Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Fiddle. My question is why did some fish leave the ocean to become land mammals and some land mammals leave land to become fish mammals ..... as we were taught.
2 posted on
11/16/2014 8:06:59 AM PST by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
To: SeekAndFind
This should be interesting.
This time, I’ll just grab some popcorn...
3 posted on
11/16/2014 8:07:19 AM PST by
freedumb2003
(Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an axe)
To: SeekAndFind
nutrient-rich water from the deep ocean to shallow waters, helping to foster new life forms Was the evolution speeding right along in the deep ocean -- you know, where all the nutrients already were? Or was that also pretty much a steady state? If the nutrients in the ocean weren't leading to an explosion of new life forms there, then why did those nutrients, once released from the deep, lead to an explosion of new life on land?
This is all conjecture. Science has become the art of interesting guessing.
4 posted on
11/16/2014 8:09:26 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
To: SeekAndFind
Sounds like the Hand of God to me.
5 posted on
11/16/2014 8:09:51 AM PST by
Paradox
(and now here we are....)
To: SeekAndFind
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
6 posted on
11/16/2014 8:10:56 AM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Life is good.)
To: SeekAndFind
One, by scientists at Yale and the Georgia Institute of Technology,
suggests that oxygen levels
may have been . .
The air may only have been . . . . oxygen burst may have come from . . .
Yea, that's science . . .
7 posted on
11/16/2014 8:12:01 AM PST by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: SunkenCiv
8 posted on
11/16/2014 8:14:41 AM PST by
Explorer89
(And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
To: SeekAndFind
I’d say the biggest hole(s) to resolve are (1) How did life first originate? (and don’t give me that primordial soup without some hard facts) (2) How does evolution work to give us eyes and hands that work just where we need them? (3) How does the genetic material from a one-celled organism enlarge itself to EVER become an elephant/human?
To: SeekAndFind
They still can’t figure out the eyeball in the lowest of species, one on either side of the organism, and usually in front, and on top . . . What blind luck! (Pun intended)
11 posted on
11/16/2014 8:17:18 AM PST by
laweeks
To: SeekAndFind
Evolutionists only admit dilemmas once they claim to have solved them.
13 posted on
11/16/2014 8:17:47 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: SeekAndFind
Resolving “Darwin’s Dilemma” is easy. Darwinism, with no material evidence, much less preponderance of evidence, is a fraud and a fake.
14 posted on
11/16/2014 8:18:20 AM PST by
PapaNew
(The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
To: SeekAndFind
Ok class , one more time. A long, long time ago nothing exploded and created everything. We will keep “plugging holes” in this hypothesis until we make ourselves comfortable that surely we will never have to answer to any “higher power” for our misdeeds.
Better give that some critical thought people. Final exam is rapidly approaching.
To: SeekAndFind
"Then about 600 million years 6000 years ago came the "Cambrian explosion" Creation. Everything changed relatively quickly, with all kinds of plants and animals and Adam & Eve emerging.
To: SeekAndFind
Adding oxygen doesn't imply or demonstrate that neo-Darwinian mechanism (random mutation + natural selection) produced the new functioning body plans.
To: SeekAndFind
I thought the oxygen was due to the cyanobacteria.
19 posted on
11/16/2014 8:20:00 AM PST by
MUDDOG
To: SeekAndFind
“May have?” Since when did “may have” become science? Why didn’t all monkeys and apes evolve? This is just another theory. They haven’t “plugged” anything.
20 posted on
11/16/2014 8:21:36 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
('Provisional ballots'. When legal votes just aren't getting the job done. - The DemocRATS.)
To: SeekAndFind
Plug this hole: There is NO fossil record proving Darwin’s theory, and Darwin said he would be disproven if the fossil record fails to support his theory.
22 posted on
11/16/2014 8:21:46 AM PST by
Salvavida
(The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
To: SeekAndFind
Isn’t there is a fixed amount of oxygen in the world...some free, some bound up in other compounds? Are these scientist saying breathable oxygen was bound up and needed to be released (as in the way trees consume carbon dioxide and release oxygen)?
To: SeekAndFind
I believe that there was another supercontinent before Pangaea that had most of its land mass in the Southern Hemisphere. That was the time when Earth was mostly encrusted in an ice cover that was over a mile deep, which explains where there was very little evolution of life. It was the combination of the formation of Pangaea and the formation of oceans changing ocean current patterns that started to warm up the planet, which resulted in an explosion of life on the planet.
29 posted on
11/16/2014 8:29:00 AM PST by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: SeekAndFind
Some US Science Fiction writers are Grubering Americans about Darwin and Gorebull warming.
31 posted on
11/16/2014 8:29:25 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(The Democrats, who run America are too old, too rich, and too very/very white elitist losers!.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson