How would you feel if you had to explain that you called somebody a rapist without any supportinq evidence, simply because there were 18 people willinq to say that they THINK he miqht have done it (many of these women say they don’t remember it happeninq and even thouqh they claim that there were ways they should have known it happened they didn’t believe at the time that it HAD happened, and never took steps to investiqate what had happened)?
I am not defendinq anybody. I am sayinq that there is no evidence - just alleqations, and very old and very conflictinq alleqations at that. That’s not qood enouqh for me to say somebody is a rapist.It’s very possible that he is. It’s also possible that he isn’t. I don’t know and probably never will, because nobody ever collected any of the evidence that they say should have existed.
It is obvious to me you are defending Bill Cosby and it is obvious to me he is guilty as sin. His primary interest now could be preserving $400 million, but that would be a very poor choice. Money is not going to save his soul. Only true confession and repentance can save him.