Apple Just Had The Most Profitable Quarter Of Any Company Ever

TechCrunch ^ | January 27, 2015 | by Greg Kumparak

[wardaddy]

Not we

Some

I’m ambivalent about Apple

[wardaddy]

My main question is how do people date anymore

Women are addicted to social media etc

Guys to games

Man

I’m glad I missed all that

I see young couples both staring at phones instead of talking while out at dinner

Totally oblivious

I have to bitch at my rib to put her’s down when I get home

She lives in Facebook...drudge...Instagram...breibart.....FR.......INSTAGRAM.....PINTREST.....NET A PORTER......PAGE six

And so forth

i post here in the tub or in bed late or when waiting on someone in my truck

My phone is for communication for work and family

[wardaddy]

Amen

[Captain Peter Blood]

Anyway to go back further than that say 100 years ago?

[Pearls Before Swine]

Remember when Jimmy Carter railed against “obscene profits” from the oil companies? You won’t hear that about Apple (nor should you), because a) they are cool, and b)Tim Cook is in a protected class.

[Swordmaker]

Anyway to go back further than that say 100 years ago?

Not that I know of. . . but there were no no global companies of comparable size then. Perhaps the British might have had something in their Tea trading company but I doubt it.

[Swordmaker]

Look at the profit margin. For Exxon and Walmart, it’s like 8% and 2.5% respectively; for Apple (AAPL), it is like 58%.

Make up stuff much? Apple's 10-Q for the quarter being reported puts it's aggregate profit margin before taxes at 39.1% and their tax rate is 26.3% on that. Microsoft used to report an approximate 60% margin. . . but then they only sold software then.

[CincyRichieRich]

Look at the profit margin. For Exxon and Walmart, it’s like 8% and 2.5% respectively; for Apple (AAPL), it is like 58%.

Make up stuff much? Apple’s 10-Q for the quarter being reported puts it’s aggregate profit margin before taxes at 39.1% and their tax rate is 26.3% on that. Microsoft used to report an approximate 60% margin. . . but then they only sold software then.

---

My mistake, bro, but, I’d hope we’re on the same side here...my POINT is that the LIBERALS, hopefully you are NOT one always complain about company profit margins, but you won’t hear them complain about their baby, AAPL. Stop accusing, sometimes mistakes are INNOCENT.

[Swordmaker]

My mistake, bro, but, I’d hope we’re on the same side here...my POINT is that the LIBERALS, hopefully you are NOT one always complain about company profit margins, but you won’t hear them complain about their baby, AAPL. Stop accusing, sometimes mistakes are INNOCENT.

Sorry. I think we may be. I just don't want the anti-Apple people to latch onto it because of erroneous facts. My abject apologies. Mea Culpa for not realizing you were a fellow traveler.

[TXnMA]

"So why the virtual Windows?"

Well, for me, it is because when ACD Systems bought out Canvas, my "workhorse" app for cartography and all other things graphic, the PC weenies killed off Mac development at rev X.

They have made noises about re-starting Mac support -- but, I haven't seen any running evidence, yet...

Canvas is now up to rev 16 for the PC, so, when the non-intel 17" MBP I'm using to run Canvas X (on OSX 10.5) dies, I'll move to the latest Mac and run Windows & Canvas 16 virtually...