Skip to comments.
1st Pennsylvania Regiment filled with good shots
Reading Eagle (PA) ^
| 12-30-11
| Bruce Posten
Posted on 12/30/2011 8:21:05 PM PST by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Some of you folk might not know about the importance of the Pennsylvania rifle (when made in Kentucky, the Kentucky rifle) in the RevWar, first made by German immigrants to PA. And, of course, the importance of those colonial sharpshooters.
1
posted on
12/30/2011 8:21:12 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
To: indcons; Chani; thefactor; blam; aculeus; ELS; Doctor Raoul; mainepatsfan; timpad; ...
PA Long Rifle, circa 1780
The Charleville Musket, supplied by the French to us after 1777
The RevWar/Colonial History/General Washington ping list...
And Huzzahs! to all for the New Year!
Your Obdt and Humble Svt.,
P_____y
2
posted on
12/30/2011 8:29:10 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: Pharmboy
Was this the first widely distributed rifle in the world?
To: Pharmboy
My fifth great grandfathers were German Pennsylvania Farmers who signed the Bradford Accord: Michael Sanior and Daniel Mathius. One served at Fort Pitt the other at Valley Forge.
I have a picture of their grandson (and his family) and a rolling pin the grandson made and gave to my grandmother on her tenth birthday.
Do you have any more information on the gtoups participation in the war?
4
posted on
12/30/2011 8:30:29 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(We need more Jobs.....Steve Jobs....entrepreneurs and creators.)
To: Pharmboy
I wonder how long the barrels were on those things. They sure as hell look alot longer than the one on my AR15. lol
I bet those rifles kicked like a mule.
5
posted on
12/30/2011 8:32:44 PM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: hoosiermama; All
6
posted on
12/30/2011 8:43:30 PM PST
by
marktwain
To: Pharmboy
Very interesting. Thanx for posting.
7
posted on
12/30/2011 8:46:24 PM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: ModelBreaker
Each long rifle had to be hand-crafted and were fairly expensive at the time. Although rifles were were first produced in Europe in the 1500s, they were mainly used for hunting and did not see wartime use until the mid 18th Century. The American frontiersmen--first in PA, western MD and then "over the mountains" e.g., KY--used them for hunting. They were made in America mainly by German immigrants or the sons of same.
The Brits thought the Americans were unsporting when they picked off officers from 250 yds away; but, they definitely helped us win the war.
Many say that without Daniel Morgan (born in NJ, but had a fight with his dad as a teenager and walked to Virginia) and his riflemen, the Battle of Saratoga would have likely gone to the Brits.
8
posted on
12/30/2011 8:48:04 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: hoosiermama
The German patriot regiments came mainly from PA, NY and MD, although other states had some too. The DAR and other groups would be able to give you much information on this, as well as the local historical societies in PA. The records kept during the RevWar were surprisingly complete and carefully kept.
9
posted on
12/30/2011 8:55:04 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: KoRn
Yes...very long-barreled. That’s one reason that they were not good field pieces. Some were .60 cal, but the American frontiersmen often used smaller calibers so they would need less lead. And I imagine they kicked like a mule (esp. the .50 and .60 cals).
10
posted on
12/30/2011 8:58:17 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: KoRn; All
A well-outfitted PA or VA rifleman. More often, the hunting shirts that
they typically wore would not have been as fancy as this guy's.
11
posted on
12/30/2011 9:05:33 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: Pharmboy
This is not an absurd speculation, how would the Welsh longbow of The Hundred Years War fare against the massed infantry with muskets of the Revolution, and for that matter, against massed infantry with muskets of the American War between The States?
I understand Wellington sought archers but the art had by that time virtually died out.
12
posted on
12/30/2011 9:16:51 PM PST
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: Pharmboy
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach |
|
|
Thanks Pharmboy. [singing] Kentucky shooters strike with their own kind of rif'...
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. |
|
13
posted on
12/30/2011 9:26:04 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
To: nathanbedford
Not absurd at all...the Welsh bowmen could reload--as you know--much quicker than an infantry musketman. Also, the musket's effective range was about 50 yards, while the arrow had a much longer range. The 18th century soldier had, of course, no armor (although the arrows could pierce plate armor) and no shield so the massed array of bowmen would have been devastating. And what about the cross bow for close-in fighting?
Alas, as you say, there was no one skilled in either long bow-making or arrow-shooting.
Thought-provoking point issue...thanks!
14
posted on
12/30/2011 9:32:10 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
To: Pharmboy
These weapons also made settlement of Kentucky and the Ohio River Valley possible. The Americans on the frontier needed an edge against the Indians.
To: nathanbedford
The longbow would have had a longer range and a greater rate of fire, but it took years of practice to master. A musketeer was was more easily trained so that it was easier to gather a larger force that could overwhelm the archers, whose battle losrs would also not be as easily replaced. That is why even the much cruder matchlocks quickly displaced longbows on the battlefield.
16
posted on
12/30/2011 9:33:32 PM PST
by
Salohcin
To: marktwain
17
posted on
12/30/2011 11:20:20 PM PST
by
PGR88
(Sic transit gloria mundi)
To: KoRn
Black powder burns slower than modern powders. Rifles like this don’t “kick” as much as they push. A longer push because the slower moving bullet takes longer to move down the barrel. The longer barrel was for two purposes; more bullet time in the barrel so the black powder will completely burn and more time in the rifling of the barrel to impart a spin on the bullet.
My sons have shot a lot of modern handguns and rifles. They both received a .44 black powder pistol for this Christmas. They both remarked about the “push” and not a “kick”.
Sorry, I am not in a financial situation to adopt anyone.
To: Pharmboy
Come to an Appleseed and carry on the tradition. See my tagline.
19
posted on
12/31/2011 1:10:21 AM PST
by
ebshumidors
( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
To: Pharmboy
I shoot these rifles every week and hunt with them. They do not kick bad, more like a hard push.Black powder burns slower than smokeless so the recoil is not as sharp.
20
posted on
12/31/2011 3:31:47 AM PST
by
TLEIBY308
(Keep yer powder dry and watch yer top Knot.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson