Skip to comments.
US scientists may have resolved 'Darwin's dilemma'
Fox News ^
| 11/15/2014
| By Matt Cantor
Posted on 11/16/2014 8:04:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-273 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Fiddle. My question is why did some fish leave the ocean to become land mammals and some land mammals leave land to become fish mammals ..... as we were taught.
2
posted on
11/16/2014 8:06:59 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
To: SeekAndFind
This should be interesting.
This time, I’ll just grab some popcorn...
3
posted on
11/16/2014 8:07:19 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe)
To: SeekAndFind
nutrient-rich water from the deep ocean to shallow waters, helping to foster new life forms Was the evolution speeding right along in the deep ocean -- you know, where all the nutrients already were? Or was that also pretty much a steady state? If the nutrients in the ocean weren't leading to an explosion of new life forms there, then why did those nutrients, once released from the deep, lead to an explosion of new life on land?
This is all conjecture. Science has become the art of interesting guessing.
4
posted on
11/16/2014 8:09:26 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
To: SeekAndFind
Sounds like the Hand of God to me.
5
posted on
11/16/2014 8:09:51 AM PST
by
Paradox
(and now here we are....)
To: SeekAndFind
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
6
posted on
11/16/2014 8:10:56 AM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Life is good.)
To: SeekAndFind
One, by scientists at Yale and the Georgia Institute of Technology,
suggests that oxygen levels
may have been . .
The air may only have been . . . . oxygen burst may have come from . . .
Yea, that's science . . .
7
posted on
11/16/2014 8:12:01 AM PST
by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: SunkenCiv
8
posted on
11/16/2014 8:14:41 AM PST
by
Explorer89
(And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
To: SeekAndFind
I’d say the biggest hole(s) to resolve are (1) How did life first originate? (and don’t give me that primordial soup without some hard facts) (2) How does evolution work to give us eyes and hands that work just where we need them? (3) How does the genetic material from a one-celled organism enlarge itself to EVER become an elephant/human?
To: SkyDancer
They probably just felt like doing it...
To: SeekAndFind
They still can’t figure out the eyeball in the lowest of species, one on either side of the organism, and usually in front, and on top . . . What blind luck! (Pun intended)
11
posted on
11/16/2014 8:17:18 AM PST
by
laweeks
To: ClearCase_guy
I think anyone who has done some scuba diving could give you some insight.
12
posted on
11/16/2014 8:17:42 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: SeekAndFind
Evolutionists only admit dilemmas once they claim to have solved them.
13
posted on
11/16/2014 8:17:47 AM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: SeekAndFind
Resolving “Darwin’s Dilemma” is easy. Darwinism, with no material evidence, much less preponderance of evidence, is a fraud and a fake.
14
posted on
11/16/2014 8:18:20 AM PST
by
PapaNew
(The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
To: SeekAndFind
Ok class , one more time. A long, long time ago nothing exploded and created everything. We will keep “plugging holes” in this hypothesis until we make ourselves comfortable that surely we will never have to answer to any “higher power” for our misdeeds.
Better give that some critical thought people. Final exam is rapidly approaching.
To: SeekAndFind
"Then about 600 million years 6000 years ago came the "Cambrian explosion" Creation. Everything changed relatively quickly, with all kinds of plants and animals and Adam & Eve emerging.
To: SkyDancer
And why did some apes evolve into man, while other apes remained apes.
17
posted on
11/16/2014 8:19:09 AM PST
by
Cowboy Bob
(They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
To: SeekAndFind
Adding oxygen doesn't imply or demonstrate that neo-Darwinian mechanism (random mutation + natural selection) produced the new functioning body plans.
To: SeekAndFind
I thought the oxygen was due to the cyanobacteria.
19
posted on
11/16/2014 8:20:00 AM PST
by
MUDDOG
To: SeekAndFind
“May have?” Since when did “may have” become science? Why didn’t all monkeys and apes evolve? This is just another theory. They haven’t “plugged” anything.
20
posted on
11/16/2014 8:21:36 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
('Provisional ballots'. When legal votes just aren't getting the job done. - The DemocRATS.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-273 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson