gore and that JF Kerry being such a brahmin. We really need to do better, but I am sure the fix is in and Jeb Bush will slink thru and win the nomination and lose the general by 8 million votes to Hillary Clinton.
Vote for Rubio? Then you are voting for the alien invasion and the arrogant lies that Rubio told in support of the Gang of Seven legislation.
or 4 if you can count better than I can.
Ted Cruz
Could care less about what Beck wants..... he not to be trusted
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.