Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’ll Be Damned, These Boneyard B-52s Can Still Fly
War is Boring ^ | February 18, 2015 | Joseph Trevithick

Posted on 02/19/2015 8:02:37 AM PST by C19fan

The Air Force is working to get a B-52 bomber back into service after it sat collecting dust for seven years at the famous Boneyard at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona.

On Feb. 13, the B-52H—with the serial number 61–0007—left the desert for its new home with the 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. This is the first time the Air Force has “regenerated” one of these bombers from the Boneyard back to active duty.

(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...


TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; air; aviation; b52; buff; warisboring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: knarf

BFL


61 posted on 02/19/2015 11:17:17 AM PST by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

I’ve always read that due to the cost of engineering the current B-52 fleet to the way they want them it would be cheaper to build entirely new planes.


62 posted on 02/19/2015 11:21:09 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
The Shah’s helicopter was probably an AH-1 Cobra.

That's it. It was a Cobra.

63 posted on 02/19/2015 11:33:48 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: knarf

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Davis-Monthan+Air+Force+Base/@32.1656811,-110.8523853,9843m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x86d6653db2375c9b:0xdf50c8f87748ce38

A Google Satellite link. Pretty amazing. I’ve driven around it.


64 posted on 02/19/2015 11:38:40 AM PST by IamConservative (If fighting fire with fire is a good idea, why do the pros use water?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The only bad part of a re-engine is no more black smoke coming from those B-52s at takeoff. :0

If I remember correctly, only the B-52 G and H had TF-33's. I think the B, C, D and F models had Pratt J-57's. D-M had a Buff Squadron in the early sixties. As kids, we loved watching them blow out bunches of black smoke as they took off.
65 posted on 02/19/2015 11:47:51 AM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; All
Remember this amazing feat after loss of the tail?


66 posted on 02/19/2015 11:53:40 AM PST by QT3.14 (Help control the Liberal population. Have a Liberal spayed or neutered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol

Nope. The G & H model have 8 engines.


67 posted on 02/19/2015 12:00:45 PM PST by Half Vast Conspiracy (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Back in the early 70’s I was doing IRAN’s on EB-57’s at Otis AFB in Massachusetts.

Only jet I ever saw with Buick jet engines on it. Not sure of the model number, but I think it was a J-65.


68 posted on 02/19/2015 12:02:09 PM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
The reason for the re-engine proposal is not only eliminating the smoke contrails, but also more power at takeoff (220,000 lb. thrust from four F103's versus 144,000 lb. thrust from eight TF33's) and way lower fuel consumption. Just the more engine power makes it easier to carry the massive GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb that weighs 30,000 lb., some 8,000 lb. more than the famous World War II Grand Slam bomb.

If the re-engine proposal goes through, combine it with the internal upgrades, and it will be an aircraft that is even more amazing than it already is.

And the savings in fuel could easily pay for the engines - some of the original studies about new/different engines were extremely flawed.
69 posted on 02/19/2015 12:29:22 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux

G models had the J-57.


70 posted on 02/19/2015 12:54:31 PM PST by Half Vast Conspiracy (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: central_va

They will probably be on the expedite the chopping list.


71 posted on 02/19/2015 1:30:34 PM PST by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dreyfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Back when Men thought water could burn ...

Actually, the early models burned coal.


72 posted on 02/19/2015 1:31:49 PM PST by skeptoid (the thot plickens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I remember doing a job in Fort Worth - around 1987 I suppose. Was off the end of some approach. It was amazing to watch them come in to land in the dusk, one after the other with their landing lights on. I forget now - but it seemed like an endless stream of them - at least a dozen planes all lined up. And much closer together than commercial landings.


73 posted on 02/19/2015 1:35:17 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lefty-lie-spy
It was so beautiful and practical, that the Ruskies created their own version. I love this plane almost as much as the SR-71.


Then you would like the Pima Air and Space Museum in Tucson, next to the D-M boneyard.

Outside they have three B-52’s you can walk around and a SR-71 in one of the display hangars.

74 posted on 02/19/2015 4:29:45 PM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
Only jet I ever saw with Buick jet engines on it. Not sure of the model number, but I think it was a J-65.

You are correct, the J-65. Originally started life as the Armstrong-Whitworth Sapphire and was adapted by Wright as the J-65, and Buick was selected as a second source. This link has a story from 1955 about production beginning at Buick, interesting to read the paper. Another story is of the B-47D beginning flight testing, powered by a Wright T-49 (which was a turboprop version of the J-65). And A&P has picnic hams for $0.33 a pound!

75 posted on 02/20/2015 10:32:14 PM PST by fallujah-nuker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
On Feb. 13, the B-52H -- with the serial number 61–0007 -- left the desert for its new home with the 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. This is the first time the Air Force has "regenerated" one of these bombers from the Boneyard back to active duty.
Otherwise, it's a hell of a stupid idea to "boneyard" them in the first place. I hope Zero doesn't read about this in the papers or see it in the news, he'll Executive Order the whole bunch of them scrapped.
76 posted on 02/21/2015 9:23:14 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("When the last B-52 is flown off to be mothballed, the flight crew will return home on a B-52.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I wonder how if would perform with 4 GE90’s?;)


77 posted on 02/22/2015 11:02:41 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

You just gotta luv the B-52! What a work horse! I wish they would outfit them with glass cockpit and high bypass turbo fan engines and fly them another 60 years.


78 posted on 02/22/2015 6:05:57 PM PST by agincourt1415 (USAF Power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Otherwise, it's a hell of a stupid idea to “boneyard” them in the first place. I hope Zero doesn't read about this in the papers or see it in the news, he'll Executive Order the whole bunch of them scrapped.


A bunch were scrapped and laid out for Ruski satellite pics at the D-M base. Part of one of the nuclear disarmament treaties -


79 posted on 02/25/2015 2:44:59 PM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

Thanks az_gila.


80 posted on 02/26/2015 5:27:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson