Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

more pictures at the link

1 posted on 01/05/2013 10:39:22 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Pics and video at:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Worldwide-Aeros-Corp/180735218613257


2 posted on 01/05/2013 10:43:42 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Is it just me, or does it seem like this thing is just a big sitting duck? Except the duck is floating slowly, not sitting. Has to be a lot easier to take out than a maneuvering jet aircraft with countermeasures. Probably some Greenie thought it was a great idea.


3 posted on 01/05/2013 10:44:04 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
Hangar One at Moffett Field would be perfect for this airship:

Except for one thing...the envirokooks destroyed it because the rainwater coming off the sides was supposedly contaminated:

Today the once-beautiful and historic structure is an ugly skeleton rusting in the rain. I'm certain all those corrosion products are harmless to the environment. Rampant government stupidity is on fine public display adjacent to CA 101 in Mountain View, CA.

4 posted on 01/05/2013 10:46:53 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

After you...........


5 posted on 01/05/2013 10:46:53 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

A perfect skydiving platform for massive formations!


6 posted on 01/05/2013 10:47:48 AM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Hindenberg


7 posted on 01/05/2013 10:48:06 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

If Moochell Odinga stood next to this thing her butt might not look so big.


8 posted on 01/05/2013 10:54:10 AM PST by Eaker (Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. — Robert A. Heinlein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

This has been in the works for decades and I suspect that it will work well. They have spent a lot of time to come up with a suitable platform and it is going to be valuable.

As far as protection, I doubt that they have let that go. It is probably very difficult to shoot down. Most likely oompartmentalized envelope etc.


9 posted on 01/05/2013 10:56:05 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Happy Days are here again and I’m gonna party like it’s 1937!


11 posted on 01/05/2013 11:01:52 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Used to be a radio operator on that base in 1977, was in those hangers alot


14 posted on 01/05/2013 11:21:48 AM PST by reefdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

What could possibly go wrong? /sarc


15 posted on 01/05/2013 11:23:10 AM PST by green pastures (Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Hope it’s got a kevlar skin if they’re planning on using it for military payloads in Afghanistan. Talk about the broad side of a barn, it would be easily hit.


19 posted on 01/05/2013 11:33:25 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Up, up and away in my beautiful my beautiful balloon.


20 posted on 01/05/2013 11:40:47 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Just don’t name it after a German Field Marshall.


22 posted on 01/05/2013 11:51:19 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
The only thing we learn from history is we learn nothing from history (Friedrich Hegel).

from an article in blimpinfo.com....

Another Air Force airship, filled with 420,000 cubic feet of helium and air and costing $8.2 million, floated away and exploded last year when a tropical storm blew in during a test flight in Puerto Rico. Army aerostats have also been lost in high winds.

24 posted on 01/05/2013 12:02:52 PM PST by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows; Daffynition

We have silverfish bigger than that in Texas...

28 posted on 01/05/2013 12:37:08 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
I live and work somewhat near the hangar where this thing is stored, so maybe I'll get an opportunity to see it and/or film one of the test flights. That would be cool!

As for those FReepers concerned about it being shot down, there's no way it'll be used in any combat situation. Think of it as the air version of a cargo truck, not a tank or other battle vehicle. It can hover with payload for a lot longer than a helicopter without burning nearly the same amount of fuel. Limited purpose, but still valuable and appropriate for a number of situations.

29 posted on 01/05/2013 12:46:38 PM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( Leftists: Stupid or Evil. Sometimes both. ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
It's an aerostat. A lighter than air vehicle.

It is NOT a blimp but a rigid airship. A series of helium filled bags enclosed inside a framework, which is then covered with an outer skin to provide an airworthy shape.

Any dirigible flying today, also rigid, has very impressive control systems based on engine nacelles that pivot to give vertical control and may be able to provide for sideways/directional control as well.

Since you can put anywhere from two to hundreds of gas bags inside the frame, gunfire and most missiles aren't likely to take one down. Of course, controls and power are vulnerable in any aircraft.

The idea of such a cargo handler is not even new and, yes, proper applications are either not military or military only under quite secure conditions...not jumping troops over hostile territory or hauling supplies to some isolated fire base.

Most apt use is a niche between sea borne and existing fixed wing airlifters; faster than the former and cheaper than the latter.

39 posted on 01/05/2013 4:22:18 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

So so many parallels between now and the years preceeding WWII......you had the Zepplins of 1930s Germany, attempts at gun grabbing, pandering to the poor with blaming of certain groups (it was Jews, now old white men), Weimar Scrip and a whole new monetary system based on unending serial taxation, total debasement and corruption of the legal system......there are others .....

They might as well paint a Swastika on it (or the equivalent - The Obama Sunrise).


41 posted on 01/06/2013 2:21:48 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson