[a fool in paradise]

Unattended waiting areas have security cameras that record. How is this any different? Would a label on the visor be sufficient “warning”?

[discostu]

Because those are A - not secret and B - not recording audio. The two big sticking points on recording laws are generally the recorder being secret and recording conversation.

[Slambat]

“Unattended waiting areas have security cameras that record. How is this any different? Would a label on the visor be sufficient “warning”?”

Video is exempt, it’s the audio that is illegal to record
without at least one party’s consent.

[PAR35]

Unattended waiting areas have security cameras that record. How is this any different?

Assuming a legitimate question, the audio recording is the difference. No problem with leaving a nanny cam in it to shoot video in almost any jurisdiction.

Some states permit audio recording if one party consents; other states say no recording unless all consent. If no one consents, it may not be legal anywhere.

It will be fun to see them load up the prisons with owners of new Caddies who commit this felony. Suits them right for going to Government Motors.