Posted on 05/19/2013 6:21:13 PM PDT by staytrue
Everyone who thinks one of these scandals will remove Obama from the White House is sadly mistaken.
Let's look at Nixon to see what it takes to remove a President.
In Nixon's case, it took a well prepared and knowledgeable witness John Dean, a lot of tape recordings, a press that hated Nixon, and a political party that was the same as the president and somewhat honest and fair minded.
In Obama's case, we have nothing close to John Dean, we have no recordings, the media still likes Obama and the democrat party is ruthless and corrupt as the mafia.
In short, there will be no impeachment. Get over it.
The best we can do is to administer a beating in the 2014 election.
An arrest by the SEALs will do.
The Lord Himself is going to have the first crack at him.
Impeachment File on Benghazi Coward B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a legal citizen of the sovereign Nation of Indonesia.
He will RESIGN and become a perfect martyr before an impeachment process. He would claim his inability to govern because of republicans. He would talk about how he was experiencing a public lynching. The riots would then begin.
Of course not, they in Washington,all want the guy right where he is.Destroying this country.
The rinos will just throw the next election.Just watch.
Who are the ones being stupid here!!! He already has admitted he's not aware of anything going on in his administration. "I certainly did not know anything" he says...truer words were never spoken.
What is holding everyone back?? Because they love him? - because the press loves him? - because he's black? - because he's done so many wonderful things for our country since he was first elected? Or is it because we are gutless, fear ridden nincompoops who complain that the Congress is spineless?
Are we all so helpless that all we can do is whine & wring our hands while this is going on - or will we finally wake up & decide we no konger will sit by & let our country go down the drain.
He's only one 'so called' man & even with every single adorer of his - there are more of us than there are of them.
Always the “next election”. No thanks.
We never fight later, so now is going to have to do.
Perhaps a former Secretary of State will invite him to surreptitiously meet her/him in Ft. Marcy Park. Alone. Secretly. For a tryst.
Impeachment is a Constitutional process that must operate within a framework of respect for the law and legal institutions, and a demand for accountability and limited powers of authority. Alas, there’s the rub.
Maybe someone should talk to a person on Valerie Jarrett’s staff and offer immunity.
It is actually worse than that. Who (personally, individually) was the prime beneficiary of the break in of the Dem party HQ at the Watergate? Why, as it turns out, none other than one John Dean, who hoped to circumvent the the release, publicly, of what the woman he had chosen to marry had been previously involved in.
Nixon's real 'crime' was to give his loyalty to an individual who was totally undeserving of the same...
the infowarrior
I think that the info coming out against BO in at least one of these scandals will be too much for even the dems to ignore and they will look like idiots for still trying to to cover for him after all the evidence that points to him is eventually revealed. After all, at some point the want to save their own careers and quit worrying abou BO’s legacy. Someone in one of the many scandals will squeal on BO.
I’m sure I’m not the first to tell you this, but Nixon was never impeached. He was facing impeachment over Watergate and resigned bfore impeachment proceedings began.
Clinton is the only president in recent years to be recommended for impeachment (which the House does) but he was never formally impeached because the Dems ran the Senate and refused.
>>>Im sure Im not the first to tell you this, but Nixon was never impeached. He was facing impeachment over Watergate and resigned bfore impeachment proceedings began.<<<
True.
>>>Clinton is the only president in recent years to be recommended for impeachment (which the House does) but he was never formally impeached because the Dems ran the Senate and refused.<<<
Not true. Clinton WAS impeached by the House but NOT convicted by the spineless Senate.
The tone of this sounds extremely leftist.
Just because the rinos sold us out on impeachment-with the help of a complicit media, doesnt mean we should not have impeached the corrupt slime-ball. Had clinton not been impeached, all the scandals would have simply been forgotten. Impeachment will follow him forever.
1) You've forgotten President Gore resulting!
2) Bob Woodard may factor into the 2014 election.
Is there a Liberal Demoralization Ping List, or must we search it out for ourselves? I’ve been running a little low on it lately.
Every day, new revelations are brought to light about the impending downfall of this corrupt administration. Frankly, it’s pretty much depleted my reserves of demoralization. If I didn’t occasionally stumble upon threads like this, I’d have no demoralization left.
I’ve heard of hard core demoralization junkies going slumming to pick up a supply at DU, but you can pick up some pretty nasty things in the bargain. I only partake socially, so I’d rather do without than risk those problems.
Still, a ping list would come in handy, so demoralization could be safe, legal and rare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.