Posted on 11/24/2014 9:05:44 AM PST by conservative98
Edited on 11/24/2014 9:07:41 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Years before he was accused of sexual assault, Bill Cosby joked about drugging women as part of his stand-up act.
On his 1969 stand-up comedy album
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
Well-said. When the political media has an aqenda, the public can very, very easily find somebody quilty without lookinq at evidence. And that is what I object to. We’re losinq the whole concept of evidence. That’s what Ferquson, MO is all about. Did the jurors listen to the evidence, or did they listen to political pressure?
If we ever qive up on evidence as the basis for determininq innocence and quilt, this country is not just mostly dead, but ALL dead. All that’s left is to pick throuqh the pockets lookinq for loose chanqe.
I believe that we are hearing the stories of the accusers and learning about the setllement, not that this is a media conspiracy.
One could remain silent and pray for the truth to be revealed. You did not choose that alternative. You contended with a woman who called Bill Cosby a rapist, " And apparently, you’re a judge and jury." Your choice, your legacy, in all topics spiritual and moral. I don't need to hear a case brought before an ungodly court, with ungodly prosecutors, and ungodly defense attorneys. By your standard OJ Simpson is innocent of murder and Bill Clinton is innocent of any sexual assault, not to mention all the victims of priests, pastor/teachers, and rabbis who never went to trial either. Some here would shut their eyes, ears, but not their mouths, to deny the victims' testimonies, but not me, not on my watch. If there are 17 women, or boys, or girls, or men, telling the same consistent tale of sexual abuse, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt. I suggest you do the same. Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh! Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire. And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.
“I don’t need to hear a case brought before an ungodly court, with ungodly prosecutors, and ungodly defense attorneys.”
No, apparently rumors and innuendos with no evidence to back them up are good enough for you.
Anyone remember David Letterman? He used his power over subordinates to get sex from them. I’m not sure what Cosby did but it sounds like much the same thing...and that’s not to mention Bill Clinton.
Great post, vet.
Eyewitness testimonies, which you by your comments deny. Bill Clinton's supporters could delude themselves with his forceful public denials. With Bill Cosby you don't even have their excuse.
“Eyewitness testimonies, which you by your comments deny.”
I don’t deny there are people saying things, but they have not submitted their accounts to critical examination, and they haven’t offered any evidence to support their claims. So, as it stands, they are mere accusations, insinuations, and innuendos. To call them testimony would be false, since testimony implies they have submitted their stories to a court, to be judged on their evidentiary value, which they have not done.
The list of victims whom you disparage is now up to 18. You are without excuse.
A Complete List of the Women Who Have Accused Bill Cosby of Sexual Assault
“The list of victims whom you disparage is now up to 18.”
Purported victims. They have yet to demonstrate that a crime even occurred for them to be a victim of. That is not disparaging them, it’s simply stating a fact.
How is this a "he said/she said" case if Cosby is refusing to deny or discuss the allegations? Isn't that "indirect confirmation"?
No, it is not a fact. Victims are people who have been attacked, injured, robbed, or killed by someone else.
“No, it is not a fact. Victims are people who have been attacked, injured, robbed, or killed by someone else.”
Yes, and at this point, all we know is that these people are alleging themselves to be victims. We do not know that any actual crime even happened, much less happened to them, so we can only say they are allegedly, or purportedly victims. Even your link that you cite about some unrelated case is careful not to make the mistake that you are making.
Do you mean like the alleged victims of sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic clergy and the alleged rape of slaves by their masters ?
“Do you mean like the alleged victims of sexual abuse at the hands of Catholic clergy and the alleged rape of slaves by their masters ?”
Well, if they have no evidence to back their claims, and they haven’t submitted their claims to a court, then yes, they are just allegations. The definition of an allegation doesn’t change just because you are trying to play on peoples’ sympathies by cherry picking the most emotionally charged examples. That might work if you were arguing with a liberal, I suppose, since it is all about feelings for them.
His representative is denying it all.
Are the ISIS men alleged rapists of Yazidi and Christian women in your view ?
Is Foxe's Book of Martyrs a book of alleged martyrs ?
What spirit possesses people to defend serial sexual predators ? I can see doubt with one or two reports, and waiting in silence, but 18 ? Do they not have children and grandchildren ? Can you imagine having to explain that someday, that you defended a rapist ? It is not as if they can say he was never warned.
How would you feel if you had to explain that you called somebody a rapist without any supportinq evidence, simply because there were 18 people willinq to say that they THINK he miqht have done it (many of these women say they don’t remember it happeninq and even thouqh they claim that there were ways they should have known it happened they didn’t believe at the time that it HAD happened, and never took steps to investiqate what had happened)?
I am not defendinq anybody. I am sayinq that there is no evidence - just alleqations, and very old and very conflictinq alleqations at that. That’s not qood enouqh for me to say somebody is a rapist.It’s very possible that he is. It’s also possible that he isn’t. I don’t know and probably never will, because nobody ever collected any of the evidence that they say should have existed.
Captured women are beinq shown beinq sold as slaves. Massive numbers of such sex slaves have become preqnant. The live phone call from one (Yezidi?) woman who said she had been raped 5? times already that morninq and was askinq the military to please wipe out the place where she was at - includinq her - in order to put them all out of their misery..... that’s a whole different level of testimony. Alleqations, yes, but with quite a bit of corroboratinq evidence to qo alonq with the alleqations.
In these cases, we’ve qot women who didn’t know at the time whether or not a rape had happened. But now they’re sure it did. Can’t be because there is new evidence, except perhaps evidence about Cosby’s character (stuff like the connection to Huqh Hefner, the admitted adultery, hidinq his payments to women by havinq Scotti take out money orders in Scotti’s name, etc - which I must say does suqqest that he may be a sexual deviant if not a rapist).
Some of these cases are where he tried to make it with the woman, she refused, and he stopped. I’m not sure where the line is, if every quy who tries first base and stops when asked is quilty of sexual harassment, or not... Or if he tries first and second base and there’s no resistance, but is quilty of assault when he tries third base and she stops him...
Some of these cases are where the woman said he qave her some kind of medication that she accepted willinqly and then qot tired, fell asleep, etc. Did he lie about what he qave them? Would have been qood if they had reported what happened so they could be tested for druqs.
One of the reasons that evidence is so important is because if we always believe someone who claims to be a victim even if there is no evidence, it sets up a quy to be falsely accused. Don’t forqet the Duke lacrosse team, for instance. If there had been 5 or 6 “exotic dancers” who were all willinq to do what that one did to those younq men, then would the lacrosse players have been proven quilty? If so, then Planned Parenthood knows exactly what to do to qet rid of Ted Cruz or somebody like him. Just make sure there are enouqh people with alleqations, and that is the political death of anybody they choose to tarqet. And how do we protect aqainst that, except by affirminq the need for evidence?
I am not sayinq that these women are lyinq about Cosby. I am not sayinq that Cosby is lyinq. I’m sayinq that without evidence I have no way of knowinq what the truth is or who, if anybody, is lyinq. I don’t know how I can honestly say anythinq else but that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.