[Blood of Tyrants]

What she really means is that she is afraid Republicans might declare an unborn person as a person and deny her the ability to murder it at will.

[MrB]

And even more to the core (for the most part they don’t take joy in murdering babies),

she is referring to her ability to fornicate without any consequences.

[DaveyB]

So if democrats win they will continue to take away a child’s right to choose. Hmmm one choice is about the convince to fornicate at will and the other choice is about stopping a murder. Not even close to moral equivalence, a woman’s right to slut it up and kill children is way more moral than stopping murder.

[hinckley buzzard]

What she really means is that she is afraid Republicans might declare an unborn person as a person and deny her the ability to murder it at will.

I believe this is right. There are bills in a couple state legislatures defining personhood as beginning prior to birth. Conceivably the senate and house could pass such a bill as well, although it would not survive a certain veto, it would scare the bejeebers out of these abortion lovers.

[Hot Tabasco]

she is afraid Republicans might declare an unborn person as a person and deny her the ability to murder it at will.

A ridiculous argument and one that will never happen in my lifetime............