Posted on 11/16/2014 8:04:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The air may only have been . . . . oxygen burst may have come from . . .
Yea, that’s science . . .
...
Actually, it is science. People who speak with 100% certainty are the ones that raise flags.
Plug this hole: There is NO fossil record proving Darwin’s theory, and Darwin said he would be disproven if the fossil record fails to support his theory.
Exactly. And if it’s the survival of the fittest, then how come the apes didn’t die out after man came on the scene? After all, that is what supposedly happened to all the missing links between apes and men.
Good fix.
Isn’t there is a fixed amount of oxygen in the world...some free, some bound up in other compounds? Are these scientist saying breathable oxygen was bound up and needed to be released (as in the way trees consume carbon dioxide and release oxygen)?
Yeah, I guess I will have to drive my fossil fueled car to the grocery store to buy some popcorn.
I am waiting for remarks like, “Tectonic plates aren’t in the Bible!” or the alternate theory that says the continents all moved to where they are during the 40 days of the Flood. Or, “Were you there to measure the oxygen level?”
600 million years ago, oxygen may have burst forth.
Please describe the testing which is planned in order to verify this guess.
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: / Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. …The Greek word here used for “science” is gnosis (also translated knowledge, but cognate with Latin scientia whereas Greek episteme properly translates as “art”).
— 1 Timothy 6:20-21
Everything surrounding this “theory” is filled with such indefinite phrases.
Some US Science Fiction writers are Grubering Americans about Darwin and Gorebull warming.
you got that right.
I would like to move to Gondwanaland. Sounds like a cool place.
Darwin’s REAL dilemma is that he said for his theory to be correct that hundreds of millions of transitional fossils would have to be found along each major “tree-of-life” showing the gradual “evolutionary” changes occurring.
Of course nothing like that has ever been found. And of course nothing like that has every been found or every will be because of the issue of irreducible complexity. Oh and because of the fact that life obviously “evolved” by intelligent design and not by an impossible string of random accidents driven by a ridiculously powerful negative entropy in a universe that otherwise just slowly disintegrates at almost every level like a toy top wobbles and falls after it’s set spinning on the floor
Based on geological evidence, Ian Dalziel believes what is now North America remained attached to the supercontinent Gondwanaland until the early Cambrian period, in contrast with current belief, which has the separation occurring earlier. …Interesting. There is another account, and it has mankind around when the continents separated.
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.The name Peleg comes from Hebrew palag, which means to split apart; the name itself means “earthquake”.
— Genesis 10:25
It’s a shame how negative stereotypes of Conservatives can be confirmed by the majority of the content on this thread.
Science is about testing and observation; pure speculation comes from without and is the domain of just about everything else. Saying “based on the evidence” and coming up with wild statements is not using one’s “evidence” as the basis.
The cyanobacteria give off oxygen from water as part of their photosynthesis.
(I think.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.