Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 20th-Century Dictator Most Idolized by Hitler (Mustafa Kemal Atatürk)
thedailybeast ^ | 11.24.14 | William O’Connor

Posted on 11/27/2014 1:50:39 AM PST by dennisw

Stefan Ihrig's exhaustively researched new book, Atatürk in the Nazi Imagination, charts the outsized role that Atatürk and the New Turkey played in the minds of Germany’s Weimar-era far right—an influence that extended through the Nazi years. Turkish Revolution was the most hotly-debated foreign issue in the early 1920’s. Not only did the Nazis model themselves after the Turkish National Movement, but Nazi leaders from Hitler and Goebbels were personally entranced by everything Atatürk did.

In the aftermath of World War I, Germans—conservatives became consumed with the idea they had been unfairly treated at the Paris Peace Conference (‘raped’ is a word they often used), and stabbed in the back by supine bureaucrats and minorities in Berlin. Yet even as the Germans wallowed in bitter self-pity, another defeated superpower underwent dramatic turnaround.

When the last vestiges of the Ottoman Empire were dismantled by the Allies in the Treaty of Sèvres, modern-day Turkey was also chopped up, with large portions going to Greece and Armenia, as well as major powers like Britain, Italy, and France. However, beginning in 1919, Turkish nationalists—led by Atatürk in Ankara—transformed from beleaguered underdogs into a determined force that beat back the Greeks, French, and Armenians on multiple fronts. Over a tough few years, they defeated the seemingly invincible forces arrayed against them— more importantly, they were able to negotiate a new treaty, the Treaty of Lausanne, in 1923, which established modern Turkey.

“In the eyes of a desperate and desolate Germany,” writes Ihrig, “this was a nationalist dream come true, or rather something like hyper-national pornography.”

Nazi texts proclaimed that the annihilation or expulsion of the Armenians was a “compelling necessity.”

Over the next four and a half years, the conservative paper Kreuzzeitung would run a total of 2,200 articles, items, and reports on Turkey.

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; History
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/27/2014 1:50:39 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw
another defeated superpower underwent dramatic turnaround.

Umm, the Ottoman Empire hadn't been a superpower for several centuries. Wasn't called the Sick Man of Europe for nothing.

2 posted on 11/27/2014 2:19:22 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
This is Islam, an absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, a rotting corpse which poisons our lives.

- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Founder of Modern Turkey)

3 posted on 11/27/2014 2:35:20 AM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

They (the authors of this piece) ignored Hitler’s love of the grand mufti.


4 posted on 11/27/2014 2:49:41 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The nazis were NOT of the far-right. I do not care who says it, or how often they repeat it.

Socialism and totalitarianism are products of the far-LEFT.


5 posted on 11/27/2014 3:36:08 AM PST by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Unfortunately the Turks have forgotten the legacy of the Ataturk.


6 posted on 11/27/2014 3:44:12 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Precisely so. For a wonderful quote on that, see the Hayek quote on my FR profile page. It’s the third one down.


7 posted on 11/27/2014 3:45:34 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I lived in Turkey for a year - active duty. Ataturk’s claim to fame was that he forced a secular government and modernized the written language of Turkey.

For that, he was revered. What the current govt in Turkey is doing is a slap in the face of Ataturk.

Turks are fierce fighters.

Let me tell you two stories from my tour:

The locals would say that American men beat and abused their wives because they did not want their daughters becoming Americans. Because they couldn’t understand women working on the base, they claimed that our women soldiers were just there ‘to service the men’. This created a double standard where our women were openly leered at by the locals, but looking twice at one of their women was grounds for action.

One of our women was downtown and got groped by a drunk Turk in a tea bar. She came back on base, told the MPs, they got our liaison, and went down to the chief of police to make a report. He brought them all to the tea bar and asked her if she saw the guy. She pointed him out. Via the liaison translator, “Are you sure?”

“Yes.”

He says something in Turkish, six guys get up and beat the guy into a bloody pulp.

“Are you satisfied justice was done?”

“Ummm, I guess.”

“Good, no sense making an international incident of it.”

Second story: this was the late 80’s. A small group of Iranians showed up in town and began harassing the Americans who came off base to eat and shop.

As a result, the base issued an order restricting Americans to base.

Lasted three days.

The Turks beat those damned Iranians and ran them out of town on a rail. Mayor came up to base and certified there would be no more harassment from Iranian riffraff: “You’re free to come spend money with us again.”


8 posted on 11/27/2014 4:23:23 AM PST by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

The Iranian riff-raff were impeding commerce. Meaning the American servicemen spending money in town


9 posted on 11/27/2014 6:58:29 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

This quote was removed from Wikipedia as poorly sourced.


10 posted on 11/28/2014 7:21:50 AM PST by Does so (SCOTUS Newbies Imperil USA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Does so; Nateman

Perhaps so, but the history of the Ataturk is such that he might very well have said it. He was what might be called a radical secularist when it came to government and religion.


11 posted on 11/30/2014 5:24:24 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson