1 posted on
09/28/2014 10:43:53 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
It’s only legal when the government does it.
2 posted on
09/28/2014 10:48:12 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
To: BenLurkin; GeronL
Unattended waiting areas have security cameras that record. How is this any different? Would a label on the visor be sufficient “warning”?
3 posted on
09/28/2014 10:51:21 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
To: BenLurkin
Seems the only people who aren't allowed to record conversations are the people who actually have a legitimate reason for doing so.
Basically, the politicians want it to be illegal to record THEM while engaged in criminal activities, so they just outlaw everything as cover.
4 posted on
09/28/2014 10:52:44 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: BenLurkin
Easy enough to resolve. Simply post a sign in the car that says “The interior of this vehicle is under constant audio and video surveillance.”
5 posted on
09/28/2014 10:53:33 AM PDT by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
To: BenLurkin
How it’s being driven is one thing but recording conversations is none of the owner’s business.
6 posted on
09/28/2014 10:53:36 AM PDT by
bgill
To: BenLurkin
The NSA builds Corvettes? Who knew?
14 posted on
09/28/2014 11:23:30 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: BenLurkin
26 posted on
09/28/2014 2:21:28 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson