Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A royal snub! Kim Kardashian sends Kate Middleton freebie clothing from her Kollection
dailymail.co.uk ^ | 11/17/12 | dailymail

Posted on 11/17/2012 1:28:14 PM PST by ColdOne

full title......A royal snub! Kim Kardashian sends Kate Middleton freebie clothing from her Kollection ... but the Duchess sends them straight back

Kate Middleton is admired for her impeccable style, and designers all over the world line up to dress the royal brunette.

So it's no suprise that during her recent trip to London, Kim Kardashian wanted to get a piece of the action.

The reality star and her famous sisters recently launched a fashion collection at Dorothy Perkins, and reportedly send the Duchess a load of free clothing, only to get them send straight back.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: fashion; nothanks; royals; snub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
Bwahaha!
1 posted on 11/17/2012 1:28:18 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

About five sizes too big!


2 posted on 11/17/2012 1:35:28 PM PST by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Royals aren’t up for the latest in slutwear eh?

Reality TV and it’s minions are one of the few things I find more distasteful than the Royals...


3 posted on 11/17/2012 1:37:03 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Somehow I think the Dutchess has the good sense not to associate herself with Kardashian. Why in the world would she want to intentionally enmesh herself, and be used by, Kardashian.

Let Kardashian go back to doing her national striptease act so Americans can oogle her more.

Does the word licentiousness mean anything any more?

4 posted on 11/17/2012 1:37:03 PM PST by Obadiah (Americans said, "Give us Barabbas!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Royals sluts or LA sluts are not worth this thread.


5 posted on 11/17/2012 1:39:22 PM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Send the clothing to Pippa. Then send me the pics.


6 posted on 11/17/2012 1:43:07 PM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

So the absolutely biggest and grossest butt in the universe is sending clothes to the owner of one of the finest glutei in creation?


7 posted on 11/17/2012 1:46:26 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

The Kardashians are yesterday’s news.

America now craves more of the Lebanese twins from the Petraeus saga, LOL.


8 posted on 11/17/2012 1:47:53 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's bankruptcy: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
biggest and grossest butt in the universe

Compared to MooseChelle Obama, Kimmy is pretty svelte.

9 posted on 11/17/2012 1:49:57 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's bankruptcy: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
You didn't take Latin or Greek! (Sung to the tune of na-na-nana-NA-NA-AA!)

LOL. You have princess Kate either owning more than one glut, or owning or controlling more than one person who has a glut each.
10 posted on 11/17/2012 1:53:14 PM PST by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

What an a$$.


11 posted on 11/17/2012 2:03:29 PM PST by freedom1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
I Royal smackdown from the Duchess herself.

She has the good sense not to be associated with the Kardashinans.

You go Kate!

12 posted on 11/17/2012 2:10:47 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: righttackle44

Shamefully admitted, I took 4 years of Latin. Fr. Reich must be rolling over in his grave.


13 posted on 11/17/2012 2:26:46 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
This woman is going to be Queen Consort some day not too far off. Last thing she needs is a bunch of tchochkes from a skeevey skank.
14 posted on 11/17/2012 2:29:23 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Armenian Trash... Thats what the Kardashians are and always will be.


15 posted on 11/17/2012 2:35:18 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Perhaps Kate could have donated those “fashions” to the trollops working the soccer games. They must be part of her “Lamp Post” line.


16 posted on 11/17/2012 2:35:51 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Kardashian sisters have pretty faces and good hair, and so does the Duchess of Cambridge. Other than that, not much in common.

I love the dress with the black lace overlay that Kate wore recently. Absolutely stuning.


17 posted on 11/17/2012 2:43:40 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Kate is just beautiful isn’t she? In this article I really like the blue dress with he Betty Davis era hat.


18 posted on 11/17/2012 2:51:39 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Duchess of Cambridge is a lovely young woman who doesn’t need freebies from a whore and porn star like Kardashian. The Kardashians are media whores who will stop at nothing to promote whatever money grubbing scam they are involved in. How I wish Americans were smart enough to ignore them, but generations of idiots raised in government schools are bedazzled by three whore sisters and their pimp mother.


19 posted on 11/17/2012 2:53:01 PM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Yes, that’s charming. In the spirit of the vintage style, though, she should have worn nylons! (Person quirk - I wear them even in my ankle-length dresses ;-).

She has a lot of natural appeal as well as good fashion sense/advice. The family is calling our Kathleen “Kate,” but I haven’t quite surrendered. She’s named after Maureen O’Hara (in “Rio Grande”) and my aunt, and neither one used “Kate.”


20 posted on 11/17/2012 2:59:30 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

;)


21 posted on 11/17/2012 3:03:50 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

I was surfing channels one night and hit one of the shopping networks. The Kardashians were on, selling something, and Kim (I guess that’s the one with the big behind) looked absolutely freakish. Apparently she had fat injected into her hips. She’s so wide, she MUST have to wear custom-made clothing.


22 posted on 11/17/2012 3:04:47 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Hope she didn’t touch those clothes,, there might still be some of Ray J’s urine on them. Kim K, the human toilet let him pee on her for fun.


23 posted on 11/17/2012 3:06:33 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"I love the dress with the black lace overlay that Kate wore recently. Absolutely stuning."

I agree; that one is gorgeous.

24 posted on 11/17/2012 3:06:41 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I could wear that. One doesn’t have to be terribly thin for it to hang right.


25 posted on 11/17/2012 3:08:52 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I remember nylons from my grandmothers time. she had those garter belt deals...........then panyhose came out...remember those Leggs eggy things?

Used to have to wear nylons with a dress, always.


26 posted on 11/17/2012 3:09:31 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

True. Who wants to be terribly thin, anyway? ;)


27 posted on 11/17/2012 3:10:20 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

It’s a judgment call these days - style, weather, age - but oozing infected mosquito bites definitely call for stockings.


28 posted on 11/17/2012 3:12:01 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

What is KK wearing in that first picture??? is that a trash bag she has on??? How appropriate.


29 posted on 11/17/2012 3:13:05 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I’ve been through phases of terribly thin, but not lately. I was telling my 14-year-old daughter about “one apple and two tortillas per day,” and she was aghast. (She’s not overweight for 5’7”, but could use more exercise if she wants to dominate in next summer’s swim team.)

However, I think Kate needs a few cheezburgers if she’s going to do her dynastic duty before she gets too old.


30 posted on 11/17/2012 3:15:07 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

yikes not a good visual TC~! oozing anything:)!


31 posted on 11/17/2012 3:18:33 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

No, it’s not a good visual, but it’s common among young women here in the buggy Southeast - short dress, high heels, bare legs with oozing bites and/or bruises.


32 posted on 11/17/2012 3:32:24 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Preach it! I’m afraid Kate is way too thin to conceive.

In my 20s, I was very skinny, but I found out that women actually look better with a feminine shape. Imagine that...


33 posted on 11/17/2012 3:33:38 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

;)


34 posted on 11/17/2012 3:37:43 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

It’s a tough call for the royal brides in any country (except an African or Arabian one, I guess). On the one hand, they’re supposed to look glamorous, which means thin. And then they (and the husband) often want to enjoy married life, travel, recreation, without having children immediately.

But on the other hand, suddenly they find they’re 35 and haven’t had a child, and that’s a problem in their positions. Poor Princess Masako in Japan hasn’t been able to have a son, only one daughter, iirc, and it’s been awful for her.


35 posted on 11/17/2012 3:45:10 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

What is awful? Is she continuously trying to conceive/

These men need to marry some Built for Birth women.


36 posted on 11/17/2012 3:57:10 PM PST by Chickensoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

those are some ugly clothes


37 posted on 11/17/2012 4:01:12 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

What’s awful for Princess Masako is that she married Crown Prince Naruhito when she was 30, with a career in the Japanese version of the State Department, but it was expected she would have a son. After 8 years, a daughter was born, but there has been no other child. She’s in her late 40s now, older than me, and experiences “nervous exhaustion” from the stress of her position, according to general news reports.

The heir, other things being equal, will be Hisahito, the son of Naruhito’s younger brother.

Japan is more tradition-bound than most European countries, but even in England, it’s expected that wives will continue the direct Mountbatten-Windsor line by having children.


38 posted on 11/17/2012 4:08:27 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

How old is Kate, do you know? I’m thinking 29, but I could be wrong.

You know, this is a slight topic change, but I was looking forward to a President and Mrs. Romney making a state visit to England. It would have been nice for the Brits to see that we still have normal-looking people in this country, and not just the Freakazoids from Planet X.

Oh, well.


39 posted on 11/17/2012 4:14:22 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Kate was 30 in January of 2012 (the 9th, unlike my James and Kathleen, whose concurrent birthday is January 19).

All questions of political ideology aside, I too was looking forward to the dignified Romneys representing us on the world stage. Sigh. Another four years of Michelle and “What I picked off the racks during the Blindfold Shopping Spree at the Goodwill Store.”


40 posted on 11/17/2012 4:19:12 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

LOL....I have to laugh or I’ll cry.


41 posted on 11/17/2012 4:22:21 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (The idiocracy has come home to roost. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Crying will make your nose run and give you a sinus headache.


42 posted on 11/17/2012 4:23:43 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Kim K., a 5’2” fat assed hippo sends a tall, svelt, lady her clothing? Why, did Kate need potato sacks for something?


43 posted on 11/17/2012 4:26:50 PM PST by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Spot on!

They’re both shameful & a disgrace to real women,


44 posted on 11/17/2012 5:17:52 PM PST by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I sure hope Moochelle doesn’t try to send her any clothes!


45 posted on 11/17/2012 5:18:15 PM PST by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

They should be thrilled to have a daughter! Girls are people too.

The “nervous exhaustion” is likely due to perimenopause. It’s stressful on the body and there are a plethora of symptoms.


46 posted on 11/17/2012 5:19:20 PM PST by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bayouranger

I am an American. I do not believe in a Royal or a fake Royal.


47 posted on 11/17/2012 5:21:05 PM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I know I’m behind the times on all the pop culture— whatever that is-— but I’m happy that I know absolutely nothing about the Kardashians. Nothing! I hear the name and find that long name rolls off the tongue easily, but other than that, they are blank to me.

But I guess they are to the royal couple too. HeeHee!


48 posted on 11/17/2012 5:22:02 PM PST by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

‘Does the word licentiousness mean anything any more? ‘

It means that you used 10 more letters that what was required: slut


49 posted on 11/17/2012 5:24:40 PM PST by Delta Dawn (The whole truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abigail Adams
Girls are people too.

Not in traditional Japanese culture.

50 posted on 11/17/2012 5:43:56 PM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson