Posted on 02/22/2015 11:53:50 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
It’s really quite remarkable, how much more energy-efficient everything is these days. Our houses are built to higher standards; our fridges use a fraction of the power they used to, our cars get better mileage — yet we are using more energy per capita than we ever have.
I am loath to bring up good old Stanley Jevons here. His theory, also known as the rebound effect, was that if things become more efficient, we use more of them. Even as our houses get more efficient, they get bigger and we fill them with more stuff, pretty much negating the efficiency gains. A few years back the Jevons Paradox became the darling of climate skeptics and others who wanted to kill the drive towards greater efficiency, so I am on dangerous ground here. However it just keeps coming up again and I fear they might be right. Amory Lovins argued against the point years ago using the fridge as an example:
After all, there is a maximum size to the refrigerator you can easily put in a kitchen and a limit to the number of refrigerators you need in your house. In short, improvements in efficiency have greatly outpaced our need for more and larger fridges.
And we know what happened there — fridges just got bigger and bigger.
Have a look at these pie charts from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Between 1993 and 2009, our heating and cooling used up less of our power, while our appliances, electronics and lighting went up from 24 percent to 34.6 percent of our overall consumption, and the total amount of energy used in a home went up. Flat screen TVs are more efficient than the old ones, but they got BIG. In fact, everything got big. The EIA notes the results of its recent survey:
Data show that newer homes were more likely than older homes to have dishwashers, clothes washers, clothes dryers, and two or more refrigerators. Newer homes, with their larger square footage, have more computers, TVs, and TV peripherals such as digital video recorders (DVRs) and video game systems. In total, newer homes consumed about 18% more energy on average in 2009 for appliances, electronics, and lighting than older homes.
Then, as Matt Power of Green Builder Media points out, we keep adding gadget after gadget, most of which are sucking power in standby mode. We buy wireless WiFi speakers instead of wiring them into a stereo that has a power switch. We buy cordless phones that are plugged into the wall as well as the phone outlet, TVs that most people don’t even realize have an on/off switch because they use the remote, computers that we leave on because booting up takes so long. Just at my desk right now I have nine devices running or charging, and I consider myself a minimalist about electronics.
And with the new Internet of Things and smart houses, it's just going to get worse. Every one of these little smart plugs is drawing electricity to keep that little receiver going so that it can listen for your instructions. It’s fascinating that so many of these new smart technologies are marketed as money and energy savers, yet they are all little energy sucks on their own. And it all adds up.
I see Stanley Jevons everywhere these days, even in the mens’ room, where there are now LED TVs serving ads over the urinals. There are LED-encrusted wallpapers and even snowsuits. LEDs are consuming milliamps in ways that nobody ever expected. As the data show, we manage to just keep using more energy to power more stuff in ways we just can’t even imagine.
It is a difficult subject for all of us promoting energy-efficiency; you start to ask yourself, what’s the point? All of the savings are lost to house size, air conditioning and gadgets.
It’s one of the reasons for promoting the whole minimalist, live-with-less movement; we're going to need a real cultural change if we're going to make any real difference in our consumption of energy and our resultant carbon footprint. Martin Holladay of Green Building Advisor, discussing the same issue a few years ago, suggested this:
I'm calling for the voluntary adoption of a simpler lifestyle: one with less work, fewer possessions, and more leisure time. A graceful transition to such a lifestyle would be the greatest possible gift to our children and grandchildren.
At the time I thought he was dreaming; now I think he was right.
Another lecture by a leftist telling us why we all suck. And I bet this schmuck uses more energy than I do, by the way.
Yep. I haven’t posted any preaching from ‘Mother Nature Network’ in a while. ;)
It’s just endless from those people. They don’t have lives. All they know how to do is hate.
“LEDs are consuming milliamps”
That’s some o’ that there science what the climate denier types don’t believe in.
I remember a study / forecast that an economics professor did in reference to the Carter Years before Obama was elected predicting the same thing.
He has some name that he was using that Econ Professors apply to the shopping experience when things are on sale.
If you plan on spending money on cloths, you go to the mall and you buy shirts that are normally 10 dollars for 1 dollar, you have 10 dollars to spend, so you buy 10 shirts.
You didn’t save 9*10 dollars, in your mind you might think that, in fact you didn’t save anything because all 10 dollars were spent.
It's called PROGRESS. Something MARXISTS/COMMUNISTS/LIBERALS can't embrace.
I'm willing to bet that all of these liberals have large homes with lots of energy-consuming appliances.
I have no problem with advocating using less energy ... free speech after all .... and it’s not such a bad idea to be less dependent energy wise.
However, I do have a problem with forcing less energy use ... which this article is not advocating by the way
I’m all for the minimalist lifestyle. In fact, I read this article in the print edition, sent my letter to the editor, he transcribed it for me, et voilá, here it is on your screen. I didn’t consume a single electron or photon.
They’re all control freaks.They want to mandate the size of your house,your car,what you eat,how many children you are allowed.
I lived with a save-the-planet guy that would go put in CFLs and buy an $8000 pellet stove and such... but when it came down to everyday life, he drove an SUV, would have every lightbulb and television going at once, routinely fall asleep on Friday/Saturday nights with the entire farmhouse light up like Ft. Knox, all the TVs going, with the Macintosh MC-240 tube amp cranking through a pair of Bozaks.
The best was in the summertime... he would open up the kitfhen and living room doors to the sunporch with Jalosie windows and crank the AC to cool the sun porch.
Whenever he went away for the weekend or on vacation, I was knocking $10/day off the power bill in the summertime, just by doing conservative stuff like turning off lights and ventilating the whole house at night when the air was cool and then sealing up the house in the morning... and the 21" thick stone walls kept the house cool just about all day long with no AC.
I have totally given up ironing.
I don't do laundry until it's up to the ceiling and I chock full my washing machine.
I cook by the pot and freeze...and voila...no cooking all winter long.
So what do I do with my savings?
What savings....They're always raising the rates and surcharges.
Thank you for posting the link to Marching Morons. I’ve been searching for years.
That's all I got from the article.
The article had an interesting jump from per household energy use in its 1950-2010 graph, but total usage in 1993-2009. Always be wary when the scales change or the item being measured changes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.