Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The reviews are popping up online this afternoon. Not pretty
1 posted on 01/25/2013 1:41:47 PM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: SMGFan

Maybe it will be one of those “so bad that it’s good” things....?


2 posted on 01/25/2013 1:45:01 PM PST by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

>>One thinks he may be searching for another word their.

I assume Mark Worgan, the writer of this piece, meant to
say “there”.


3 posted on 01/25/2013 1:46:09 PM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

4 posted on 01/25/2013 1:48:57 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Sounds like Obama needs to throw a party for the movie and its stars in the White House. Press not invited.


5 posted on 01/25/2013 1:49:02 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

The modern age of spoof is depressing. They don’t spoof anymore, they just refer, actually making a joke apparently takes too much time, but putting together scenes everyone will recognize from movie trailers is somehow supposed t obe funny. It’s all the Wayans brothers’ fault, they started it with Scary Movie. Mel Brooks needs to hold a symposium before he dies, how to spoof.


6 posted on 01/25/2013 1:50:44 PM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

this guy obviously never saw ‘plan 9 from outer space’


7 posted on 01/25/2013 1:57:00 PM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

“I’d call it, The Aristocrats.”


8 posted on 01/25/2013 1:59:44 PM PST by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

I’ve actually seen a few television ads for this film. I could tell from those that the film would be an absolute stinker.


9 posted on 01/25/2013 2:05:12 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan; kronos77; mass55th; Perdogg; DollyCali; EveningStar; Borges; Mr. K; Blondie; altura; ...

I will see “Parker” this weekend and will post a review.


10 posted on 01/25/2013 2:05:16 PM PST by Perdogg (Mark Levin - It's called the Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

There are clips and trailers online for it...watched a couple....it stinks!


12 posted on 01/25/2013 2:08:33 PM PST by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

nothing can be worse than the standard adam sandler movie.

“invent unbelievable character with impossible diction. make same humor. overcome absurd obstacle. get girl”

waterboy, little niki, billy madison, don’t mess with zohan, etc, etc.


13 posted on 01/25/2013 2:09:26 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

It sounds like they’ve done nothing more than rip off “Kentucky Fried Movie,” or John Landis’ hilarious “Amazon Women on the Moon,” but added “A list” actors.

I have to admit I might check it out once it gets released for free viewing on Amazon Prime, but it does sound like something of a stinker.

Mark


14 posted on 01/25/2013 2:10:02 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

“The amazing cast includes “ ... no actor I have any regard for.


16 posted on 01/25/2013 2:13:12 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Was it as bad as SONG OF NORWAY?


20 posted on 01/25/2013 2:17:27 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Fans of 2 1/2 men are sure to like this film.


21 posted on 01/25/2013 2:18:53 PM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

****.. Over Gross-Out Comedy***

Was it as good/bad as DEAD ALIVE (BRAINDEAD)? I liked this one!


22 posted on 01/25/2013 2:20:34 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

I always stay away from “gross out” movies, stupid is not funny to me.


25 posted on 01/25/2013 2:25:37 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

Lots of competition for “worst movie ever”


28 posted on 01/25/2013 2:26:38 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan
Best Multi-Star Mashup EVER!!


36 posted on 01/25/2013 2:57:55 PM PST by Slyfox (The key to Marxism is medicine - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SMGFan

modern Hollyweird is where:

creativity equals - using dialogue that has more foul language per minute

creativity equals - using foul language dialogue that is more foul than before

creativity equals - using more foul language for the sake of using more foul language, period

creativity equals - leave nothing of violence to the imagination - more blood, more guts, more souless truly evil charaters commiting horrendous violent acts

creativity eqauls - showing horrendous and detailed bloody violence for the sake of showing horrendous detailed bloody violence

creativity equals - leave nothing related to sexual intimacy to the imagination - more full frontal nudity equals greater creativity; more detailed up-close viewing of initimate sexual acts equals greater creativity; increasing how many characters in a script are involved in sexual intimacy, on screen, equals greater creativity - in essence, anything that constitutes more “sex” equals greater creativity

creativity equals - more “sex” for the sake of more “sex”

creativity equals - increasingly rob childhood of it’s innocence more by continually putting more sexually suggestive language into movies marketed to children and putting more sexually suggestive language into more child characters in all movies, and continually lowering the ages of child characters who demonstrate an interest in or an intimate knowledge of adult sexual intimacy

creativity equals - more “sex” for more kids

[add your own additions of the obvious ways in which Hollyweird substitutes the coarsening of society for the creativity it does not have]

Hollyweird has morphed the idea that “free speech” meant that certain things COULD BE SHOWN on occasion, to the socially demeaning idea that EVERYTHING MUST BE SHOWN all the time, everywhere and in everywhere possible; that just because free speech makes it POSSIBLE, that means it is NEVER to be left out, and NOT LEAVING IT OUT is what MUST BE DONE.

Hollyweird celebrates the likes of Quentin Tarantino, and the Hollyweird community ranks him as one of their top directors - he, a man who writes and directs movies from the mindset of a violent sexed-up raunchy 13 year old boy (a phase the adult Tarantino never mentally grew out of).


42 posted on 01/25/2013 3:09:13 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson