Skip to comments.
The Impossible Dinosaurs - Megafauna and Attenuated Gravity
Kronia.com ^
| Ted Holden
Posted on 03/21/2008 2:01:20 AM PDT by Swordmaker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301-306 next last
To: Shryke
Oh, you are too, and you know it.
61
posted on
03/21/2008 1:00:13 PM PDT
by
Dementon
(You're unique! Just like everyone else!)
To: Dementon
I AINT NO HONKEY MONKEY.
There. I said it.
62
posted on
03/21/2008 1:02:12 PM PDT
by
Shryke
To: bvw
Yes, I agree with your theory that these massive animals were supported by anti-gravitation devices developed by advanced extraterrestrials.
What?
To: jeddavis
And yet it’s still easier for me to believe that than the laws of physics being different.
To: ThePythonicCow; samtheman
Diameter does not affect gravity--only the mass of the body. A smaller earth with the same mass as today's earth would have the same gravity.
The centripetal force of a faster rotating planet would be different, though, and thus affect any weight we would feel.
65
posted on
03/21/2008 1:56:05 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: samtheman
You mean that’s NOT your theory? Oh... you are right then, it is far far better to mock what you can ignore rather than try to explain it. So much easier!
66
posted on
03/21/2008 2:09:28 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: Truthsearcher
The laws of physics are models of reality. Reality can vary.
Just like the depictions of beautiful savory meals on the tops of frozen dinners. Just a model. Reality can vary.
67
posted on
03/21/2008 2:12:29 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: ShadowAce
Diameter does not affect gravity
Diameter does affect the gravitational force you feel at "sea level", because if the earth's diameter is smaller, then someone standing at "sea level" is closer to the center of the earth.
68
posted on
03/21/2008 2:35:26 PM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
To: Alter Kaker
The existence of the Blue Whale proves that this piece is nonsense in the very first sentence:
And the existence of that reply proves that you're just looking to find fault, not insight. Rather obviously, that first sentence should have been qualified to refer to land animals, which I'm sure you're smart enough to realize.
Sometimes, it pays to be a slightly more sympathetic reader.
69
posted on
03/21/2008 2:42:31 PM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
To: jeddavis
>>Muscle tissue is nearly identically the same for all vertebrate animals; theres no way to think dinosaur muscle was better than ours.<<
“Better” may be a hard term to pin down.
I have no training here but as I understand it human muscles can be broadly categorized into types I, IIa and IIb - slow twitch and two types of fast twitch. If humans can have three types of muscles I don’t see dinosaurs could not have types of muscles that were better in some ways.
70
posted on
03/21/2008 2:47:50 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: Alter Kaker
Re: bluewhale
We’re not talking about sea creatures who’s weight is supported by bouyancy. We’re talking about land animals.
71
posted on
03/21/2008 2:48:03 PM PDT
by
Swordmaker
(There ain't no such thing as a free app...)
To: SunkenCiv; Swordmaker
72
posted on
03/21/2008 2:56:36 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(a fair dinkum aussie)
To: jeddavis
The real question: If those kinds of sizes were such a winning ticket for creatures which supposedly dominated the planet for tens of millions of years.... then why in the 70,000,000 years which supposedly has passed since they went away, has nothing else ever re-evolved to such sizes? Evolving to different sizes should be fairly easy. Competition for resources. Scarce resources means you adapt to the supply by being smaller and consuming less, or you die.
To: ThePythonicCow
Diameter does affect the gravitational force you feel at "sea level"... OK, I know that. I was thinking (at the time of my post) of "total" gravity of an object.
74
posted on
03/21/2008 3:15:54 PM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Swordmaker; SunkenCiv
P.S. A computer program devised to re-articulate the skeleton to prove they could feed themselves?
75
posted on
03/21/2008 3:21:49 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(a fair dinkum aussie)
To: jeddavis
Evolving to different sizes should be fairly easy. Adaptation - limited only by existing conditions?
76
posted on
03/21/2008 3:34:37 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(a fair dinkum aussie)
To: ShadowAce
Since the acceleration gravity is inversely proportion to the radius squared, the diamet actually makes quite a lot of distance.
77
posted on
03/21/2008 3:52:32 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: ShadowAce
I didn’t see this reply before I post #77... sorry about that.
78
posted on
03/21/2008 3:54:18 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
To: samtheman
I dunno.
With every passing year, it gets harder for me to get myself upright.
[either there’s more gravity now than when I was younger or it’s just me]....:-D
79
posted on
03/21/2008 4:52:32 PM PDT
by
Salamander
(And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent......)
To: Swordmaker
Accretion. The Earth and all bodies with sufficent mass gain more, and as they gain, their mass increases, causing more accretion. The figure I’ve seen most is 0.1%/year(dust, meteors, and water), but even at a magnitude less(.01%), it adds up.
80
posted on
03/21/2008 5:48:31 PM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301-306 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson