Skip to comments.A royal snub! Kim Kardashian sends Kate Middleton freebie clothing from her Kollection
Posted on 11/17/2012 1:28:14 PM PST by ColdOne
full title......A royal snub! Kim Kardashian sends Kate Middleton freebie clothing from her Kollection ... but the Duchess sends them straight back
Kate Middleton is admired for her impeccable style, and designers all over the world line up to dress the royal brunette.
So it's no suprise that during her recent trip to London, Kim Kardashian wanted to get a piece of the action.
The reality star and her famous sisters recently launched a fashion collection at Dorothy Perkins, and reportedly send the Duchess a load of free clothing, only to get them send straight back.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
About five sizes too big!
The Royals aren’t up for the latest in slutwear eh?
Reality TV and it’s minions are one of the few things I find more distasteful than the Royals...
Let Kardashian go back to doing her national striptease act so Americans can oogle her more.
Does the word licentiousness mean anything any more?
Royals sluts or LA sluts are not worth this thread.
Send the clothing to Pippa. Then send me the pics.
So the absolutely biggest and grossest butt in the universe is sending clothes to the owner of one of the finest glutei in creation?
The Kardashians are yesterday’s news.
America now craves more of the Lebanese twins from the Petraeus saga, LOL.
Compared to MooseChelle Obama, Kimmy is pretty svelte.
What an a$$.
She has the good sense not to be associated with the Kardashinans.
You go Kate!
Shamefully admitted, I took 4 years of Latin. Fr. Reich must be rolling over in his grave.
Armenian Trash... Thats what the Kardashians are and always will be.
Perhaps Kate could have donated those “fashions” to the trollops working the soccer games. They must be part of her “Lamp Post” line.
The Kardashian sisters have pretty faces and good hair, and so does the Duchess of Cambridge. Other than that, not much in common.
I love the dress with the black lace overlay that Kate wore recently. Absolutely stuning.
Kate is just beautiful isn’t she? In this article I really like the blue dress with he Betty Davis era hat.
The Duchess of Cambridge is a lovely young woman who doesn’t need freebies from a whore and porn star like Kardashian. The Kardashians are media whores who will stop at nothing to promote whatever money grubbing scam they are involved in. How I wish Americans were smart enough to ignore them, but generations of idiots raised in government schools are bedazzled by three whore sisters and their pimp mother.
Yes, that’s charming. In the spirit of the vintage style, though, she should have worn nylons! (Person quirk - I wear them even in my ankle-length dresses ;-).
She has a lot of natural appeal as well as good fashion sense/advice. The family is calling our Kathleen “Kate,” but I haven’t quite surrendered. She’s named after Maureen O’Hara (in “Rio Grande”) and my aunt, and neither one used “Kate.”
I was surfing channels one night and hit one of the shopping networks. The Kardashians were on, selling something, and Kim (I guess that’s the one with the big behind) looked absolutely freakish. Apparently she had fat injected into her hips. She’s so wide, she MUST have to wear custom-made clothing.
Hope she didn’t touch those clothes,, there might still be some of Ray J’s urine on them. Kim K, the human toilet let him pee on her for fun.
I agree; that one is gorgeous.
I could wear that. One doesn’t have to be terribly thin for it to hang right.
I remember nylons from my grandmothers time. she had those garter belt deals...........then panyhose came out...remember those Leggs eggy things?
Used to have to wear nylons with a dress, always.
True. Who wants to be terribly thin, anyway? ;)
It’s a judgment call these days - style, weather, age - but oozing infected mosquito bites definitely call for stockings.
What is KK wearing in that first picture??? is that a trash bag she has on??? How appropriate.
I’ve been through phases of terribly thin, but not lately. I was telling my 14-year-old daughter about “one apple and two tortillas per day,” and she was aghast. (She’s not overweight for 5’7”, but could use more exercise if she wants to dominate in next summer’s swim team.)
However, I think Kate needs a few cheezburgers if she’s going to do her dynastic duty before she gets too old.
yikes not a good visual TC~! oozing anything:)!
No, it’s not a good visual, but it’s common among young women here in the buggy Southeast - short dress, high heels, bare legs with oozing bites and/or bruises.
Preach it! I’m afraid Kate is way too thin to conceive.
In my 20s, I was very skinny, but I found out that women actually look better with a feminine shape. Imagine that...
It’s a tough call for the royal brides in any country (except an African or Arabian one, I guess). On the one hand, they’re supposed to look glamorous, which means thin. And then they (and the husband) often want to enjoy married life, travel, recreation, without having children immediately.
But on the other hand, suddenly they find they’re 35 and haven’t had a child, and that’s a problem in their positions. Poor Princess Masako in Japan hasn’t been able to have a son, only one daughter, iirc, and it’s been awful for her.
What is awful? Is she continuously trying to conceive/
These men need to marry some Built for Birth women.
those are some ugly clothes
What’s awful for Princess Masako is that she married Crown Prince Naruhito when she was 30, with a career in the Japanese version of the State Department, but it was expected she would have a son. After 8 years, a daughter was born, but there has been no other child. She’s in her late 40s now, older than me, and experiences “nervous exhaustion” from the stress of her position, according to general news reports.
The heir, other things being equal, will be Hisahito, the son of Naruhito’s younger brother.
Japan is more tradition-bound than most European countries, but even in England, it’s expected that wives will continue the direct Mountbatten-Windsor line by having children.
How old is Kate, do you know? I’m thinking 29, but I could be wrong.
You know, this is a slight topic change, but I was looking forward to a President and Mrs. Romney making a state visit to England. It would have been nice for the Brits to see that we still have normal-looking people in this country, and not just the Freakazoids from Planet X.
Kate was 30 in January of 2012 (the 9th, unlike my James and Kathleen, whose concurrent birthday is January 19).
All questions of political ideology aside, I too was looking forward to the dignified Romneys representing us on the world stage. Sigh. Another four years of Michelle and “What I picked off the racks during the Blindfold Shopping Spree at the Goodwill Store.”
LOL....I have to laugh or I’ll cry.
Crying will make your nose run and give you a sinus headache.
Kim K., a 5’2” fat assed hippo sends a tall, svelt, lady her clothing? Why, did Kate need potato sacks for something?
They’re both shameful & a disgrace to real women,
I sure hope Moochelle doesn’t try to send her any clothes!
They should be thrilled to have a daughter! Girls are people too.
The “nervous exhaustion” is likely due to perimenopause. It’s stressful on the body and there are a plethora of symptoms.
I am an American. I do not believe in a Royal or a fake Royal.
I know I’m behind the times on all the pop culture— whatever that is-— but I’m happy that I know absolutely nothing about the Kardashians. Nothing! I hear the name and find that long name rolls off the tongue easily, but other than that, they are blank to me.
But I guess they are to the royal couple too. HeeHee!
‘Does the word licentiousness mean anything any more? ‘
It means that you used 10 more letters that what was required: slut
Not in traditional Japanese culture.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.