Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush talking about Article V convention of states
Artice V Google Search ^

Posted on 08/06/2014 10:14:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

An Article V convention seems to be the only way to stop Ubama. If we don't stop him soon...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Impeachment is just not gonna happen. Whether Obama deserves it or not is irrelevant. The votes aren’t there, and are not gonna be there, no matter what happens in November.

If we are gonna propose Article V amendments then perhaps we should change an impeachment process that is irreparably broken. Our Founding Fathers could not have conceived of so many men in power putting party ahead of principle when they wrote it.

As it is the only way I see a POTUS ever being impeached is if he’s a Republican with large Democrat majorities in both houses.


41 posted on 08/06/2014 11:14:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
"If it's not reauthorized by a Congressional vote, it dies."

I agree with you in principle. But the federal government has shown that it is incapable of policing itself imo.

42 posted on 08/06/2014 11:18:12 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
This hasn't happened in the history of the Republic and isn't likely to happen now.

If we want to play the "hasn't happened in history" game, let's play this one for fun.

Here is a perfectly constitutionally legal form of coup d'etat that can be used to oust Obama without going through a nasty impeachment process.


Amendment 25 Section 4

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.


Imagine the following scenario.

1. Joe Biden organizes the principle Cabinet members to side with him and declares Obama to be unable to discharge his duties as president. He submits this signed declaration to Pat Leahy and John Boehner and assumes the Presidency.

1a. As an interesting variation, "either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide" suggests that Congress can pass a law naming another body besides the Cabinet that can side with the Vice President. What if Congress were to pass a law allowing, say, a body of NYT and WaPo editors, ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-MSNBC journalists, and college deans - a totally unelected body of people - to legally declare the president incapable of discharging his duties? What if Biden gets these "intellectual elites" to side with him to oust Obama?

2. Obama then fights back by sending a letter to Leahy and Boehner stating that he is not incapable of discharging his duties, and he declares that he has resumed the Presidency.

3. Biden then gets his supporting body to redeclare within four days that Obama is still unfit for office.

4. Once Biden redeclares that Obama is unfit, Congress must then assemble within 48 hours if in session, or within 20 days if in recess, and vote to accept Biden's declaration by 2/3rds vote, or to accept Obama's declaration that he is still fit for office.

5. Congress sides with Obama and declares Obama to no longer be President.

6. Joe Biden takes over as acting President of the United States.

-PJ

43 posted on 08/06/2014 11:19:40 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A tough test . Purposely.


44 posted on 08/06/2014 11:21:12 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Trying to imagine Slow Joe having the intelligence to figure this out and the guts to try it is an interesting exercise.

I've seen a couple of movies or TV shows using that as a plot and it makes for good entertainment.

45 posted on 08/06/2014 11:24:26 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

Here’s another privision for the next amendment to the Constitution. All appropriations bills made by the House of Representatives have to be written to comply with the Constitution’s Clause 1 of Section 7 of Article I, the “power of the purse” clause.

In other words, all programs funded by Congress must be funded in stages, Congress being able to stop a program dead in its tracks by refusing to fund the next stage of a project’s funding.


46 posted on 08/06/2014 11:25:33 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

I just tuned in to find the Article V topic has now been overtaken by a Rush soliloquy about a woman being ticketed for shaving her bikini area while driving. Apparently she was on her way to meet her boyfriend in Key West with her ex husband riding shotgun. She had him steering the car while she was busy with the shaving. He must have lost concentration on copilot duty as their car rear-ended another car.

Just thought y’all’d like to know.


48 posted on 08/06/2014 11:28:50 AM PDT by shove_it (Directive 10-289 lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Article V needs to be tried, even if it fails, before a cold/hot CWII starts if only for the reason of exhausting all alternatives so the states have the high moral ground this around....

I agree.

I posted this on July 17.


Even Adams and Franklin realized that declaring independence wasn't enough; that they needed a document that made plain for all to see the acts of tyranny.

If it does nothing more than expose for all to see the way the politicians see the rule of law and the Constitution, it will serve a purpose.

It will justify what some say is the inevitable conclusion: armed conflict, civil war, revolution.

Having followed the procedures in Article V and then having it ignored, will lay the groundwork for legitimizing any armed rebellion that follows if and when some states resort to defending their sovereignty as a last resort.


-PJ

49 posted on 08/06/2014 11:32:24 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Thanks for the link.


50 posted on 08/06/2014 11:33:12 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
I'd like an amendment that defines a natural born citizen as a person born to two citizen parents. These days, due to the ease of global travel the child doesn't have to be physically born on the soil of the United States, but the child would have to be born of two parents who are already citizens at the time of the child's birth.

-PJ

51 posted on 08/06/2014 11:35:40 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog; GraceG

<>Rush inching one step closer to telling us its time to PANIC<>

I was wondering why Rush wasn’t better prepared for the Article V segment. He was uncharacteristically hesitant and not all that knowledgeable.

I think you hit on the reason. I suspect we’ll be hearing more of it.


52 posted on 08/06/2014 11:57:05 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I agree that is should be tried. I guess it’s good that some people think it might work. That way the can give it due diligence.


53 posted on 08/06/2014 11:58:14 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Alas! That these evil days should be mine.


54 posted on 08/06/2014 12:01:20 PM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We may have to do this.


55 posted on 08/06/2014 12:09:43 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
Maybe we get to see how a two-thousand year drama ends.

Think of all of the billions who died never getting this close to the final act or acts.

Yet they fought on year by year, century by century, victory never certain, without giving up hope. And they died not knowing if the dark side would win in the end.


56 posted on 08/06/2014 12:14:44 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

If Rush was not prepared he should have brought Mark Levin on to explain. Whether you agree with the idea of an Article V Convention or not, Levin knows the subject backwards and forwards.


57 posted on 08/06/2014 12:28:06 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Servant of the Cross; trisham; InterceptPoint; GraceG; demshateGod; ...
I’m pretty sure people who are proposing this process, though noble, still don’t fully understand the pickle we’re in.

Some of that pickle can be addressed by giving amendments with teeth in them.
Here's my four:

Tax Reform Amendment Fiscal Responsibility Amendment
Section I
No tax, federal or state, shall ever be withheld from the wages of a worker of any citizen of either.

Section II
No property shall be seized for failure to pay taxes until after conviction in a jury trial; the right of the jury to nullify (and thereby forgive) this debt shall never be questioned or denied.

Section III
The second amendment is hereby recognized as restricting the power of taxation, both federal and state, therefore no tax (or fine) shall be laid upon munitions or the sale thereof.

Section IV
The seventh amendment is also hereby recognized, and nothing in this amendment shall restrict the right of a citizen to seek civil redress.

Section V
No income tax levied by the federal government, the several States, or any subdivision of either shall ever exceed 10%.

Section VI
No income tax levied by the federal government, the several States, or any subdivision of either shall ever apply varying rates to those in its jurisdiction.

Section VII
No retroactive or ex post facto tax (or fee) shall ever be valid.

Section VIII
The congress may not delegate the creation of any tax or fine in any way.

Section IX
No federal employee, representative, senator, judge, justice or agent shall ever be exempt from any tax, fine, or fee by virtue of their position.

Section X
Any federal employee, representative, senator, judge, justice or agent applying, attempting to apply, or otherwise causing the application of an ex post facto, retrospective, or retroactive law shall, upon conviction, be evicted from office and all retirement benefits forfeit.
Section I
The power of Congress to regulate the value of the dollar is hereby repealed.

Section II
The value of the Dollar shall be one fifteen-hundredth avoirdupois ounce of gold of which impurities do not exceed one part per thousand.

Section III
To guard against Congress using its authority over weights and measures to bypass Section I, the ounce in Section II is approximately 28.3495 grams (SI).

Section IV
The Secretary of the Treasury shall annually report the gold physically in its possession; this report shall be publicly available.

Section V
The power of the Congress to assume debt is hereby restricted: the congress shall assume no debt that shall cause the total obligations of the United States to exceed one hundred ten percent of the amount last reported by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Section VI
Any government agent, officer, judge, justice, employee, representative, or congressman causing gold to be confiscated from a private citizen shall be tried for theft and upon conviction shall:
    a. be removed from office (and fired, if an employee),
    b. forfeit all pension and retirement benefits,
    c. pay all legal costs, and
    d. restore to the bereaved twice the amount in controversy.

Section VII
The federal government shall assume no obligation lacking funding, neither shall it lay such obligation on any of the several States, any subdivision thereof, or any place under the jurisdiction of the United States. All unfunded liabilities heretofore assumed by the United States are void.

Section VIII
The federal government shall make all payments to its employees or the several states in physical gold. Misappropriation, malfeasance and/or misfeasance of funds shall be considered confiscation.
Commerce Clause Amendment Senate Reform Amendment
Section I
The federal government shall directly subsidize no product or industry whatsoever, saving the promotion the progress of Science and useful Arts.

Section II
The federal government shall never prescribe nor proscribe what the several states teach. Neither the federal government nor the several states shall ever deny the right of parents to teach and instruct their children as they see fit.

Section III
The congress may impose tariffs, excise taxes, and customs duties on anything imported or exported, provided that they are applied uniformly and in no manner restrict, subvert, or circumvent the second amendment.

Section IV
No law may impose prohibitions of any sort on the commerce between the several states due to the item itself.
Section I
The seventeenth amendment is hereby repealed.

Section II
The several states may provide by law the means by which their senators may be removed or replaced.

58 posted on 08/06/2014 12:31:21 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Good post. Well said.


59 posted on 08/06/2014 12:34:52 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
They will take it to a judge, the judge will call it unconstitutional,

Which would be a felony:

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
One of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution is the amendment process; if the amendment was passed then there is jack that the judge can do about it without violating this law.
60 posted on 08/06/2014 12:36:05 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson