Posted on 11/27/2014 4:56:05 PM PST by Swordmaker
Yesterday, my girlfriend and I borded an Amtrak passenger train in Stockton to travel to visit her friends in Visalia for Thanksgiving. Amtrak offers its passengers free WIFI as part of their amenities on the trip. As part of the log on, it specifies that Amtrak block access to "offensive" web sites, but otherwise allows free access to the Internet. I agreed to their conditions and found myself connected.
Four attempts to connect to FreeRepublic resulted in being notified that my browser could not connect to the server! Thinking FR might be down, I turned off my WIFI, and reverted to my cellular connection, and was instantly connected to FreeRepublic. Turn on WIFI, no FreeRepublic. MSNBC, there. CNN, likewise. There. But FR, is BLOCKED as an offensive website! I am offended.
bttt
Where do you ride? This is the Central California Corridor, down the Central Valley, right through FreeRepublic's home in Fresno. I wonder if might be a local WIFI supplier contract issue?
I'm starting to get better. . . But GF couldn't eat Thanksgiving dinner with friends that we'd been planning on seeing for months. RATS. She's laying in the guest room.
Have a happy Thanksgiving to you and yours, KoRn.
Have a happy thanksgiving, mate. Hope you and the GF are feeling better soon. :)
I don't dislike Amtrak, but it does need to improve. The Northeast is profitable, but Amtrak needs a few new routes.
My wife and I stayed at a brand new La Quinta in Ocean City,MD last weekend. It had only been open 10 days. The official ribbon cutting took place Friday the 21st.
Fox News Channel is listed in their cable line-up that scrolls on the info screen, but the actual channel is blank, dark, nada.
I’ll never bother with that Mexican outfit again.
Wyoming can be proud: only state not touched by this madness.
TN just barely makes it.
Like Conrail, it needs to be fully privatized. I think if Amtrak takes on the airline industry (to me, flying is a hassle) and if Amtrak got some high speed rail, it could compete with airlines.
It’s all those pics of Helen Thomas. We tried to warn everyone they were offensive.
Already happened :-)
“It was a different time, you understand.”
Typical!
FR is also blocked at the Public Library in Brookline, Mass.
If any of you guys are going between NOLA and Chicago, check out Pullman Rail Journeys. I know and have worked with a few of the principals involved in that organization.
“Yeah,how many man hours (and taxpayer dollars) are wasted by government employees downloading porn during work hours?”
Let’s do a government study on that.
LOL
Next time check to see if salon.com, slate.com, democraticunderground.com, dailykos.com and thenation.com are available.
80% of the study time would be spent looking at the porn the bureaucrats look at to better categorize the porn they look at.
That sucks becuase I like amtrak.
Ah, a ferroequinologist?
Like Conrail, it needs to be fully privatized.
That's probably true, but what Amtrak is dealing with now is the aftermath of years of overbearing govt. regulations that served to bankrupt many Eastern Class 1's and fostered the advent of Conrail. But even the government couldn't make money running trains because of their regulations. It took the Staggers Act that came some four years after Conrail was formed to enable Conrail (along with other floundering railroads) to make a profit and become a private corporation so that they could eventually have a two way stock split between NS and CSX...
Keeping in mind that back in the day when Pennsy and NYC both ran passenger service from NYC to ChiTown on a 15 hour schedule, the infrastructure was in place to do so. Both had vast miles of four track superhighway, and passenger trains for the most part never were delayed by needing to share track with freight. That track luxury is no longer available (although in most locations the right of way is still in place if more track/dedicated passenger track were to be added.)
I don't wish to incite a lot of flaming darts, but here are some, I think, valid points to add into the equation. The first consideration is that IF we are to make an attempt at having a solvent passenger rail service, then that service needs to operate on dedicated track. Keep in mind that at the present time the railroads must build and maintain their own infratructure and supporting network - track, ROW, bridges, signaling, and maintenance of it all - while the competition gets facilities (airports e.g.) and infrastructure (air traffic control system, interstate highway system e.g.) bought, maintained, and paid for with your and my tax money. Amtrak does not own any of the trackage that it runs on with the exception of the North East Corridor (where they actually do an excellent job), so they have no direct control over how impeded their travel is because at any time the freight railroad that owns the track could decide that their freight train with 105 cars full of left-handed widgets is more important than the convenience of the passengers that they delay. Where the funding for that dedicated track comes from is anybody's guess - and no I don't think CA Gov. Moonbeam's or _resident Oblomba'a idea of high speed rail is the way to go - mostly because in those instances we have bureaucrats 'designing' the system instead of rail people, and things thought up by politicians invariably are glorified ponzi schemes.
If and when passenger service has reliable access to track then they can start issuing realistically competitive schedules. Referring to a previous example, if you now check Amtrak's schedule between NYC and CHI, you find the shortest scheduled trip time is close to 20 hours for the Lake Shore Limited (remember it was done daily back then in a reliable 14-15 hours). BUT you also find THIS notice when you go to book a seat.
Then, along with their dedicated trackage, Amtrak needs a real railroad person in charge with the authority to actually act instead of being forced to implement whatever scatterbrained idea some political appointee in District of Corruption decrees. The only way to get a real railroad person in that spot is if Amtrak were privatized and hired their own CEO instead of him being a political appointee. Then the stockholders would determine his future by the success of his policies instead of the quantity of his political contributions. Seems to me that the last real railroad guy they had as Amtrak President got fired because he tried to stand up to congress/Wash and loudly state what needed to be done to make Amtrak viable.
Fully privatizing Amtrak would be a step in the right direction but only if, in conjunction with that move, the restrictive elements that at the present time are not in the control of anyone at Amtrak are fixed...
Unfortunately, even if Amtrak is 'fixed' we will never see a NYC Niagara smoking down the Water Level Route again...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.