To: BenLurkin
and, at the direction of two members of store management, was handcuffed and led before other store employees Something doesn't sound right. He wasn't handcuffed at the direction of the store manager. He was handcuffed by police who had probable cause to cuff him.
51 posted on
01/23/2015 2:01:38 PM PST by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
And that alleged probable cause was what?
You claim it exists on what basis?
Because you wish it to?
62 posted on
01/23/2015 2:07:27 PM PST by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
All they need is reasonable suspicion to arrest him.
That is a lower threshold than probable cause.
63 posted on
01/23/2015 2:08:22 PM PST by
chris37
(heartless)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Why would cops listen to store management? If they had the goods on the kid, they would have handcuffed him and taken him out to the patrol car. I’m not saying the kid was innocent but this is a very weird story.
64 posted on
01/23/2015 2:08:30 PM PST by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson