Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/16/2014 6:40:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: BenLurkin

Because the already have???

Yeah... they have.


2 posted on 04/16/2014 6:41:28 PM PDT by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Don’t do it because they’d just run it back up again.


4 posted on 04/16/2014 6:45:56 PM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Well Ben. Because it aint theirs to sell.

Give it back to the rightful owners. The states or the local counties.


5 posted on 04/16/2014 6:47:01 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

But if you insist. Average the price per acre and times it by the amount of federal land.

But, if it were given back to the local counties, the control and taxes would go directly into the local county coffers.


6 posted on 04/16/2014 6:49:07 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The feds didn’t pay the states for it to begin with. The feds shouldd pay back rent to the states and give it back


9 posted on 04/16/2014 6:52:43 PM PDT by TStro (Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Camp Pendleton alone might pay off the national debt. Just imagine 200 square miles with 17 miles of pristine Pacific beachfront in crowded Southern California. That is some valuable real estate!


10 posted on 04/16/2014 6:53:48 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Here, if you want to know how well a county can manage its assets. BTW, there is a story behind all of this.

http://www.marinettecounty.com/departments/?department=bcda1ec1f9dd&subdepartment=b5134f1ee8b7


11 posted on 04/16/2014 6:56:04 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

A lot of that land is rich in minerals and oil.


15 posted on 04/16/2014 7:01:21 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Barry would sell them to Putin and the ChiComs.


16 posted on 04/16/2014 7:01:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

How about a simple amendment to the Constitution, requiring that the percentage of land owned by the Federal government in any state falls within 2% of a national average?

FTF.


17 posted on 04/16/2014 7:02:21 PM PDT by dagogo redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
CENTER>  photo FEDERALLANDINUS_zpseb2b4c97.png

The United States government has direct ownership of almost 650 million acres of land (2.63 million square kilometers) -- nearly 30% of its total territory. These federal lands are used as military bases or testing grounds, nature parks and reserves and Indian reservations, or are leased to the private sector for commercial exploitation (e.g. forestry, mining, agriculture). They are managed by different administrations, such as the Bureau of Land Management, the US Forest Service, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the US Department of Defense, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Bureau of Reclamation or the Tennessee Valley Authority.

The above map details the percentage of state territory owned by the federal government.

21 posted on 04/16/2014 7:07:29 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

the US has 2.27 billion acres in territory

if the fedgov owns 33% of it, that’d be about 750m acres

to pay the debt, each acre would have to sell for an average price of $23,333

so no...selling every acre of fedgov land would not cover the debt.

that should give you an idea how bad the problem is


22 posted on 04/16/2014 7:07:36 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I don't think the Federal Government owns it, I am pretty sure the states own it.

I believe that the so called Federal Land is being used as collateral on the national debt.

24 posted on 04/16/2014 7:09:16 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The Treasury can create money, so Federal debt can be paid any time we want to give the Federal Reserve banksters the boot.


25 posted on 04/16/2014 7:13:49 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I can't imagine it's worth less than the $17tril owed.

It's 1/3 of the USA and much of it prime.

26 posted on 04/16/2014 7:14:42 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’ll take a shot at the answer:

Under our current monetary system it is Impossible to Pay Off the Debt, let alone stop the debt from growing annually. All Federal reserve Notes and Credits have been LOANED into existence with Interest attached. If the National Debt were paid off tomorrow there would not be a single Dollar or Credit in Dollars in existence, all that is left is Coinage which is Issued. I doubt very seriously the masses are ready for 10 cent loaves of Bread again. And NO there is not enough Coinage to pay the INTEREST DUE, for that can only be Paid through the Blood and Sweat of Labor, by design. Welcome to serfdom.


27 posted on 04/16/2014 7:16:29 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Don’t think they could retire all debt, but put a dent in it.

Feds have done this since northwest territory was surveyed. Retired rev war debt.

Needs to be tied to balanced budget amendment


28 posted on 04/16/2014 7:19:46 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

What I would like to know is this: How much of a state can the Federal Government own before the state is no longer a state? Seems to me 84% just about covers it. Nevada isn’t a state. It’s gone back to being a territory!


29 posted on 04/16/2014 7:22:10 PM PDT by johnnygeneric (Nevada territory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Yes, sell it all. Then access will be non-existent. PERIOD. /s

Keep it the way it is and fix the dam scumbags in government and DC. Do not let private citizens, corporations, foreign entities buy and restrict access to our national parks, etc. Good grief! I can see the logging companies scraping the redwoods from the ground forever! This applies to any other natural resources as well.


30 posted on 04/16/2014 7:22:15 PM PDT by SgtHooper (I lost my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Good idea, but the sell-off should be linked to a balanced budget amendment...that constitutionally requires a balanced budget. (In fact, the USA historically made a lot of money selling off land, but this practice ended long ago, except on a comparatively tiny scale.)


31 posted on 04/16/2014 7:26:05 PM PDT by matt1234 (Hitler blamed the Jews. Obama blames the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson